BrowserStack vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

BrowserStack and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #25. BrowserStack holds a 10.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

4,859 Views
4,470 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,377 Views
785 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Oracle Application Testing Suite and BrowserStack compete in the software testing category. Oracle excels in test automation for Oracle and Java applications, while BrowserStack leads in cross-browser testing for diverse devices, offering a broader platform range.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers robust automation, performance, and test management capabilities tailored for Oracle environments, integrating management tools for scalability in large projects. BrowserStack provides extensive testing across a wide array of devices and browsers, emphasizing manual and real-device testing for extensive compatibility and performance assessments.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve its object identification, performance speed, and integration with non-Oracle products while enhancing installation intuitiveness. BrowserStack requires enhancements in speed and local testing connectivity, alongside improvements in pricing and stability during multi-device testing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite is primarily deployed on-premises, offering rapid technical support beneficial for urgent issues. BrowserStack allows flexible deployment in public and private cloud settings, yet receives mixed feedback on customer service response times. Oracle tends to resolve critical requests more swiftly.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is deemed cost-effective, especially when used with other Oracle products, yielding a positive ROI due to its competitive pricing and integration features. BrowserStack is perceived as more expensive, though it offers flexible per-user licenses, providing value for large testing needs. Both show good ROI, with BrowserStack highlighting its user-specific cost benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (15th), Load Testing Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.0%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BrowserStack	10.0%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.4%
Other	88.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable."

"Maintenance of the solution is easy."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

"The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."

"The integration is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."

More BrowserStack pros

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"The solution is scalable."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"Occasionally, there are disruptions in the connection which can interfere with our testing processes, especially when testing on phones."

"We are struggling to do local testing."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."

"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."

"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."

"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."

"BrowserStack is very expensive and they keep increasing their cost, which is absolutely ridiculous, especially when someone like LambdaTest is coming through for literal thousands of dollars less, with the same services."

More BrowserStack cons

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"The price is fine."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Government

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LambdaTest vs BrowserStack

Compared 32% of the time

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 24% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

SoftLogica WAPT Pro vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

October 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

OATS

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.