Oracle Application Testing Suite vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Oracle and Tricentis are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #14, while Tricentis is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 2.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to Tricentis’s 14.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

3,736 Views
1,046 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis NeoLoad

Read 68 Tricentis NeoLoad reviews

8,518 Views
6,985 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Tricentis NeoLoad

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Oracle Application Testing Suite and Tricentis NeoLoad are both in the realm of application testing solutions, addressing various user needs. Based on data comparisons, Tricentis NeoLoad holds the upper hand with its advanced performance testing and reporting capabilities, despite higher perceived costs.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers recorded scripting automation, stable support for Oracle EBS Applications, and integration with Oracle products through features like Open Script and Oracle Test Manager. Tricentis NeoLoad provides excellent load test execution, easy scripting, CI/CD integration, robust scaling, and results reporting.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite needs better cross-browser compatibility, desktop application support, and flexible script reuse. Tricentis NeoLoad could improve its third-party tool integration, expand protocol support, and provide more comprehensive documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with responsive technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad provides public and private cloud options, with proactive technical support and suggestions for improved customer service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is known for competitive pricing and accessible licensing, delivering strong ROI when used in Oracle environments. Tricentis NeoLoad, while less economical, offers a flexible licensing model and is regarded as cost-effective against high-end options like LoadRunner, with a positive ROI due to its scalability and integration features.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (27th)

Tricentis NeoLoad

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis NeoLoad is 14.1%, up from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis NeoLoad	14.1%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.5%
Other	83.4%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

AnantJoshi

Senior Director Intelligent Automation at Truglobal

Performance testing has delivered diverse global retail loads and generates clear diagnostic reports

I did not notice any weak points or downsides in Tricentis NeoLoad except for the cost. Everything else is good with the tool. When I consider that service customers have to pay the cost for the load generation, I find that the cost increases, especially when I want to generate a load for a global customer with different loads in different regions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Now I feel its the best tool to automate any of the Oracle Products, which include Oracle EBS Applications, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, Adobe Flex, ADF applications, etc.."

"Overall, Oracle Application Testing Suite is very easy to use and you can create a good framework for developing and testing."

"Helps us to reduce the workload to check the system."

"Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"The best feature of this and Load Test is simplicity."

"The Product as a whole is an integrated package with excellent co-relation with all Oracle Applications and any web-based application."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"OATS provides the functionality to institute a corporate-wide standardized method and approach for all types of application testing."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis."

"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to."

"The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."

"From a functional perspective, the range of tools provided with Tricentis NeoLoad is perhaps the widest."

"This tool is easy to use and requires little code implementation thanks to many predefined areas."

"We are able to create load test scripts quickly in a fast paced environment, which in turn helps us identify performance issues."

"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."

"The reporting features are great."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pros

Cons

"There is one piece of functionality that is currently not offered and would be very good to have: Support for Digital Certificates authentication and Single Sign-On (SSO)."

"The test installation pretty much destroyed my computer’s laptop performance."

"We have stability issues with the server logging off when a script runs from OTM."

"Transaction handling was very simple and I’d say quite primitive."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"The overall stability of the GUI should be improved. The GUI component is not stable enough. We have observed crashes several times."

"However, they need to offer more protocol support."

"It's straightforward to install and configure, but complex to convert scripts from a previous product to work in NeoLoad."

"It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be."

"It needs to support SAP GUI-based applications, which forms 60-70% of our portfolio, as well as Windows (client install) and Citrix-based applications."

"LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols."

"NeoLoad can improve the correlation templates, which are specific to frameworks. There's room for improvement in that area."

"Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts."

More Tricentis NeoLoad cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The tool's pricing is somewhat higher than licensed tools like LoadRunner. The approximate cost is around $25,000. There are no additional charges for maintenance or support. Everything is included in the package we have."

"Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

"Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner."

"NeoLoad now has a much more flexible licensing process."

"The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools."

"Tricentis NeoLoad price is a benefit of using this tool, it is less expensive than some of the other solutions."

"The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing."

"It is cheaper than other solutions."

More Tricentis NeoLoad pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user104961

Penetration and Neoload Tester at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Apr 13, 2014

LoadRunner vs NeoLoad

The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Tricentis NeoLoad?

I highly recommend Tricentis NeoLoad for companies that are in need of a versatile load and performance testing tool. This relatively inexpensive solution is recognized by organizations like Oxford...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neotys NeoLoad?

Tricentis NeoLoad use cases were for retail, specifically a US based retail customer.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tricentis NeoLoad?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 2% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 47% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 6% of the time

UBIK Load Pack vs Tricentis NeoLoad

Compared 1% of the time

More Tricentis NeoLoad Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

October 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis NeoLoad

October 2026

Download Tricentis NeoLoad product report

Also Known As

OATS

NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad

Overview

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Tricentis NeoLoad is designed for performance and load testing, allowing teams to collaborate effectively, even across different locations. Its user-centric interface supports various protocols and seamlessly integrates with tools like Jenkins and Tableau.

Tricentis NeoLoad streamlines performance testing by offering an adaptable environment for distributed teams. The tool is noted for its comprehensive analysis capabilities, user-friendly interface, and support for mobile and cloud testing. It also provides cost-effective scalability compared to competitors such as LoadRunner. However, areas for improvement include enhanced protocol support, interface and reporting upgrades, and better integration with CI/CD pipelines. Users have noted stability issues with large projects and challenges with concurrent script editing. Enhancing customer service, licensing options, and documentation could further improve user experience.

What features make Tricentis NeoLoad stand out?

Team Collaboration: Enables simultaneous work across different locations.
Comprehensive Insights: Custom graph options for detailed analysis.
User-Centric Design: Simplifies scripting without extensive coding knowledge.
Protocol Support: Facilitates mobile, web, and cloud-based testing.
Tool Integration: Works seamlessly with Jenkins, Tableau, and others.
Scalability and Monitoring: Supports real-time monitoring and API integration.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: More affordable than some competitors while offering scalable solutions.
Improved Testing Accuracy: Real-world simulation of multi-user scenarios.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports both on-premise and SaaS models.
Enhanced Application Performance: Monitors system behavior effectively.

Tricentis NeoLoad is primarily utilized in web application and SAP GUI testing, focusing on performance in QA and production settings. It supports real-world simulation for web services and APIs, proving especially beneficial in industries demanding robust system behavior monitoring and application scaling. Catering to on-premise and SaaS deployments, it integrates into CI/CD pipelines, enhancing testing efficiency across sectors.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

October 2026

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.