OpenText Functional Testing and Oracle Application Testing Suite are both solutions for automated testing in the software industry. Users generally favor OpenText for its extensive compatibility and flexibility across various platforms, providing a strong edge in diverse testing environments. However, Oracle Application Testing Suite is highly integrated with Oracle environments, offering advantages in Oracle-specific applications.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing is known for its cross-browser and operating system compatibility, supporting a wide range of technologies including GUI, API, and mobile testing. It provides a versatile solution for diverse testing needs. Oracle Application Testing Suite offers strong integration with Oracle applications, featuring robust test management and load testing capabilities well-suited for Oracle environments.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing users point to the need for better object identification and improved performance, specifically regarding memory usage and stability. Oracle Application Testing Suite could benefit from enhanced browser support and easier test setup and deployment, particularly for non-Oracle environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing supports primarily on-premises deployment, catering to specific infrastructure needs, while Oracle Application Testing Suite offers both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options. OpenText's customer service is generally seen as satisfactory, though sometimes slow on complex issues, whereas Oracle's support is prompt but can struggle with complexity.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is considered more expensive, but its extensive feature set and wide environment support offer a high ROI through reduced testing time and increased efficiency. Oracle Application Testing Suite is viewed as cost-effective for existing Oracle customers due to competitive pricing and integration benefits, promising substantial ROI particularly for those integrated with Oracle systems.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| Oracle Application Testing Suite | 1.3% |
| Other | 89.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
