Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo

Top 10 Oracle Application Testing Suite Alternatives

Vendor: Oracle
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Oracle Application Testing Suite based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, OpenText Functional Testing, and Apache JMeter. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Oracle Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Oracle, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
Tricentis Tosca provides a scriptless approach and broad platform integration, ideal for complex testing tasks. In comparison, Oracle Application Testing Suite integrates well with Oracle applications and offers strong load testing. Tricentis suits diverse environments, while Oracle is cost-effective for existing Oracle users.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis Tosca Report
Tricentis Tosca typically incurs higher setup costs, while Oracle Application Testing Suite offers a more economical option. This cost difference highlights distinct financial considerations when choosing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis Tosca typically incurs higher setup costs, while Oracle Application Testing Suite offers a more economical option. This cost difference highlights distinct financial considerations when choosing between the two solutions.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
OpenText Functional Testing
4.0 out of 5
OpenText Functional Testing excels in supporting diverse technologies like Oracle and SAP, offering robust frameworks for various applications. In comparison, Oracle Application Testing Suite's strength lies in its seamless integration with Oracle environments, making it ideal for businesses heavily using Oracle ERP systems.
Download OpenText Functional Testing vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report
OpenText Functional Testing typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Application Testing Suite, which may have higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Functional Testing typically incurs a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Application Testing Suite, which may have higher upfront expenses.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Apache JMeter
3.9 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Apache JMeter
3.9 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite offers seamless Oracle integration and robust automation. In comparison, Apache JMeter provides open-source flexibility with wide platform compatibility, making it ideal for budget-conscious testing. Both serve different testing needs with unique strengths and deployment options.
Download Apache JMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite involves a higher setup cost compared to Apache JMeter, which is often favored for its minimal initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite involves a higher setup cost compared to Apache JMeter, which is often favored for its minimal initial investment.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
SmartBear TestComplete
3.8 out of 5
SmartBear TestComplete is ideal for those needing cross-platform automation and advanced debugging capabilities. In comparison, Oracle Application Testing Suite appeals to users valuing seamless Oracle integration and load testing features, making it suitable for Oracle-centric environments requiring robust automation solutions.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. SmartBear TestComplete Report
SmartBear TestComplete has lower setup costs, offering budget-friendly pricing, while Oracle Application Testing Suite tends to be more expensive due to its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
SmartBear TestComplete has lower setup costs, offering budget-friendly pricing, while Oracle Application Testing Suite tends to be more expensive due to its comprehensive features.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite offers strong Oracle application integration and comprehensive end-to-end testing for Oracle environments. In comparison, Tricentis NeoLoad provides broad cloud and on-premises deployment support, appealing to diverse IT setups with quick script creation and real-time monitoring capabilities.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite has a straightforward setup cost that varies based on features, while Tricentis NeoLoad offers a more flexible pricing model tailored to user requirements. These differences highlight distinct pricing structures for each tool.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite has a straightforward setup cost that varies based on features, while Tricentis NeoLoad offers a more flexible pricing model tailored to user requirements. These differences highlight distinct pricing structures for each tool.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Perfecto
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Perfecto
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite excels in comprehensive testing for Oracle ERP with robust performance monitoring. In comparison, Perfecto, with its cloud-based architecture, suits cross-platform mobile testing and offers real device handling, providing flexibility and extensive cloud capabilities.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Perfecto Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Perfecto, which requires a higher investment at the outset.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Perfecto, which requires a higher investment at the outset.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
BlazeMeter
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
BlazeMeter
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite appeals to those embedded in the Oracle ecosystem with its strong automation capabilities and cost-effective licensing. In comparison, BlazeMeter attracts users seeking cloud-based, scalable solutions with broad open-source tool support and flexible pricing models.
Download BlazeMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite has a higher setup cost, while BlazeMeter offers a more economical alternative, appealing to budget-conscious users looking for efficient testing solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite has a higher setup cost, while BlazeMeter offers a more economical alternative, appealing to budget-conscious users looking for efficient testing solutions.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional)
4.2 out of 5
OpenText LoadRunner Professional offers a robust scripting engine and extensive protocol support for complex testing, appealing to those requiring detailed analysis. In comparison, Oracle Application Testing Suite integrates seamlessly with Oracle applications, providing an efficient automation framework suitable for Oracle-centric environments.
Download OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) has a straightforward setup process, making it accessible for quick deployment, while Oracle Application Testing Suite involves a more complex setup that might require additional resources and planning.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) has a straightforward setup process, making it accessible for quick deployment, while Oracle Application Testing Suite involves a more complex setup that might require additional resources and planning.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Selenium HQ
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Selenium HQ
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite offers automation for Oracle-compatible scenarios, prioritizing integration and performance. In comparison, Selenium HQ, an open-source tool, supports diverse languages and platforms, appealing to those needing flexible web-based testing, though it may require skilled personnel for optimal use.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Selenium HQ Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite requires a significant initial setup investment, whereas Selenium HQ offers a lower barrier to entry in terms of cost, highlighting a key financial distinction between the two testing solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite requires a significant initial setup investment, whereas Selenium HQ offers a lower barrier to entry in terms of cost, highlighting a key financial distinction between the two testing solutions.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Worksoft Certify
4.2 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Worksoft Certify
4.2 out of 5
Worksoft Certify excels in no-code automation for SAP systems with a focus on data management. In comparison, Oracle Application Testing Suite offers broader performance testing, supporting various Oracle solutions with integration benefits, making them suitable for Oracle-centric environments.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Worksoft Certify Report
Worksoft Certify has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Application Testing Suite, making it a more budget-friendly option. Oracle offers robust features which can justify its higher initial investment for those prioritizing comprehensive testing capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Worksoft Certify has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Application Testing Suite, making it a more budget-friendly option. Oracle offers robust features which can justify its higher initial investment for those prioritizing comprehensive testing capabilities.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Ranorex Studio
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Ranorex Studio
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite integrates seamlessly with Oracle products, offering automation and performance tools like OpenScript. In comparison, Ranorex Studio provides flexibility with C# scripting and broad application support. OATS is cost-effective, while Ranorex offers extensive features for higher initial costs.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Ranorex Studio Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite often incurs higher setup costs, while Ranorex Studio typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Users may notice a significant difference in the budget required for each solution's implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite often incurs higher setup costs, while Ranorex Studio typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Users may notice a significant difference in the budget required for each solution's implementation.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)
4.1 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite integrates well within Oracle ecosystems, enhancing automation for Oracle EBS users. In comparison, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud enables high scalability with cloud options, appealing to businesses seeking flexible, dynamic performance testing without infrastructure limits.
Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite incurs a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud). This difference highlights a key pricing distinction between the two software solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite incurs a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud). This difference highlights a key pricing distinction between the two software solutions.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
4.2 out of 5
LoadRunner Enterprise excels in scalability with robust scheduling and diverse protocol support. In comparison, Oracle Application Testing Suite offers ease of use with strong Oracle application integration and flexible licensing, making it ideal for companies already invested in Oracle technologies. LoadRunner requires higher initial investment but provides extensive insights.
Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) offers a competitive setup cost ideal for organizations scaling their engineering needs, while Oracle Application Testing Suite incurs higher initial costs but provides comprehensive testing tools within its package.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) offers a competitive setup cost ideal for organizations scaling their engineering needs, while Oracle Application Testing Suite incurs higher initial costs but provides comprehensive testing tools within its package.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
k6 Open Source
3.8 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
k6 Open Source
3.8 out of 5
Oracle Application Testing Suite offers extensive test management and analytics, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, k6 Open Source excels in performance testing with powerful scripting and CI/CD integration, providing a scalable solution. Both cater to distinct testing needs and budgets.
Download Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. k6 Open Source Report
Oracle Application Testing Suite has an upfront setup cost while k6 Open Source offers a lower-cost setup option, highlighting a significant distinction between the two solutions in terms of budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Testing Suite has an upfront setup cost while k6 Open Source offers a lower-cost setup option, highlighting a significant distinction between the two solutions in terms of budget considerations.
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
Oracle Application Testing Suite Logo
IBM Engineering Test Management
3.8 out of 5
IBM Engineering Test Management integrates with engineering workflows, offering strong collaboration tools and seamless cross-tool integration. In comparison, Oracle Application Testing Suite delivers comprehensive test automation capabilities. Tech buyers may prefer IBM for its integration, while Oracle suits those prioritizing robust testing features.
Download IBM Engineering Test Management vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report
IBM Engineering Test Management offers lower setup costs while Oracle Application Testing Suite involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a notable difference in financial commitment between these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Engineering Test Management offers lower setup costs while Oracle Application Testing Suite involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a notable difference in financial commitment between these solutions.

Related categories

Performance Testing Tools
Functional Testing Tools
Load Testing Tools