OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Oracle is ranked #14. OpenText holds a 7.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to Oracle’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Read 86 OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) reviews

5,878 Views
4,467 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

3,242 Views
875 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) and Oracle Application Testing Suite are leading solutions in performance testing. LoadRunner Enterprise has the upper hand in terms of features and scalability, while Oracle Application Testing Suite stands out for its integration with Oracle applications.

Features: LoadRunner Enterprise's centralized testing platform enables efficient script management and execution over diverse protocols, offering analytics and scalable testing tools. Oracle Application Testing Suite excels in Oracle integration, providing automation and functional testing benefits, particularly for Oracle-dependent businesses.

Room for Improvement: LoadRunner Enterprise should enhance its cloud solutions and improve auxiliary tool integration, along with simplifying setup processes. Oracle Application Testing Suite would benefit from broader automation support for non-Oracle applications and better cloud/mobile integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LoadRunner Enterprise offers versatile deployment, including on-premises and cloud options, but faces mixed reviews on support responsiveness. Oracle Application Testing Suite, mainly on-premises, garners positive feedback for customer service within Oracle environments.

Pricing and ROI: LoadRunner Enterprise is priced high, with users noting a significant ROI when broad protocol testing is required. Oracle Application Testing Suite is more cost-effective for Oracle-heavy environments, providing a balanced toolkit at competitive pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Enterprise Perform...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is 7.1%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 2.6%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)	7.1%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	2.6%
Other	90.3%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vikram Katta

A VP at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Performance testing has supported web app peak analysis but needs better setup and smarter scripting

Regarding points for improvement for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise), I see that features are not being fully developed yet. If OpenText could think about bringing AI features into the tool, it could save maximum time in scripting or make scripting effortless, particularly in correlation, which is where the complexity involved in script development exists. If any AI features could replace or eliminate more manual work on the correlation part, that is where we could see a game-changing improvement for the tool. OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) can be positioned very well in the market. However, I see that the basic correlations are only being handled by the autocorrelation engine in the LoadRunner tool, and I would expect a few improvements to handle even complex correlation problems so that the tool can be appropriately positioned compared to their peers.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The host performance testing of any application using a host/controller is the most valuable feature."

"For us, the features we value and use the most are web and HTTP support."

"It is used to empower our organisation in assisting customers, addressing their concerns, finding solutions, and providing value, thus making it possible to put customer success first, and in the process, focus on the business."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."

"We have Performance Center as a platform to share with others that don't do performance testing full-time, so that they in an agile fashion, on demand can go ahead and get real issue-finding testing done; then to go ahead and have that pulled into trending reports so that even subtle differences or trends over time are found and not just game-changing defects."

"The tool is very easy to set up and get running."

"HP has very masterfully re-engineered this tool and integrated it with Application Lifecycle Management to create one of the most seamless project management suites I've used in years."

"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pros

"This tool did a much better job recording the http requests during web load testing than other open source tools."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"OATS provides the functionality to institute a corporate-wide standardized method and approach for all types of application testing."

"Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"For a few years, OATS was the only tool that allowed us to load test our Computer Telephone Integration (CTI) with Siebel."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"The price of this solution could be less expensive. However, this category of solutions is expensive."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"The level of support from HP is average."

"The debugging feature needs to include graphs."

"For such an experienced team as mine, who have been with the product for over ten years, sometimes working with technical support is not that easy."

"Sometimes the Book Time Slot option hangs if I cancel any test or time slot."

"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."

"Deletion of collating test results by admin access only."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) cons

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"Improvements can be made in a number of protocol support areas, including enhanced Citrix support."

"Transaction handling was very simple and I’d say quite primitive."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"Room for improvement would be for the reporting features. If they could improve the dashboards, that would be helpful."

"There are certain bugs which were present but was cleared in subsequent releases of application, but still there is room for improvement in the Functionality testing tool when automating form-based applications."

"The test installation pretty much destroyed my computer’s laptop performance."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an ROI. What LoadRunner does, is it prevents failures when there are many, many concurrent users in the systems of a company."

"The prices would differ depending on the number of licenses you need. I wouldn't maybe compare it to any other tools. I rate the price as seven out of ten."

"The solution should decrease its price."

"I give the cost a one out of ten."

"We got an 80 percent discount for the product. It was cost-effective, but licenses tend to get expensive."

"The price of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise could improve, it is expensive."

"We are content with the pricing and find it to be reasonable in terms of value for money."

"For Performance Center, you have to add additional load generators, and then you can do more. I think it is a matter of the price, in terms of how many machines you can buy."

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) pricing and cost advice

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	75

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten. The product carries maximum expense points.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise?

My use case for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is related to enterprise twenty six, which we are going to upgrade now. We focus on web applications.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 9% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 2% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)

September 2026

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) report

Download OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Performance Center, HPE Performance Center

OATS

Overview

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is renowned for its comprehensive performance testing capabilities, supporting a broad range of protocols with a user-friendly interface, making it ideal for global test execution and project management efficiency.

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers a robust platform designed to streamline performance testing for organizations across various industries. Its ability to manage scripts easily, support wide protocols, and maintain a scalable and centralized platform proves valuable for conducting global tests. The tool excels in generating virtual users with customizable environments and offers extensive analytics and reporting features. Despite some users seeking better integration with third-party tools and cloud support, as well as enhanced AI and DevOps integration, LoadRunner Enterprise remains a sought-after solution for performance testing. Its interface and tech support improvements, along with browser compatibility and cost concerns, are acknowledged areas for growth.

What are the essential features?

Ease of Scripting: Simplifies the creation of test scripts.
Protocol Support: Handles a wide range of protocols for diverse testing needs.
Scalability: Efficiently scales up to meet the demands of global testing teams.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates ease of use across the organization.
Robust Analytics: Provides detailed insights for performance analysis.
Test Scheduling: Offers flexible options for executing tests.
Integration: Seamlessly works with other enterprise tools to enhance functionality.
Virtual Users: Efficiently generates and manages virtual user environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Resource Optimization: Allows multiple users to conduct tests globally, optimizing resources.
Improved Management: Enhances project management through centralized testing platforms.
Predictive Insights: Simulates load responses and detects bottlenecks.
Scalability Assurance: Ensures applications handle thousands of users efficiently.

In banking, healthcare, and retail, organizations employ LoadRunner Enterprise to ensure their applications remain stable and performant during high user loads. The tool is critical for testing web services, APIs, and in-house applications, providing insights that help predict performance outcomes during key phases such as go-live, platform upgrades, and data center migrations. By confirming scalability, it ensures seamless application operation under increased user demand.

OpenText

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Hexaware, British Sky Broadcasting, JetBlue

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.