No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo

Top 10 SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Alternatives

Vendor: SolarWinds
2.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, NinjaOne, and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

SolarWinds Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with SolarWinds, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix, with its open-source platform, is ideal for organizations seeking customizable and scalable solutions. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers extensive integration and advanced management tools. A tech buyer might choose Zabbix for cost efficiency, while SolarWinds appeals with feature-rich investment.
Download SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a low setup cost, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager typically incurs higher initial expenses. SolarWinds could provide more advanced features justifying the cost, whereas Zabbix presents itself as a cost-effective solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a low setup cost, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager typically incurs higher initial expenses. SolarWinds could provide more advanced features justifying the cost, whereas Zabbix presents itself as a cost-effective solution.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
NinjaOne excels in affordability and ease of use with intuitive dashboards, automatic alerts, and simplified patch management. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers advanced automation and robust security, appealing to organizations with complex network needs despite higher cost and setup requirements.
Download NinjaOne vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
NinjaOne offers a lower setup cost compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for users seeking budget-friendly network management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NinjaOne offers a lower setup cost compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for users seeking budget-friendly network management solutions.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is valued for its scalable open-source automation and straightforward deployment. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager provides comprehensive network management features with automated monitoring and analysis, catering to complex network needs despite higher initial investment.
Download Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform often involves lower setup costs, making it more accessible for organizations with budget constraints, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager may entail higher initial investments, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform often involves lower setup costs, making it more accessible for organizations with budget constraints, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager may entail higher initial investments, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and scalability.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold offers cost-effective network monitoring with straightforward deployment and reliable support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager provides comprehensive automation and robust features, justifying its higher cost for long-term benefits and advanced capabilities.
Download SolarWinds Network Automation Manager vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold typically involves lower upfront setup costs, appealing for those seeking budget-friendly solutions, whereas SolarWinds Network Automation Manager requires higher initial investment, which might be justified by its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold typically involves lower upfront setup costs, appealing for those seeking budget-friendly solutions, whereas SolarWinds Network Automation Manager requires higher initial investment, which might be justified by its advanced features.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager excels in automation and pricing, appealing to those seeking streamlined performance and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Auvik Network Management offers superior integrations and visibility, attracting buyers who prioritize network insight and easy cloud-based deployment despite higher initial costs.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Auvik Network Management, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Auvik Network Management, highlighting a significant difference in initial expenses.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
Cisco DNA Center offers extensive network analytics and seamless policy enforcement suited for large-scale environments. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager excels in automation with efficient configuration management. Cisco appeals to those seeking depth and support, while SolarWinds attracts budget-conscious buyers with quick setup.
Download Cisco DNA Center vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
Cisco DNA Center may entail higher initial costs due to its powerful integrative capabilities, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is often noted for a more straightforward and cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco DNA Center may entail higher initial costs due to its powerful integrative capabilities, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is often noted for a more straightforward and cost-effective setup.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM excels with integrated infrastructure monitoring and comprehensive dashboards. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager focuses on network automation and configuration management. While SCOM is cost-effective with Microsoft integration, SolarWinds offers extensive features, promising long-term value despite higher upfront costs.
Download SCOM vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
SCOM has a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager often incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its broader feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM has a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager often incurs higher initial expenses, reflecting its broader feature set.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
Kentik excels with ease of use and efficient data processing, offering powerful real-time traffic analysis. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager provides comprehensive features such as extensive automation and network compliance management, appealing to enterprises needing sophisticated automation and greater network visibility.
Download Kentik vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
Kentik has a lower setup cost compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, highlighting a cost-effective solution for network monitoring.
View comparison
Pricing
Kentik has a lower setup cost compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, highlighting a cost-effective solution for network monitoring.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
ManageEngine OpManager
4.0 out of 5
ManageEngine OpManager draws attention for affordability and support, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers advanced features for those seeking extensive capabilities. ManageEngine's integration ease attracts diverse IT environments, while SolarWinds provides robust automation and customization for complex networks.
Download ManageEngine OpManager vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
ManageEngine OpManager generally features lower setup costs compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, which may incur higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine OpManager generally features lower setup costs compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, which may incur higher initial expenses.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance prioritizes network security and diagnostics, ideal for environments needing robust fault isolation. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager focuses on automation, attracting those wanting extensive configuration management and efficiency, despite its higher costs and more complex deployment process.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance has lower setup costs compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, which tends to require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance has lower setup costs compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, which tends to require a higher initial investment.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
OpenNMS is used for network monitoring, offering valuable features like real-time alarms and extensive data collection. Users appreciate its flexibility and scalability but suggest improvements in simplifying configuration processes and enhancing documentation. Its customization capabilities cater to various network environments, providing essential monitoring solutions.
View comparison
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
NetBrain
3.6 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
NetBrain
3.6 out of 5
NetBrain excels in visual data delivery with dynamic mapping and automated troubleshooting, appealing to those prioritizing network performance visualization. In comparison, SolarWinds, with its extensive automation and performance monitoring, attracts tech buyers seeking comprehensive functionality and robust network operations support.
Download NetBrain vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
NetBrain has a straightforward setup cost, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers a more intricate pricing structure, potentially affecting the initial investment and scalability for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
NetBrain has a straightforward setup cost, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers a more intricate pricing structure, potentially affecting the initial investment and scalability for businesses.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Entuity
4.2 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Entuity
4.2 out of 5
Entuity provides comprehensive network analytics and favorable pricing, appealing to cost-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers superior automation and scalability, appealing to those seeking advanced features despite higher costs. Both solutions present unique benefits for enterprise network management.
Download Entuity vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
Entuity offers lower setup costs with simple deployment compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, which has higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Entuity offers lower setup costs with simple deployment compared to SolarWinds Network Automation Manager, which has higher upfront expenses.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM)
4.0 out of 5
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller suits large-scale network automation with cost-effective pricing, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager integrates diverse IT environments with extensive features. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers easy deployment, whereas Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller provides better customer support for complex setups.
Download Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller involves higher initial setup costs, whereas SolarWinds Network Automation Manager presents a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a clear distinction in initial financial investment required for each.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller involves higher initial setup costs, whereas SolarWinds Network Automation Manager presents a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a clear distinction in initial financial investment required for each.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Nuage Networks
4.4 out of 5
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
Nuage Networks
4.4 out of 5
Nuage Networks excels in network virtualization and multi-cloud connectivity, ideal for efficient resource management. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers extensive monitoring and IT integration, suitable for those prioritizing scalable automation and reducing network downtime. Pricing varies with upfront costs versus long-term benefits.
Download Nuage Networks vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
Nuage Networks offers competitive setup costs, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is known for a higher initial price. Users seeking affordability might prefer Nuage Networks, whereas those focusing on comprehensive features could opt for SolarWinds.
View comparison
Pricing
Nuage Networks offers competitive setup costs, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is known for a higher initial price. Users seeking affordability might prefer Nuage Networks, whereas those focusing on comprehensive features could opt for SolarWinds.
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Logo
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks
3.8 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks is valued for its cost-effectiveness and outstanding support, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, SolarWinds Network Automation Manager attracts those seeking extensive features and long-term ROI, despite a higher initial investment.
Download BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks requires a higher setup cost, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks requires a higher setup cost, while SolarWinds Network Automation Manager offers a more budget-friendly option.

Related categories

Network Automation
Network Monitoring Software
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability