That is one of the great features. I was able to access the majority of the features and services for free.
The price of the solution is expensive.
That is one of the great features. I was able to access the majority of the features and services for free.
The price of the solution is expensive.
There are three levels of pricing: basic, plus, and apex. Basic satisfied our needs.
If you go directly with Cisco for the implementation it's very, very expensive.
There are three levels of pricing: basic, plus, and apex. Basic satisfied our needs.
If you go directly with Cisco for the implementation it's very, very expensive.
Actually the solution is very expensive. I don't know the particulars since the purchasing team dealt with it.
The pricing for this solution is on the higher end.
Actually the solution is very expensive. I don't know the particulars since the purchasing team dealt with it.
The pricing for this solution is on the higher end.
The pricing is an issue. It is expensive compared to other firewalls on the market.
Our monthly fee is around R3000.
The pricing is an issue. It is expensive compared to other firewalls on the market.
Our monthly fee is around R3000.
The price of Quad9 is free.
The price of Quad9 is free.
We have an educational licensing agreement. It's a customer agreement for multiple years.
This product is not expensive.
We have an educational licensing agreement. It's a customer agreement for multiple years.
This product is not expensive.
It is worth the cost.
Pricing is much higher compared to other solutions.
It is worth the cost.
Pricing is much higher compared to other solutions.
Pricing is a little expensive but it is affordable.
They should work on licensing costs.
Pricing is a little expensive but it is affordable.
They should work on licensing costs.
Sometimes there is a problem with the number of licenses for the end-user. The number of concurrent users is limited due to a valid license.
The pricing depends on the requirement, so proper planning and an RF analysis help to properly size the solution and get the best pricing.
Sometimes there is a problem with the number of licenses for the end-user. The number of concurrent users is limited due to a valid license.
The pricing depends on the requirement, so proper planning and an RF analysis help to properly size the solution and get the best pricing.
The price is not an issue for us, as it is priced more competitively than some other vendors.
If you compare with VeloCloud, the price is the same or even cheaper.
The price is not an issue for us, as it is priced more competitively than some other vendors.
If you compare with VeloCloud, the price is the same or even cheaper.
VeloCloud performs as well as the Cisco SD-WAN but it is cheaper in price.
The price of this solution is higher than that of other SD-WAN vendors.
VeloCloud performs as well as the Cisco SD-WAN but it is cheaper in price.
The price of this solution is higher than that of other SD-WAN vendors.
We have an enterprise license agreement with Microsoft. Their pricing is competitive. I would rate it a three and a half out of five.
The solution itself is free but you need to pay for the Microsoft Azure infrastructure and host your domains in Azure to use it.
We have an enterprise license agreement with Microsoft. Their pricing is competitive. I would rate it a three and a half out of five.
The solution itself is free but you need to pay for the Microsoft Azure infrastructure and host your domains in Azure to use it.
The price of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection could be reduced, it is expensive.
The solution is expensive.
The price of Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection could be reduced, it is expensive.
The solution is expensive.
The pricing depends on usage and is moderate.
The price of Amazon Route 53 is reasonable.
The pricing depends on usage and is moderate.
The price of Amazon Route 53 is reasonable.
The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price.
There is definitely an ROI.
The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price.
There is definitely an ROI.
I am not sure about the pricing. However, I can give you a rough estimate which is like ten cents per month per zone.
It is expensive but cost-effective.
I am not sure about the pricing. However, I can give you a rough estimate which is like ten cents per month per zone.
It is expensive but cost-effective.
It is a pretty expensive tool. It is maybe about $20,000 per year for a hundred users or so.
We pay $100 per user per month. One license for the site is around $17.
It is a pretty expensive tool. It is maybe about $20,000 per year for a hundred users or so.
We pay $100 per user per month. One license for the site is around $17.
Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost.
The biggest thing to watch for is the difference in price per monitored user for the different API integrations.
Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost.
The biggest thing to watch for is the difference in price per monitored user for the different API integrations.
Expensive, but with a good reseller you can get a very good price.
It is a well-priced option.
Expensive, but with a good reseller you can get a very good price.
It is a well-priced option.
The big advantage of this solution is that we can select the right model for our requirements, which is not too expensive.
Forcepoint is very expensive but it's really secure.
The big advantage of this solution is that we can select the right model for our requirements, which is not too expensive.
Forcepoint is very expensive but it's really secure.
It is less expensive than a Cisco solution.
It is around $50,000 per month.
It is less expensive than a Cisco solution.
It is around $50,000 per month.
Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing.
The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases.
Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing.
The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases.
There is an annual license for the solution and I am satisfied with the pricing.
It is not an expensive solution.
There is an annual license for the solution and I am satisfied with the pricing.
It is not an expensive solution.
It is a cost-effective solution.
It can be considered expensive, with a limited lifespan and support that eventually requires updating to newer solutions.
It is a cost-effective solution.
It can be considered expensive, with a limited lifespan and support that eventually requires updating to newer solutions.
It is expensive compared to one of its competitors.
It is expensive compared to one of its competitors.
The pricing is too high.
When you compare the price of this solution to the price of FortiGate, it's high.
The pricing is too high.
When you compare the price of this solution to the price of FortiGate, it's high.
In terms of cost, it is expensive. Its pricing has been a challenge for us since its acquisition by Broadcom.
It's expensive. Clients often go to other products.
In terms of cost, it is expensive. Its pricing has been a challenge for us since its acquisition by Broadcom.
It's expensive. Clients often go to other products.
We pay a licensing fee of $10,000 on a yearly basis.
The license model is based on the number of users. You have the possibility to have 10,000 users if you wish.
We pay a licensing fee of $10,000 on a yearly basis.
The license model is based on the number of users. You have the possibility to have 10,000 users if you wish.
The cost could be lower, though it is not currently prohibitive for larger companies.
The pricing is good. It's a substantial cost, but they've held their prices over the years, which has been good.
The cost could be lower, though it is not currently prohibitive for larger companies.
The pricing is good. It's a substantial cost, but they've held their prices over the years, which has been good.
The cost of this product is one of the reasons that we chose it.
NS1's pricing is much more aggressive than its competitors in the market and you get more value out of what you pay for it.
The cost of this product is one of the reasons that we chose it.
NS1's pricing is much more aggressive than its competitors in the market and you get more value out of what you pay for it.
The licensing is set up such that you pay for the number of active users that you're defending at the moment.
When you buy the subscription, there are no additional costs to add any additional buttons.
The licensing is set up such that you pay for the number of active users that you're defending at the moment.
When you buy the subscription, there are no additional costs to add any additional buttons.
Typically, the longer you price forward, the better off you're going to be. They have been very willing to work with us on pricing.
We have our pricing by user. We do our pricing agreements annually. There are also additional costs for maintenance.
Typically, the longer you price forward, the better off you're going to be. They have been very willing to work with us on pricing.
We have our pricing by user. We do our pricing agreements annually. There are also additional costs for maintenance.
I don't remember the exact pricing, but I think that it is approximately $10.00 per user.
The license is yearly and user based.
I don't remember the exact pricing, but I think that it is approximately $10.00 per user.
The license is yearly and user based.
The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment.
The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment.
Menlo Security RBI can be very costly.
Menlo Security RBI can be very costly.
Cost is a factor. It is really costly.
In some cases, it is expensive.
Cost is a factor. It is really costly.
In some cases, it is expensive.
It is appropriately priced for what they're doing for us. Considering the protection provided, I feel their pricing is spot-on.
It is appropriately priced for what they're doing for us. Considering the protection provided, I feel their pricing is spot-on.
Fortinet is very aggressive in its pricing.
Fortinet is very aggressive in its pricing.
Pricing and licensing is stunted and licensing is expensive. We have many customers who are now thinking about other solutions due to the cost.
There is an additional charge for advanced security features.
Pricing and licensing is stunted and licensing is expensive. We have many customers who are now thinking about other solutions due to the cost.
There is an additional charge for advanced security features.
Annual licenses cost $30 to $40 each.
I would rate Harmony Connect's pricing at six out of ten. It wasn't particularly expensive, but it wasn't super cheap either.
Annual licenses cost $30 to $40 each.
I would rate Harmony Connect's pricing at six out of ten. It wasn't particularly expensive, but it wasn't super cheap either.
Provided the features Akamai SPS Threat Avert provides, it is bound to be expensive.
Provided the features Akamai SPS Threat Avert provides, it is bound to be expensive.
The cost of operations is very low.
The cost of operations is very low.
This program is very, very expensive.
It is expensive. Licensing is on a yearly basis. You need to do the support subscription.
This program is very, very expensive.
It is expensive. Licensing is on a yearly basis. You need to do the support subscription.