Oct 14, 2014
OATS is built for the Oracle suite of apps including Webservices for Oracle EBS. If that is your primary focus, it's hard to beat OATS for that one purpose.
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and Oracle Application Testing Suite compete in the domain of performance testing tools. OpenText seems to have the upper hand due to its robust analytics and comprehensive protocol support, while Oracle is praised for its seamless integration with Oracle products.
Features: OpenText Professional Performance Engineering supports extensive protocols and flexible scripting capabilities, enabling complex performance testing and detailed analytics. Its load simulation is highlighted as effective for various applications. Oracle Application Testing Suite integrates seamlessly with Oracle products, automates test cases efficiently, and offers a comprehensive solution for both functional and performance testing. It is especially beneficial for Oracle-centric environments.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could simplify its scripting process and improve protocol guidance. Users cite complexity in set-up and high pricing as drawbacks. Enhancing reporting and modern tech support can enhance user satisfaction. Oracle Testing Suite needs better cross-browser support and simpler integration processes. Improved documentation and support for non-Oracle apps could broaden its appeal.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText allows flexible deployment options, with both on-premises and cloud environments. However, technical support quality varies. Oracle Testing Suite, mainly on-premises, offers hybrid cloud options and generally good customer service, though its technical support invites improvement.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is known for high costs based on protocol type and virtual users, yet it offers significant ROI when extensively used. A community edition makes it more accessible for smaller tests. Oracle Testing Suite is more affordable, especially for Oracle clients, with competitive pricing. Its ROI is boosted by asset reusability and Oracle integration, making it cost-effective for Oracle-focused businesses.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 13.7% |
| Oracle Application Testing Suite | 2.1% |
| Other | 84.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 65 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
