Our use cases for SonicWall NSa are the Global VPN and the SSL VPN, because nowadays, everyone prefers to work from home, and prefers to connect from mobile applications to our organization.
SonicWall NSa OverviewUNIXBusinessApplicationPrice:
SonicWall NSa Buyer's Guide
Download the SonicWall NSa Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: May 2023
What is SonicWall NSa?
SonicWall NSa dispenses advanced threat protection using a high-performance security platform. The NSa series implements intuitive deep learning technologies in the SonicWall Capture Cloud Platform to dispatch the automated real-time threat detection and deterrence enterprise organizations need today. SonicWall Network Security appliance (NSa) series is best for mid-sized organizations to distributed enterprises and data centers.
SonicWall NSa series next-generation firewalls (NFGWS) combine two very robust security ideologies to deliver advanced threat protection to keep users’ networks safe. Boosting SonicWall’s multi-engine advanced threat protection (ATP) is their Real-time Deep Memory Inspection (RTDMI™). The RTDMI intuitively identifies and stops aggressive zero-day threats and vicious malware by investigating memory directly. This real-time process allows SonicWall RTDMI to be accurate, lessen false positives and discover and alleviate malicious threats and attacks. SonicWall’s single-pass Reassembly-Free Deep Packet Inspection (RFDPI) will audit every byte of each and every packet by investigating both outbound and inbound traffic on the firewall. By combining the SonicWall Capture Cloud Platform along with on-box offerings such as intrusion prevention, web/URL filtering, and anti-malware, the NSa series is able to block the most malicious and dangerous threats at the gateway.
Additionally, SonicWall firewalls supply absolute protection by executing complete inspection and decryption of SSH and TLS/SSL encryption connections - no matter the port or protocol. The firewall takes a deep dive into each and every packet (the header and data) routing out any anomalies, zero-day intrusions, threats, and protocol non-compliance. Users can also define unique criteria specific to their organization to ensure their networks remain safe. This aggressive deep packet inspection is able to identify and block malicious attacks, stop dangerous malware downloads, prevent the spread of infections, and defeat command and control (C&C) communications and data exfiltration. Protocols involving inclusion and exclusion allow users complete control to decide, based on specific governance policies, organizational policies, or government or legal compliance, which traffic is to be investigated for decryption or inspection.
SonicWall Nsa offers enterprise organizations the network control and fluid flexibility they desire using an intrusion prevention system (IPS), VPN, real-time visualization, and other advanced powerful security features, making it a popular firewall solution in today's marketplace.
Reviews from Real Users
“The features that I have found most valuable are the firewalling, which is very good, and the GUI which is very intuitive. It is easy to use and provides great security.” - Network Engineer at a maritime company
“What's valuable in SonicWall NSa is the ATP (advanced threat protection). It can protect users from malicious links. SonicWall NSa also has a Sandboxing service that is very helpful for us, especially when end users accidentally click on malicious links. Another valuable feature of this solution is that it is very useful for site-to-site VPN connectivity issues. SonicWall NSa has very good hardware. I also love that SonicWall has very good technical support, who are very knowledgeable, provide good suggestions, and they're easy to reach.” - Mohammed M., Network Administrator at Transgulf Readymix
SonicWall NSa was previously known as NSA 250M, NSA 2600, NSA 3600, NSA 4600, NSA 5600, Dell SonicWALL NSA.
SonicWall NSa Customers
Orange County Rescue Mission, First Source, Michaels & Taylor, Green Clinic Health System, Aspire Chiltern Skills and Enterprise Centre, UnitedStack, Faith Lutheran College Redlands, Celtic Manor Resort, Star Kay White, Air Works, Unimat Life, NHS Yorkshire and Humber Commissioning Support (YHCS), Hutt City Council, Mato Grosso do Sul, Nspyre
SonicWall NSa Video
SonicWall NSa Pricing Advice
What users are saying about SonicWall NSa pricing:
SonicWall NSa Reviews
Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
- Date
- Highest Rating
- Lowest Rating
- Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Network Administrator at Transgulf Readymix
Easy to scale advanced threat protection solution with knowledgeable technical support, but has occasional bugs
Pros and Cons
- "Easy to scale solution that provides advanced threat protection. Their technical support is very good, very knowledgeable, and easy to reach."
- "SonicWall NSa has occasional bugs, particularly during upgrades, and that's an area for improvement."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
What's valuable in SonicWall NSa is the ATP (advanced threat protection). It can protect users from malicious links, e.g. those sent to the end user email and is clicked by the end user, who'll be led to a bad website. SonicWall NSa has a Sandboxing service that is very helpful for us, especially when end users accidentally click on malicious links.
Another valuable feature of this solution is that it is very useful for site-to-site VPN connectivity issues.
SonicWall NSa also has very good hardware, e.g. from 2013 to 2021, only one product had a hardware failure, and within 24 hours, they were able to replace that product.
I also love that SonicWall has very good technical support, who are very knowledgeable, provides good suggestions, and they're easy to reach.
What needs improvement?
An area for improvement in SonicWall NSa is that sometimes, we experience bugs when upgrading, so we have to contact their technical support to fix issues.
It would be much easier if this improvement was in place: if the one-time password which is built-in, was provided as an OTP for the administrator logging into the console, so that we'll have a quicker awareness of it, rather than needing to check emails for it. Having a Telegram or WhatsApp bot integrated with the device, for example, will be very helpful for us, so we can instantly take action, without us needing to log into and check our emails, meaning we'll be able to put things right faster.
This may not be possible in SonicWall NSa, but I'm also looking for any kind of controller or device for the Windows server or client, e.g. Windows 11 and Windows 10 from SonicWall NSa itself, so that a security domain or the gateway of the organization would be able to identify the latest update for a product, whether that product is installed or not. This feature would be very helpful, and it's what I'd like to see in the next release.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using SonicWall NSa since 2013.
Buyer's Guide
SonicWall NSa
May 2023

Learn what your peers think about SonicWall NSa. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2023.
706,951 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
SonicWall NSa performs well, but sometimes, there are bugs, so I have to call their support when this happens, and I elaborate on the problem we're facing. Support then takes the diagnostic data, fixes it, then sends back to me the firmware or the setting so I can restore my SonicWall NSa.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
SonicWall NSa is easy to scale.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team for this solution is very knowledgeable. They are able to fix issues. They understand what we are facing and they suggest very good options. They provide us very good support, and on a scale of one to five, I'm giving them a four to a five for technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used different solutions, e.g. Sophos and Fortinet, but what I noticed is that I either couldn't find how to contact their technical support, or if I was able to call their technical support, I either get a busy tone, or it takes a long time to speak to someone. As for SonicWall support, I only had to wait 10 minutes to speak to someone, and if they accidentally drop my call, they'll immediately call me, no matter which part of the world I'm in, so I switched to SonicWall NSa.
What about the implementation team?
I deployed SonicWall NSa myself. Deployment was very easy.
Last January 14th, one of my firewalls went down, so we had to replace it, but it was unfortunate that we didn't enable the local backup. At the time, what we had was the factory set up option for the device, so it took me six hours to fix, e.g. applying for the policy site to the site VPN, creating the users, etc. All those processes took a minimum of five to six hours.
I didn't use a vendor or a third party for the deployment of this solution. I only had to call their support if there was something I couldn't understand, e.g. why the traffic wasn't working, etc. For some of the processes, I took notes from their support, while for the rest of the processes, we can do it by ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
SonicWall NSa has two types of license, so the cost would depend on the license.
The advanced license is a bit expensive when compared to the comprehensive license, but when you compare the advanced license to the licensing cost of other brands or competitors, it is expensive.
One good point about the more expensive license for this product it that they provide a hardware guarantee, which means direct replacement, no matter how long you've been using it, whether you've used it for two, three, five, or seven years. You can easily have your device directly replaced if it's having issues with the firewall, software, or hardware, etc. You can get this done as an end user, or as a customer. You just have to fill in and send back the application form for device replacement, provide the serial number and the model number, and that's it. They will replace your device. It's also easy for them to transfer your license to another device. SonicWall NSa is worth the money.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated Sophos and Fortinet solutions.
What other advice do I have?
The firewall products I'm using are SonicWall NSa 3600 and 2400.
We are using the latest version of this solution.
We are using a local backup, and we also enabled for my SonicWall NSa a cloud backup for all devices. We are using six firewalls, so we enabled the flow backup, with the goal of being able to restore immediately, in case of emergency.
This product doesn't require much maintenance. Our company operates 24/7, and we deal with ready-mix concrete. It depends on the production, but SonicWall NSa continuously runs 24/7. Maintenance is done monthly, particularly for upgrading the firmware, or for restarting SonicWall server patches. Maintenance of this product only takes one hour on a monthly basis.
We have 200 end users of SonicWall NSa.
I always recommend this product to my friends and colleagues. My supplier also recommends it. I suggest to them to go for SonicWall NSa, depending on the user, e.g. if you have 100 end users. We pay for the license, for example, 2,200 dirhams, so I can get the license, and also get the SonicWall SOHO device, which is the smaller one.
My rating for SonicWall NSa is seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Manager of IT at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Stable, easy to use, and offers good content filtering
Pros and Cons
- "They offer good antivirus solutions."
- "The ongoing service fees are high."
What is our primary use case?
The solution is used basically a parameter firewall and to secure the company network.
What is most valuable?
The content filtering is very good.
The solution is easy to use.
They offer good antivirus solutions. It's basically a complete package.
The solution is stable.
What needs improvement?
There's always room for improvement.
For example, the monitoring system is in need of improvement. Their monitoring system is too expensive. Most of the company doesn't apply the monitoring system as it's too expensive. Some more monitoring features should be built into the firewall device itself.
Management spends a lot of money on the device, and they want to know what is working, et cetera. To understand this, we need some reports, graphs, and figures. Without these items, management may not be convinced they are spending the money in the right way. Having reports that reflect the work done to keep the network secure would show the benefits and the ROI in a positive way that would help sell management on the product itself.
The ongoing service fees are high.
The solution could use more online educational tools to help users understand the underlying functionality of the product. Things like videos and tutorials could help a lot.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been working with the solution for the last nine years or so at this point. It's been almost a decade.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable. We can do 80% to 90% of tasks with no issues whatsoever. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution can scale, however, in Pakistan, it's not easy not to spend so much. One device can last over five to six years. You can say scale, however, you need to have an understanding of what functionality you will need over the years. Over four to six years, the device can fulfill your requirements. After six to seven years, you can replace it with another model or another brand to meet your updated needs.
How are customer service and support?
I didn't use support over the last nine years, except for handling the device replacement itself. I needed a device replacement due to some damage, and they fulfilled my request and requirements. In terms of tasks such as configuration issues, I've never actually asked for assistance for those queries and therefore could not rate how helpful or responsive they are when they cover those matters.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
In the past, I have also used Fortinet and FortiGate as well as Juniper. I have 19 years of experience with various solutions. I have used multiple devices including Cisco, Juniper, FortiGate, SonicWall, and others. Basically, FortiGate and SonicWall are more or less the same types of solution. However, the SonicWall is easier to install than FortiGate.
What about the implementation team?
I have deployed the solution myself. I did not need the help of an integrator or consultant.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is reasonable, however, all firewalls have high prices for subscriptions for their services to cover after warranty needs for content filtering, for antiviruses, for web filtering, et cetera. All firewalls have extra prices.
After spending so much money year over year, we were surprised that we had to still pay more than the device cost just to covers services. That's why you may find that most companies stop their services and just running the firewall as a box. Most small companies stop their services just due to the high subscription fees. That said, multinationals or larger organizations likely still pay the service fees.
In places like Pakistan, a developing country, it's hard to continuously pay, as we find the continuing service fees expensive. They should work to make an exception for certain regions such as ours.
What other advice do I have?
I'm a customer and an end-user.
I can't remember the exact versions we are using. We may be on version 6, and the models I have used include the 2600, 2500, and 3600 series.
I'd warn new users that the box is huge. The box has multiple functionalities and most users are not trained. They can't benefit from all the functionality as they don't know that it exists. Due to the lack of knowledge, most users don't leverage additional functionalities which they should. While the solution offers good devices and reasonable pricing for the box, companies need to educate themselves on how they can best use the product to their advantage. SonicWall can help by posting more videos and sharing more information.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
SonicWall NSa
May 2023

Learn what your peers think about SonicWall NSa. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2023.
706,951 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Information Technology Manager at Renaissance Services
It has no issues stability-wise and is scalable, but it has a complicated GUI, its setup is complex, and its product support is mediocre
Pros and Cons
- "I like that SonicWall NSa is a stable product. It's also a scalable product."
- "One area for improvement in SonicWall NSa is the GUI. It isn't easy to understand. The support for SonicWall NSa is mediocre, which is another area for improvement."
What is our primary use case?
My company uses SonicWall NSa as the primary firewall and the SonicWall TZ series as a backup firewall. I have no idea why the company needs to support two firewalls. Still, sometimes, SonicWall NSa has an issue, so the company removes the memory card from it, then replaces it with the memory card from the backup firewall.
What is most valuable?
I like that SonicWall NSa is a stable product. It's also a scalable product.
What needs improvement?
One area for improvement in SonicWall NSa is the GUI. It isn't easy to understand.
The support for SonicWall NSa is mediocre, which is another area for improvement.
The product speed also has room for improvement.
SonicWall NSa also uses old technology compared to other firewalls, so it needs to upgrade some of its functionalities, such as the VPN.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using SonicWall NSa since 2018.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
SonicWall NSa is stable, and it has no issues, stability-wise, so it's an eight on a scale of one to ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability for SonicWall NSa is fine, so it's a seven out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support for SonicWall NSa is a two on a scale of one to ten. It isn't good because SonicWall support will only call you if they have time.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Negative
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I'm looking for a different solution so my company can switch to it from SonicWall NSa. I worked with CyberDome and then Fortinet.
Compared to SonicWall NSa, I noticed that the interface is easier than the SonicWall NSa interface. However, I'm describing non-enterprise solutions.
Support is also excellent versus the support SonicWall NSa provides. If you email or call the support team of Fortinet or CyberDome, you'll get a call. In contrast, the SonicWall NSa technical support team rarely calls, even when I could not configure the product, and my team could only see the logs. However, SonicWall NSa has strong endpoint visibility, which lets my company identify where the issue lies on the network or the infected system.
Fortinet offers a free VPN feature, while SonicWall NSa charges you for that.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup for SonicWall NSa was complex. The product took a lot of work to configure. That was critical because you had to configure rules, ports, and other parts. I'm describing new setups because, in terms of SonicWall NSa deployment for my company, I wasn't there during the deployment as I recently joined the company.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't deal with pricing for SonicWall NSa, so I have no information on that.
What other advice do I have?
Right now, my company uses SonicWall NSa.
I work for a large enterprise using the SonicWall TZ series and SonicWall NSa.
My company uses version 600 of SonicWall NSa.
The SonicWall TZ series is horrible because whenever you remove the hardware, for example, the power supply, it will take five to ten minutes before it powers on. The last time, it didn't respond, so I had to remove the firewall and reboot SonicWall TZ, which took half an hour. The firewall was entirely down, and that time was critical, so SonicWall has to fix the reboot time issue on SonicWall TZ. That was a very, very bad experience.
The company has eleven locations with a total of one thousand SonicWall NSa users.
One non-technical staff maintains SonicWall NSa. The product doesn't require much maintenance.
My rating for SonicWall NSa is four out of ten.
I'd advise others not to go with SonicWall NSa because the interface has many issues. Another issue I have with the product is the reboot time. In particular, the hard reboot is very slow in SonicWall NSa.
My company is a SonicWall customer.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Feb 2, 2023
Flag as inappropriateOwner at IT Solution
It provides better security and reduction rate but lacks proxy and quota management features
Pros and Cons
- "What I like best about SonicWall NSa is the security it offers compared to other solutions in the market. Its reduction rate is also better than others."
- "SonicWall NSa doesn't have a proxy. It also needs a quota management feature in specific scenarios where you must limit user bandwidth for a particular day."
What is our primary use case?
I use SonicWall NSa for bandwidth monitoring and aggregation. I also use it to control browsing.
What is most valuable?
What I like best about SonicWall NSa is the security it offers compared to other solutions in the market. Its reduction rate is also better than others.
What needs improvement?
SonicWall NSa has multiple areas for improvement.
One is that it doesn't have a proxy. It also doesn't have the quota management feature required in specific scenarios where you need to limit user bandwidth for a particular day, so one user isn't using up too much bandwidth compared to other users.
Active/Active HA is also missing in the product.
What I want to be added to SonicWall NSa in the future is the bandwidth optimization feature.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using SonicWall NSa for fifteen years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
SonicWall NSa is a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
To scale SonicWall NSa, you need to keep changing the model of the box, but this is the case in any other solution, so you go for hardware appliances, such as Fortinet, Sophos, Palo Alto Networks, and Check Point because after reaching a specific capacity, you need to change the model.
How are customer service and support?
SonicWall NSa has good technical support, so support-wise, I'm giving it a ten out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
My company chose SonicWall NSa over other products because it was good. It was better than others.
How was the initial setup?
SonicWall NSa is easy to implement. It took two hours to deploy the product completely.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented SonicWall NSa as we're SonicWall resellers.
What was our ROI?
There's ROI from SonicWall NSa, and its reduction rate is the best.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There are different pricing models for SonicWall NSa.
What other advice do I have?
My company uses a next-generation firewall from SonicWall, SonicWall NSa.
I'm using version 2650 of SonicWall NSa.
My company is a SonicWall NSa reseller.
In the company, everyone uses SonicWall NSa, particularly fifty people.
My advice to people looking into implementing SonicWall NSa is that it depends on the setup. What my company does is first understand the setup and why the customer wants to deploy the product. Based on the customer's answers, my company presents solutions that would work. For example, if you require a proxy or a quota management feature, SonicWall NSa will not be a complete solution. If you need Active/Active HA, SonicWall NSa won't be the right match. You need to understand what you require from the product. If you need browsing and management turnovers, then SonicWall NSa will be good enough. Overall, the product still has some areas for improvement.
My rating for SonicWall NSa is seven out of ten. For me to give it a higher rating, it should have more features. Right now, I'm unable to market it well because it doesn't score very well in Gartner. I can only position SonicWall NSa as having the best reduction rate. The product is relatively good and stable but still needs certain features.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Last updated: Jan 15, 2023
Flag as inappropriateInternet Manager at MICROBLAU SL
Great performance and security with reasonable pricing
Pros and Cons
- "The prices are similar to other vendors and the support is good."
- "I'd like to see integration with Microsoft 365 for authentication."
What is our primary use case?
The solution is a security system we install in our customer's office. It's a firewall. We have a control panel to manage and view some data and this control panel is in the cloud. However, the firewalls themselves are in the customer's office.
What is most valuable?
The security is great.
It has great performance.
The prices are similar to other vendors and the support is good.
The deployment process is simple.
What needs improvement?
I can't speak to any missing features. They've recently released a new version and it's quite good. Right now, it's the best solution.
I'd like to see integration with Microsoft 365 for authentication.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using the solution for a while. We've definitely used it over the past year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability and performance are great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. It's true that SonicWall had a lot of problems in the past, however, now it's very stable. It works perfectly.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's very scalable. In some cases, it's necessary to change the firewall, however, it's easy to change as SonicWall has the ability to migrate the configuration from all firewalls to the new one.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is great. They are helpful and responsive. We are quite happy with their capabilities.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I'm also familiar with Fortinet. I find SonicWall more secure. It also offers better performance.
Previously, we installed a firewall directly with Linux and we configured it all at once. It was very manual.
How was the initial setup?
Now, the implementation is easy. In the past it was difficult. Companies needed a specialist to deploy new firewalls. Now, they have a system that a normal technician can install.
It takes a few hours to install and deploy the product.
We have two people that handle deployment and maintenance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is on par with others on the market. It's not overly expensive.
The cheaper option is between €100 and €200. However, NSa has different models and the more expensive one is for around €10,000, more or less.
When we purchase our NSa, we buy the firewall and the security services. The security services are for a period of time from one year to three years. When we arrive at the end of the contract we need to renew the security services, however, the firewall will still work. We only need to renew the security services.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
When we decide to change from Linux firewalls to an appliance we looked at different companies, like Cisco and Fortinet, and we compared these different companies and products. We decided on SonicWall due to the relationship between performance and security.
What other advice do I have?
We are partners.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Network Engineer at a maritime company with 201-500 employees
Good firewalling and intuitive GUI
Pros and Cons
- "The features that I have found most valuable are the firewalling, which is very good and the GUI which is very intuitive. It is easy to use, and provides great security."
- "It is not scalable. If your enterprise is growing hard then you have to buy another, bigger product. Maybe if you use it virtually it is more scalable."
What is our primary use case?
We have two SonicWalls in the High Availability setup with failover configuration.
We use it for the firewalling, for IPS protection and for VPN clients.
How has it helped my organization?
With SonicWall we have more insight in the applications that users are using and what they are doing on the internet, so we can monitor better. It gives us better monitoring.
We now have more insight and information; what protocols and what websites users are trying to reach and what is blocked and what is not blocked, so we can better follow the tracks of the users.
What is most valuable?
The features that I have found most valuable are the firewalling, which is very good and the GUI which is very intuitive. It is easy to use and provides great security.
What needs improvement?
Overall, I'm quite happy about the product. The configuration and the interface are very good. Maybe the pricing and licensing could be improved.
It is not scalable. If your enterprise is growing hard then you have to buy another, bigger product. Maybe if you use it virtually it is more scalable.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using SonicWall NSa for maybe eight to 10 years.
I work for several companies, and we use the NSa with one of them.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is an issue. If you need to scale for more performance you will need another product in a higher range. You cannot scale the product itself. That's not possible.
It is not scalable at all.
We have about 350 users. I do the maintenance on my own.
We use it daily.
We do not have plans to increase at the moment.
How are customer service and support?
Their technical support is very good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not complex, it is very easy.
In terms of my implementation strategy - at first I write down the case we need. I investigate all the uses we have to implement with the SonicWall, and then I install and configurate it. I think the primary configuration was maybe three or four hours.
What about the implementation team?
It was all done by myself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
You can buy the license for one or three years, and we mostly choose the three year. That's a little bit cheaper.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at the Cisco and we looked at the Palo Alto, but the SonicWall was the most valuable for the pricing, the best product for us. The main difference is the pricing.
What other advice do I have?
SonicWall NSa is a very good product with a very nice price, and it is low-level to use.
It is easy to manage and easy to implement.
On a scale of one to ten, I would give SonicWall NSa a nine because of the stability and the easy-to-use GUI. It's a very nice product.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Manager at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Everything is filtered, and if it detects an intruder, it drops the line
Pros and Cons
- "SonicWall has USCS and anti-virus at the gateway level. Everything is filtered, and if it detects an intruder, it drops the line."
- "We have security as a service, and they make recommendations about adding to the denylist and other things. That part could be more accessible and more user-friendly. I'd like to see SonicWall add a user-friendly interface where our internal team can drag and drop everything."
What is most valuable?
SonicWall has USCS and anti-virus at the gateway level. Everything is filtered, and if it detects an intruder, it drops the line.
What needs improvement?
We have security as a service, and they make recommendations about adding to the denylist and other things. That part could be more accessible and more user-friendly. I'd like to see SonicWall add a user-friendly interface where our internal team can drag and drop everything. We get the IOCs from the security companies, so these things can be filtered and blocked at the gateway level. They could add a feature where our team uploads the IOCs in an Excel spreadsheet instead of entering them in one at a time.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using SonicWall for almost seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Yeah, it is much stable and we have been using NSa the previous version before also, the old device. It's all so far okay. It's stable only.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We could expand by another 20 percent, and the product would still cover us. It shouldn't be a problem. We haven't faced many challenges. It's a gateway-level firewall product, and we have 140 users.
How are customer service and support?
SonicWall support is good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used Cisco a long time ago, but we moved to SonicWall almost eight years ago.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up SonicWall isn't that complicated, but you need to know the scope — what's allowed and what isn't. But it's not as complex as Cisco. The deployment takes a couple of days, but we could probably do it faster. We upgraded from the older version of SonicWall NSa to the latest appliance in less time.
It doesn't require a large team for maintenance. If we can manage it, anyone can. We only have three people on our team, and we can manage it without issue.
What about the implementation team?
We used the local redistributor here in Bahrain. They were knowledgeable and had SonicWall experience, so they didn't face much of a challenge. It was straightforward. The only difference is that we went with high availability — two devices.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have a yearly license. SonicWall's price is better than other vendors. We get a discount of about 15 percent off the initial cost.
What other advice do I have?
I rate SonicWall eight out of 10. I recommend it. If you implement SonicWall, it'll be a smooth journey.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Stable, easy to set up, has a UTM feature, and provides good support locally
Pros and Cons
- "For me, the most valuable feature of SonicWall NSa is the UTM."
- "A room for improvement in SonicWall NSa is the log server because it could be more user-friendly compared to Fortinet and Palo Alto Networks. My company has many rule sets up for review, so sometimes, my team needs to use Excel for filtering, but the UI cannot support the Excel function."
What is our primary use case?
I'm using SonicWall NSa as an external firewall.
What is most valuable?
For me, the most valuable feature of SonicWall NSa is the UTM.
What needs improvement?
A room for improvement in SonicWall NSa is the log server because it could be more user-friendly compared to Fortinet and Palo Alto Networks.
Another area for improvement is the UI of SonicWall NSa, mainly because the rule set is challenging to review, and you always have to export the rule set for review. My company has many rule sets up for review, so sometimes, my team needs to use Excel for filtering, but the UI cannot support the Excel function.
In the next release of SonicWall NSa, I want the solution to be more user-friendly.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been working with SonicWall NSa for more than ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
SonicWall NSa is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I am still determining how scalable SonicWall NSa is.
How are customer service and support?
SonicWall NSa support is fine overall. My company always gets help from the local vendor.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
My company used Check Point ten years ago, but its pricing was higher than SonicWall NSa. The cost to maintain Check Point was also higher, so now the company uses SonicWall NSa.
How was the initial setup?
SonicWall NSa is relatively easy to set up because my company always partners with local support.
It took one month to implement the solution because the company had to migrate from the old to the new, including checking the rule sets. I'm referring to upgrades because the deployment from scratch happened ten years ago, so I don't remember the details.
What about the implementation team?
An in-house team implemented SonicWall NSa together with a local support team.
What was our ROI?
My company has yet to evaluate any ROI from SonicWall NSa.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
SonicWall NSa has reasonable pricing. My company pays for it yearly, but I forgot how much the company pays. From what I remember, you only pay for the license fees.
What other advice do I have?
I believe I'm using the latest SonicWall NSa version, 2700, though I'm not sure.
My whole company in Hong Kong uses SonicWall NSa, so that's about one hundred people. Mainly two people maintain the solution.
A few people took care of the deployment of SonicWall NSa.
I rate SonicWall NSa as nine on a scale of one to ten.
I'm a SonicWall NSa user.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Last updated: Feb 6, 2023
Flag as inappropriate
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SonicWall NSa Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2023
Product Categories
FirewallsPopular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate
SonicWall TZ
Meraki MX
Cisco Secure Firewall
Sophos XG
WatchGuard Firebox
pfSense
OPNsense
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
Sophos UTM
Juniper SRX Series Firewall
Check Point NGFW
Zyxel Unified Security Gateway
Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
Stormshield Network Security
Buyer's Guide
Download our free SonicWall NSa Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Are you satisfied with Sonicwall NSA4600 in your installation?
- What is your opinion about these SonicWall Next-Generation firewalls: TZ and NSa series?
- Best Firewall for 300 user organisation: Sonicwall NSA 3650 vs. Sophos XG 310
- What do you recommend for a corporate firewall implementation?
- Comparison of Barracuda F800, SonicWall 5600 and Fortinet
- Sophos XG 210 vs Fortigate FG 100E
- Which is the best network firewall for a small retailer?
- When evaluating Firewalls, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cyberoam or Fortinet?
- Fortinet, Palo Alto or Check Point?