BlazeMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Perforce and Oracle are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9, while Oracle is ranked #15. Perforce holds a 8.6% mindshare in PTT, compared to Oracle’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,217 Views
3,542 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,377 Views
358 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and BlazeMeter compete in the realm of software testing solutions, specifically focusing on functional and performance testing. While Oracle stands out with its Oracle-specific capabilities and integration, BlazeMeter leads with its cloud-based, open-source integrations and large-scale testing flexibility.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides robust automation capabilities with integrated functional and performance testing modules built on Eclipse IDE. It excels in managing Oracle environments and script development. BlazeMeter offers cloud-based load testing, supports JMeter integration, and provides real-time analytics, making it ideal for global scale load generation and open-source tool integrations.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve object identification, enhance performance, and expand support for non-Oracle products and browsers. BlazeMeter users desire better scalability, more flexible pricing, enhanced APM tool integration, and improved scheduling and metric accuracy.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle's suite supports on-premises and hybrid deployments with highly rated technical support. BlazeMeter, as a cloud-first tool, offers easy deployment with hybrid options, though its customer service sometimes receives mixed reviews for response times.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers competitive pricing often within Oracle bundles, leading to significant ROI through its deep integration. BlazeMeter's consumption-based pricing is seen as flexible but potentially expensive, balanced by its scalability and open-source tool advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

15th

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 8.6%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BlazeMeter	8.6%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.0%
Other	89.4%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using cloud-based load generators is highly valuable to us, as we can test from outside our network and increase load generation without having to upscale our hardware as much. The cloud load generator is there when we need it and is the feature we leverage the most."

"For me, the best part is that we can graphically see the test result at runtime. It helps us understand the behavior of the application during all stages of the test."

"It is a stable solution. When we compare BlazeMeter with other tools in the market, I can say that the solution's overall performance has also been very good in our company."

"The orchestration feature is the most valuable. It's like the tourist backend component of BlazeMeter. It allows me to essentially give BlazeMeter multiple JMeter scripts and a YAML file, and it will orchestrate and execute that load test and all those scripts as I define them."

"BlazeMeter's most valuable feature is its cloud-based platform for performance testing."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based nature, which allows us to conduct tests without relying on local resources."

"The product's initial setup phase was simple."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

More BlazeMeter pros

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"The solution is scalable."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"Integration with APM tools like Dynatrace or AppDynamics needs to be improved."

"Having more options for customization would be helpful."

"Potential areas for improvement could include pricing, configuration, setup, and addressing certain limitations."

"The performance could be better. When reviewing finished cases, it sometimes takes a while for BlazeMeter to load. That has improved recently, but it's still a problem with unusually large test cases. The same goes for editing test cases. When editing test cases, it starts to take a long time to open those action groups and stuff."

"The Timeline Report panel has no customization options. One feature that I missed was not having a time filter, which I had in ELK. For example, there are only filter requests for a time of less than 5 seconds."

"The scanning capability needs improvement."

"BlazeMeter needs more granular access control. Currently, BlazeMeter controls everything at a workspace level, so a user can view or modify anything inside that workspace depending on their role. It would be nice if there was a more granular control where you could say, "This person can only do A, B, and C," or, "This user only has access to functional testing. This user only has access to mock services." That feature set doesn't currently exist."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

More BlazeMeter cons

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

"When compared with the cost of the licenses of other tools, BlazeMeter's license price is good."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"My company has opted for a pay-as-you-go model, so we don't make use of the free version of the product."

"The pricing is manageable. It is not that big. Big companies won't mind the licensing costs."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"The licensing fees are billed on a monthly basis and they cost approximately $100 for the basic plan."

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Government

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 41% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

September 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

OATS

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2025

Free Report: BlazeMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlazeMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.