

Oracle Application Testing Suite and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers are two advanced testing platforms. User reviews suggest Oracle Application Testing Suite holds an advantage in Oracle application support and ease of use, while OpenText excels in compatibility with a diverse range of development tools.
Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides a comprehensive suite tailored for automation and performance testing supporting Oracle integrations. It delivers flexibility and scalability within Oracle environments. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers advanced integration with multiple development environments and is noted for cross-platform support.
Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could enhance object identification and performance in complex Oracle ERP scenarios, including broader browser support. OpenText Functional Testing needs improvements in stability, CI/CD integration, and object recognition across various platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite is preferred for its robust support within Oracle's ecosystem and responsive technical support, benefiting users deeply integrated with Oracle projects. OpenText Functional Testing offers versatile deployment options but requires more technical self-management due to less immediate support.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is perceived as cost-effective, offering competitive pricing, especially when bundled with other Oracle products, though advanced support incurs additional costs. OpenText has a more intricate pricing model due to its versatility, with higher licensing costs. Both tools provide positive ROI, with Oracle Application Testing Suite noted for delivering quicker returns in Oracle-heavy environments.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| Oracle Application Testing Suite | 1.6% |
| Other | 95.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.