Oracle Application Testing Suite vs SmartBear TestComplete comparison

Oracle and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Oracle is ranked #26, while SmartBear is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5. Oracle holds a 1.5% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

2,982 Views
1,730 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 76 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

8,676 Views
5,553 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

SmartBear TestComplete

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

SmartBear TestComplete and Oracle Application Testing Suite are prominent competitors in the test automation software category. SmartBear TestComplete holds an advantage due to its flexible scripting options and data-driven testing, appealing to a broader range of users.

Features: SmartBear TestComplete provides dynamic object recognition and cross-platform automation using scripting languages like Python and JavaScript, making it adaptable for various environments. It excels in data-driven testing, leveraging its integration capabilities with tools like Selenium and Azure DevOps. Oracle Application Testing Suite is geared towards Oracle ERP testing, integrating functional and performance testing with its intuitive OpenScript scripting and detailed reporting features.

Room for Improvement: SmartBear TestComplete needs improvement in its intuitiveness for web and mobile testing frameworks compared to Selenium, along with addressing licensing and limited language support issues. Oracle Application Testing Suite could benefit from enhanced integration with modern technologies, streamlined setup processes, and better documentation and cross-browser support for non-Oracle ERP products.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions mainly offer on-premises deployments, with Oracle also providing a hybrid cloud option. SmartBear's technical support is generally seen as responsive with active community forums, though response efficiency can be improved. Oracle's support is satisfactory but sometimes struggles with unresolved issues. Both face challenges in quickly escalating and resolving technical matters.

Pricing and ROI: SmartBear TestComplete offers moderate flexible licensing, though seen as costly compared to open-source tools like Selenium. Users find value in the time saved during testing, aligning with its competitive pricing. Oracle Application Testing Suite provides competitive pricing with customizable licensing, considered cost-effective for Oracle-centric environments with significant ROI in integrated testing solutions across ERP applications.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. SmartBear TestComplete Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. SmartBear TestComplete

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th), Load Testing Tools (17th)

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 4.7%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SmartBear TestComplete	4.7%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.5%
Other	93.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"The solution is scalable."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"It's user friendly and in-built API support makes it very easy to automate or develop an automation framework."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"The best feature of this and Load Test is simplicity."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

"The solution's most valuable aspect is how easy it is to create tests."

"Object spy and object recognition are working very well, giving us a lot of possibilities."

"TestComplete is a good product compared to other options that are on the market."

"TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good."

"It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems."

"Price-wise, feature-wise, its ability to integrate with other products, and of course, scalability-wise, it's great."

"Even with my limited programming knowledge, I was able to create automation tests using the Keyword Test feature."

"The solution has a very nice interface."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

Cons

"WebForms works fine, but scripting in the EBS forms option isn't very consistent and stable."

"There is one piece of functionality that is currently not offered and would be very good to have: Support for Digital Certificates authentication and Single Sign-On (SSO)."

"We have stability issues with the server logging off when a script runs from OTM."

"Performance is slow as compared to other tools like QTP."

"OATS has some promising features that frankly we wish we could utilize, but so far we haven’t had much luck doing so."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

"The tool sometimes seems a little unstable and crashes sometimes on Windows 10."

"The solution doesn't have a very flexible pricing model."

"The artificial intelligence needs to be improved."

"There could be API interfaces with this tool."

"If that engine could better identify more XPaths automatically and make the process more flexible, that would be better."

"TestComplete gives support to do requests to a SOAP web service but has no support to do HTTP requests on Restful services."

"LoadComplete could be a little more user-friendly, but is still better than LoginVSI."

"I have used it for Web Application automation and sometimes find difficulties while recognizing dynamically-generated runtime object."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The solution is around $1500. Some are perpetual licenses, and some get a yearly report card."

"The solution's licensing cost has increased because it has moved to some new SLM-based licenses."

"The price of SmartBear TestComplete could be less. The main challenge is when it comes to node-locked. They should use a subscription model, such as a monthly-based subscription or, a quarterly-based subscription. Their floating license is very expensive, and this high price should be reduced or provide, at a minimum, a subscription model."

"My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it."

"It costs a few hundred per year, but I am not sure. It is not at all expensive as compared to other tools."

"The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive."

"TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module."

"Overall, for us, the cost of the TestComplete platform and the three extra modules is around $8,000."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I am not involved in pricing or licensing; our management team handles these aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature. Occasion...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SmartBear TestComplete?

We are using SmartBear TestComplete ( /products/smartbear-testcomplete-reviews ) for automation over applications.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

BrowserStack vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 2% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 3% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

July 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

July 2026

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Also Known As

OATS

No data available

Overview

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.

SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.

What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?

Object Browser and Object Spy: Provides deep inspection and interaction capabilities within applications.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with third-party tools and CI platforms.
Record-and-Playback: Simplifies test creation and execution.
Data-Driven Testing: Enhances testing processes by using varied data inputs.
Self-Healing: Offers resilience in automated tests upon changes.
Cross-Browser Compatibility: Supports testing across different browsers effectively.

What benefits do users highlight in reviews?

Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes and reduces manual effort.
Consistency: Promotes uniform testing practices through modular approaches.
Diverse Tech Stack Support: Accommodates a wide range of programming languages.
CI/CD Pipeline Compatibility: Enhances integration and testing in CI/CD workflows.

SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. SmartBear TestComplete

August 2026

Free Report: Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. SmartBear TestComplete and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Application Testing Suite vs. SmartBear TestComplete report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.