Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Umbrella based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiGate, Cloudflare, and iboss.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Fortinet FortiGate appeals to cost-conscious buyers with excellent pricing and support. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella attracts with its advanced threat intelligence and cloud security. Tech buyers might choose FortiGate for affordability and on-premises security, while Cisco provides long-term value with cloud-centric features.
Fortinet FortiGate setup costs are generally more affordable, providing a cost-effective initial deployment, while Cisco Umbrella tends to have higher setup costs, reflecting its broader feature set.
Fortinet FortiGate setup costs are generally more affordable, providing a cost-effective initial deployment, while Cisco Umbrella tends to have higher setup costs, reflecting its broader feature set.
Cloudflare offers cost-effective CDN services and DDoS protection with simple deployment. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella's advanced threat intelligence and DNS-layer security justify a higher cost. Cloudflare is noted for its quick setup; Cisco Umbrella provides detailed support and sophisticated threat detection in its integration capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella impresses with its DNS protection and integration with Cisco Talos, ensuring network visibility and malware management. In comparison, iboss stands out with inline filtering and mental health features. Cisco offers comprehensive deployment options, while iboss excels in competitive pricing and intuitive interfaces.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is generally higher compared to iboss. However, iboss may offer more flexibility with lower initial investment requirements.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is generally higher compared to iboss. However, iboss may offer more flexibility with lower initial investment requirements.
Cisco Umbrella excels with enterprise-level features, offering extensive integration options and robust support, ideal for complex networks. In comparison, Quad9 appeals with its strong performance-to-cost ratio and straightforward deployment, making it suitable for budget-conscious organizations seeking simplicity and strong security.
Cisco Umbrella requires a significant setup investment, while Quad9 offers a more cost-effective setup solution, highlighting a major pricing difference between the two services.
Cisco Umbrella requires a significant setup investment, while Quad9 offers a more cost-effective setup solution, highlighting a major pricing difference between the two services.
Cisco Umbrella offers advanced DNS protection and secure web integration, making it suitable for networks prioritizing security enhancement. In comparison, Cloudflare One integrates DDoS protection and identity-aware proxy services, appealing to those seeking seamless integration and reliable performance.
Cisco Umbrella offers easy integration for DNS protection and rapid threat response. In comparison, Prisma Access provides comprehensive security with robust threat prevention. Tech buyers might choose Cisco for ease of use or Prisma for extensive application security capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella is known for its straightforward setup with reasonable costs, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks may involve higher setup expenses but offers robust security features.
Cisco Umbrella is known for its straightforward setup with reasonable costs, while Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks may involve higher setup expenses but offers robust security features.
Cisco Umbrella excels with DNS layer security, offering comprehensive domain tracking and filtering, which aids compliance. In comparison, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange focuses on a zero-trust model with seamless IDP integrations and VPN replacement, appealing to firms prioritizing zero-trust security.
Cisco Umbrella offers affordable initial setup costs, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform tends to be more expensive in its setup phase, reflecting different positioning and feature offerings.
Cisco Umbrella offers affordable initial setup costs, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform tends to be more expensive in its setup phase, reflecting different positioning and feature offerings.
Zscaler Internet Access offers robust website filtering and versatile cloud security, suitable for regions like the UAE. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella focuses on seamless DNS protection and cloud integration. A tech buyer might prefer Zscaler for scalability and Cisco for ease of use.
Zscaler Internet Access generally incurs higher setup costs compared to Cisco Umbrella, highlighting a significant cost difference in the initial deployment phase.
Zscaler Internet Access generally incurs higher setup costs compared to Cisco Umbrella, highlighting a significant cost difference in the initial deployment phase.
Cisco Umbrella offers DNS protection and robust cloud integration, ensuring seamless security. In comparison, Cato SASE Cloud Platform combines global SD-WAN with zero-trust networks. Tech buyers might choose Cisco for simplicity and threat intelligence, or Cato for comprehensive connectivity and security features.
Netskope excels in SaaS governance with granular control and extensive DLP features. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS-layer security and seamless integration with other Cisco solutions. A tech buyer might choose Netskope for SaaS management or Cisco Umbrella for comprehensive network security.
Cisco Umbrella excels with its robust DNS protection and seamless Cisco integration. In comparison, Check Point Harmony SASE emphasizes Zero Trust Network Access. Cisco is known for straightforward network integration, whereas Check Point offers extensive threat prevention and cloud-native capabilities for remote security focus.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) features a more structured pricing model, highlighting the difference in approach between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup cost, while Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) features a more structured pricing model, highlighting the difference in approach between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is competitive with efficient integration, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers a straightforward setup process. The pricing structures highlight distinct advantages, focusing on different aspects of value and deployment.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is competitive with efficient integration, while Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers a straightforward setup process. The pricing structures highlight distinct advantages, focusing on different aspects of value and deployment.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps excels in seamless integration within Microsoft environments but lacks flexibility with non-Microsoft platforms. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers strong DNS protection and traffic management. Defender maximizes Microsoft investments, while Umbrella simplifies deployment across diverse infrastructures.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps offers a low initial setup cost, making it more accessible, while Cisco Umbrella's higher setup cost may appeal to organizations prioritizing advanced features.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps offers a low initial setup cost, making it more accessible, while Cisco Umbrella's higher setup cost may appeal to organizations prioritizing advanced features.
Skyhigh Security offers comprehensive shadow IT capabilities, empowering better cloud control and visibility. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella emphasizes DNS protection and easy integration for secure remote work environments. Skyhigh suits those needing in-depth risk analysis, while Cisco appeals to those prioritizing seamless product integration.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust security with seamless integration across environments, making it ideal for diverse IT setups. In comparison, Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection delivers detailed IP management, suitable for enterprises needing comprehensive DNS solutions despite its complex configuration and higher cost.
Cisco Umbrella requires minimal setup cost, making it a cost-effective option, whereas Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection involves a higher setup expenditure, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella requires minimal setup cost, making it a cost-effective option, whereas Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection involves a higher setup expenditure, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS protection and easy integration with Cisco products, enhancing threat response. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager provides secure remote access with strong policy management. Tech buyers choose based on DNS protection versus remote access needs.
Cisco Umbrella offers a low setup cost with straightforward deployment, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) may require a higher investment and more complex configuration, highlighting a key difference in initial financial and technical commitment.
Cisco Umbrella offers a low setup cost with straightforward deployment, while F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) may require a higher investment and more complex configuration, highlighting a key difference in initial financial and technical commitment.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway excels in data retrieval and integration with DLP solutions. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS protection and threat intelligence. Forcepoint handles detailed reporting, while Cisco excels in user-friendly deployment and traffic redirection.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has a moderate setup cost, while Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is relatively low, highlighting distinct pricing strategies between the two solutions.
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway has a moderate setup cost, while Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is relatively low, highlighting distinct pricing strategies between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella excels in cloud-based architecture and integration, ideal for unified management. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks DNS Security offers robust command and control protection. A tech buyer might choose Umbrella for ease in cloud, while Palo Alto impresses with firewall integration.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is competitive, offering straightforward implementation, while Palo Alto Networks DNS Security incurs a higher initial expenditure with more comprehensive configuration requirements.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is competitive, offering straightforward implementation, while Palo Alto Networks DNS Security incurs a higher initial expenditure with more comprehensive configuration requirements.
Cisco Umbrella excels in network security with strong DNS protection and SecureX integration. In comparison, Perception Point Advanced Email Security focuses on advanced email threat detection using AI. Both offer robust choices, with Umbrella suited for network needs and Perception Point for email threats.
Cisco Umbrella has an easy setup with moderate costs, while Perception Point Advanced Email Security requires a more complex setup with higher initial costs.
Cisco Umbrella has an easy setup with moderate costs, while Perception Point Advanced Email Security requires a more complex setup with higher initial costs.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-layer security and integration within the Cisco ecosystem. In comparison, Heimdal Endpoint Security offers innovative threat prevention features like DarkLayer Guard. Cisco is praised for quick deployment, whereas Heimdal provides flexible options and advanced protection. Cisco is cost-effective, while Heimdal offers robust security.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is straightforward and potentially higher, while Heimdal Endpoint Security offers a more flexible pricing structure, emphasizing cost-efficiency.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is straightforward and potentially higher, while Heimdal Endpoint Security offers a more flexible pricing structure, emphasizing cost-efficiency.
Cisco Umbrella offers extensive DNS protection and integration for enhanced threat response. In comparison, Avast Business Hub excels in ease of deployment and endpoint protection. Cisco's premium features contrast with Avast's affordable pricing, each catering to different security needs.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup with minimal costs involved, whereas Avast Business Hub requires a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup with minimal costs involved, whereas Avast Business Hub requires a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS protection and seamless integration with Cisco Secure products. In comparison, Fortinet FortiProxy offers intensive web filtering and application control, appealing to organizations needing customized user policies. A tech buyer might choose Cisco for its broad threat network and Fortinet for detailed control.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is noted for its lower entry investment, while Fortinet FortiProxy presents a higher setup cost, emphasizing a more significant initial expenditure.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is noted for its lower entry investment, while Fortinet FortiProxy presents a higher setup cost, emphasizing a more significant initial expenditure.
Cisco Umbrella excels with robust DNS protection and seamless cloud integration. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE focuses on data loss prevention and Zero Trust Network Access, offering comprehensive data security. Each solution caters to distinct security needs, making them attractive for different organizational requirements.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more affordable initial investment, making it more accessible for businesses seeking cost-effective security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more affordable initial investment, making it more accessible for businesses seeking cost-effective security solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers comprehensive cloud-based security and ease of integration, making it ideal for businesses looking for quick deployment. In comparison, Menlo Protect provides advanced threat protection through isolation technology, appealing to those prioritizing superior security despite higher costs.
Cisco Umbrella reviews highlight a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Menlo Protect reviews indicate a more complex installation requiring higher initial investment.
Cisco Umbrella reviews highlight a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Menlo Protect reviews indicate a more complex installation requiring higher initial investment.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS-layer security and seamless integration with existing systems. In comparison, Axis Security, known for Zero Trust Network Access, offers advanced application encryption. Cisco's lower cost appeals to smaller enterprises, while Axis attracts those seeking detailed features and long-term ROI.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher setup cost, focusing on robust infrastructure, while Axis Security offers a more affordable setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users.
Cisco Umbrella has a higher setup cost, focusing on robust infrastructure, while Axis Security offers a more affordable setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users.
Menlo Secure offers cost-effective isolation-based security by executing web content remotely, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella provides advanced threat intelligence and robust DNS-layer security, appealing to those willing to invest in comprehensive, hassle-free protection.
Cisco Umbrella excels in support and pricing with DNS-layer security, offering ease of deployment. In comparison, NordLayer's superior features and Zero Trust architecture provide flexibility and integration, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing advanced security despite its higher cost and less consistent customer service.
Cisco Umbrella offers a low setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while NordLayer presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive features.
Cisco Umbrella offers a low setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while NordLayer presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive features.
Cisco Umbrella excels in comprehensive threat intelligence and seamless threat detection. In comparison, Akamai Edge DNS offers scalable, high-performance features. A tech buyer might choose Umbrella for user-friendly deployment, while Akamai appeals with customizable service and global traffic management.
Cisco Umbrella is chosen for its ease of use, centralization, threat intelligence, and DNS protection, appealing to those prioritizing integration. In comparison, Netskope offers a comprehensive security stack, making it ideal for buyers seeking advanced features like CASB and threat protection.
Cisco Umbrella offers competitive setup costs, whereas Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway may require higher initial investment, highlighting different target markets.
Cisco Umbrella offers competitive setup costs, whereas Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway may require higher initial investment, highlighting different target markets.
Cisco Umbrella offers DNS protection, robust integration, and effective threat intelligence, ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense focuses on detailed monitoring and DNS-based threat prevention. Tech buyers may prefer Cisco for user-friendliness and Infoblox for advanced DNS capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup process, while Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense involves a more intricate setup, highlighting a key difference in initial configuration complexity between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup process, while Infoblox BloxOne Threat Defense involves a more intricate setup, highlighting a key difference in initial configuration complexity between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella excels with DNS protection and traffic redirection, supported by Cisco Talos. In comparison, Symantec Proxy focuses on content inspection and SSL encryption. Cisco's cloud integration is strong, whereas Symantec is noted for its on-premises operation and comprehensive threat detection capabilities.
Cisco Umbrella excels with advanced DNS protection and threat intelligence integration. In comparison, TitanHQ WebTitan focuses on ease of deployment and straightforward content filtering. Cisco is chosen for its security integration, while TitanHQ appeals to those prioritizing simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS protection and threat intelligence, ideal for enhanced security with simple administration. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP DNS focuses on global server load balancing, offering high availability and performance, suiting enterprises with complex load management needs.
Cisco Umbrella offers competitive setup costs with streamlined implementation, while F5 BIG-IP DNS presents higher initial expenses with complex configuration.
Cisco Umbrella offers competitive setup costs with streamlined implementation, while F5 BIG-IP DNS presents higher initial expenses with complex configuration.
Cisco Umbrella excels in deployment speed and efficient integration, appealing to businesses seeking rapid implementation. In comparison, EfficientIP DNS Guardian provides a comprehensive feature set, ideal for enterprises valuing detailed security analysis and protection against specific DNS threats like zero-day attacks and tunneling.
Cisco Umbrella typically has lower setup costs and a simpler installation process, while EfficientIP DNS Guardian often involves higher initial expenses and a more complex configuration. This difference can influence the overall decision for budget-conscious users.
Cisco Umbrella typically has lower setup costs and a simpler installation process, while EfficientIP DNS Guardian often involves higher initial expenses and a more complex configuration. This difference can influence the overall decision for budget-conscious users.
Cisco Umbrella is known for its extensive threat intelligence and security features, appealing to tech buyers needing advanced protection. In comparison, DNSFilter offers a simpler, rapid deployment option with lower initial costs, ideal for organizations prioritizing ease of use and budget efficiency.
Cisco Umbrella excels with its comprehensive threat intelligence and predictive technology. In comparison, Barracuda SecureEdge highlights integration ease and centralized management. Cisco's long-term ROI and advanced features attract buyers, while Barracuda SecureEdge's cost-effectiveness suits those preferring straightforward, budget-friendly security options.
Cisco Umbrella attracts tech buyers with DNS-layer protection and affordability for fast ROI. In comparison, Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise focuses on advanced threat analysis and security customization, appealing to those seeking comprehensive features and long-term benefits despite higher initial costs.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is minimal, while Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in cost structure between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is minimal, while Akamai Secure Internet Access Enterprise involves a higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in cost structure between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella is noted for its competitive pricing, real-time threat monitoring, and easy integration, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Symantec Secure Web Gateway offers detailed policy management and comprehensive protection, making it attractive to those seeking extensive functionality.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup at a low cost, while Symantec Secure Web Gateway involves a more complex setup process and higher initial investment.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup at a low cost, while Symantec Secure Web Gateway involves a more complex setup process and higher initial investment.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS protection and integration, enhancing security and productivity. In comparison, Forcepoint CASB focuses on real-time control and cloud app visibility, catering to cloud management needs. Forcepoint's moderate pricing contrasts with Cisco's higher cost, offering different value propositions based on needs.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is generally lower, enabling quicker deployment, while Forcepoint CASB requires a higher initial investment but may offer more extensive features for larger organizations.
Cisco Umbrella's setup cost is generally lower, enabling quicker deployment, while Forcepoint CASB requires a higher initial investment but may offer more extensive features for larger organizations.
Cisco Umbrella excels in DNS protection, seamless Cisco integration, and detailed reporting. In comparison, Check Point Web Gateway offers strong URL filtering and customizable policies. Tech buyers might choose Umbrella for cloud flexibility, while others may prefer Check Point for its granular control and threat prevention.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup process with moderate costs, while Check Point Web Gateway involves a more complex setup, leading to potentially higher setup costs.
Cisco Umbrella has a straightforward setup process with moderate costs, while Check Point Web Gateway involves a more complex setup, leading to potentially higher setup costs.
Barracuda Web Security and Filtering offers cost-effective URL filtering and malware protection, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco Umbrella features advanced threat intelligence and DNS-layer security, justifying its higher cost for those needing comprehensive protection with a cloud-based solution.
Barracuda Web Security and Filtering features a straightforward setup, while Cisco Umbrella incurs higher initial costs. Barracuda provides economical installation with efficient deployment, whereas Cisco targets robust security features that demand a more substantial investment.
Barracuda Web Security and Filtering features a straightforward setup, while Cisco Umbrella incurs higher initial costs. Barracuda provides economical installation with efficient deployment, whereas Cisco targets robust security features that demand a more substantial investment.
Cisco Umbrella offers robust DNS protection with seamless Cisco SecureX integration, simplifying network security. In comparison, BlueCat Edge emphasizes efficient DNS routing and security policy enforcement. Buyers may prefer Cisco for comprehensive security features, while BlueCat offers flexible deployment and detailed DNS insights.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas BlueCat Edge involves a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a key difference in setup investment between the two solutions.
Cisco Umbrella offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas BlueCat Edge involves a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a key difference in setup investment between the two solutions.
