OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.4, while Oracle is ranked #13. OpenText holds a 7.8% mindshare in PTT, compared to Oracle’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 47 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

3,852 Views
3,005 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

2,360 Views
684 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Oracle Application Testing Suite and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud compete in the performance testing solutions category. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features that many users find worth the premium price.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides extensive automation capabilities with seamless integrations within Oracle’s ecosystem. It supports functional, performance, and automation testing across diverse Oracle applications. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers scalable, cloud-based load testing that efficiently handles high-volume transactions and supports numerous protocols with flexibility for global deployment.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve its object identification, browser compatibility, and script flexibility, with issues noted in Oracle-specific integrations and technical support timelines. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud requires enhancements in analysis depth, technical support responsiveness, and script conversion capabilities, alongside improvements in CI/CD and reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite is primarily on-premises but provides reliable if occasionally slow technical support. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers flexibility with cloud deployment options; however, it too has technical support delays. The cloud model simplifies deployment but can present integration challenges.

Pricing and ROI: OATS is generally less expensive, especially when used within an Oracle-centric ecosystem, offering free functional testing and cost-effective bundling with Oracle products. LoadRunner Cloud, though priced higher, gives flexibility through a pay-as-you-go model, and its cloud infrastructure offsets maintenance costs, delivering strong ROI potential despite the initial expense.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 7.8%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.9%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	7.8%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.9%
Other	89.3%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Jyoti Ranjan Behera

Performance Test Analyst at Sensata Technologies

User-friendly features facilitate monitoring while support could be more responsive

I am satisfied with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as a product, but the ticket resolution time is concerning. The technical personnel are not able to fix issues quickly, which becomes problematic during critical situations. Compared to previous support, I notice that while experts previously resolved issues immediately, current experts take more time to resolve issues, which is the main challenge we are facing. They are now lacking regional support, which takes more time than it used to. My suggestions for improvements to OpenText LoadRunner Cloud would be to have specific experts available who can resolve issues more quickly, as delays can impact project timelines significantly.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"StormRunner does the job in a very simple and cost effective way."

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud eliminates the need for our own testing infrastructure when running tests."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the Vuser license; it allows us to reduce the cost as per requirement."

"The TCO has been optimized along with the total ROI."

"The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it."

"It's the license and structure because it's so dynamic."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

"This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"This product can facilitate the lowering of test execution times for operational people, as the bulk of the repeating test steps can be taken away by automating the EBS regression set in OpenScript every release."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"The best feature of this and Load Test is simplicity."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"I faced issues with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud support when a problem took three to four months to resolve, which negatively impacted our project, especially when key team members were unavailable during leave periods."

"Improvements to the reporting would be good."

"One area of improvement in the software's support is the replaying of captured data within the development environment. It would be beneficial if the replay feature could accurately mimic what the actual application is doing for better analysis and testing."

"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

"We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols."

"Sometimes, you are utilizing one of the low generators, then all of a sudden if you discontinue from one project, it actually deletes the entire low generator."

"StormRunner is very rudimentary at this time, but it's a great concept."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

"The tool runs out of memory when the recording flows are long and involve many screens despite increasing the memory settings for OpenScript."

"There is one piece of functionality that is currently not offered and would be very good to have: Support for Digital Certificates authentication and Single Sign-On (SSO)."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"The test installation pretty much destroyed my computer’s laptop performance."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"Performance is slow as compared to other tools like QTP."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"The solution is expensive."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	30

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

As for the pricing of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), I find it quite expensive compared to other products in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

Regarding improvements in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud), the initial configuration where we have to set up orchestration is something that could be improved. If they make...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 7% of the time

Appvance AIQ Platform vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

April 2026

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

OATS

Overview

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

April 2026

Free Report: OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.