Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.
Get the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless and more!
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is the #3 ranked solution in top Wireless LAN solutions. PeerSpot users give Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most commonly compared to Aruba Wireless: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Wireless. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 51% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
January 2026
Get the report
Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Featured Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

Read more reviews

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN mindshare

As of January 2026, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN in the Wireless LAN category stands at 10.5%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN10.5%
Aruba Wireless13.9%
Ruckus Wireless12.8%
Other62.8%
Wireless LAN

PeerResearch reports based on Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWireless LANJan 21, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 21, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba WirelessJan 21, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Ruckus WirelessJan 21, 2026Download
ComparisonCisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco WirelessJan 21, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Aruba Wireless4.213.9%87%150 interviewsAdd to research
Ruckus Wireless4.312.8%95%105 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Oct 26, 2025

Valuable Features

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's most valuable features include centralized cloud management, ease of deployment, and a user-friendly dashboard for monitoring and configuring networks remotely. Users appreciate its security, robust performance, and seamless connectivity. It efficiently handles guest access, application visibility, traffic shaping, and network policies. The intuitive interface simplifies management, even for smaller IT teams, and ensures reliable, flexible network operations while offering excellent reporting and analytics capabilities.
  • "With the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN system, it can be shipped as new to any location, connected to the network, and the rest will come up automatically from the cloud interface."
  • "The best features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN include the excellent reporting; the dashboard reporting aids us a lot in troubleshooting issues, and the platform is very robust."
  • "I would recommend Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN simply because of the ease of deployment and its reliability."

Room for Improvement

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN needs enhancement in technical support and logging capabilities. Users seek more advanced features, improved pricing, and better integration with other Cisco products. There are calls for better security, licensing, and on-premises management options. Users desire WiFi 6 support, cloud compliance, and improved performance in complex environments. Pricing, ease of installation, and customization need attention. The solution's scalability and user interface also require development, while the need for role-based access and third-party integration is emphasized.
  • "The stability could be better. We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network."
  • "The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks."
  • "The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks."

ROI

Many users observed good ROI from Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, noting cost savings in resources and transport. The system's features, analytics, and user insights were praised, though initially high costs were acknowledged. It is regarded as more suitable for small businesses due to its ease of installation and management. For some, its advanced technology and usage reporting offset the expense. Some expected ROI within three to five years.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers often find Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing competitive due to its high-quality features and reliable performance. However, costs are perceived as high compared to alternatives like Aruba and Ruckus. Pricing is tied to annual licensing, which some users find challenging due to renewal dependencies. While hardware might be initially affordable, the subscription model increases costs over time. Negotiating deals can mitigate some expenses, though customers note that additional fees can accumulate, affecting overall budget considerations.
  • "The solution's pricing is a little higher."
  • "It could be more affordable than other solutions."
  • "The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."

Popular Use Cases

Users implement Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN primarily for Wi-Fi access in varied environments such as educational institutions, businesses, and hospitals. It facilitates connectivity for employees, guests, and IoT devices across multiple locations. Organizations benefit from its cloud management, ease of deployment, and robust security. They utilize it for network monitoring, guest services, and enterprise wireless needs, often integrating with existing infrastructure to streamline digital operations and enhance user experience.

Service and Support

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN customer service and technical support are generally well-received by users. Many commend the quick and knowledgeable responses, with some experiencing prompt and effective issue resolution. However, some users report occasional delays and the need for persistence in troubleshooting. The support model through the dashboard is praised, although a few users feel there’s room for improvement, especially regarding response time and the knowledge of first-level support staff.

Deployment

Many users find Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's initial setup easy and user-friendly, often describing it as straightforward and intuitive. It's often characterized as a plug-and-play process, with quick deployment times ranging from a few minutes to a few days, depending on the project size. Some mention that those without experience might need initial guidance, while others note some setups required more time and planning, especially in complex environments.

Scalability

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN scales well for diverse organizations, supporting numerous users and devices. Many appreciate its cloud-based nature, enabling easy expansion and addition of access points. While some highlight cost and licensing challenges, most agree it is suitable for medium to large enterprises. Users report its adaptability for various demands, with some citing it as highly scalable, although some note limitations in very large deployments. Generally considered a reliable choice for scalability.

Stability

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is generally considered stable, with most users experiencing few issues. Many report it efficiently handles large numbers of connections and requires minimal maintenance. A few mention concerns with older devices causing potential problems. Occasional firmware updates may require careful scheduling to prevent disruptions. Users rate the stability highly, with instances of instability often tied to external factors like internet connectivity. Some improvement suggestions include better coverage and more straightforward update processes.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business64
Midsize Enterprise22
Large Enterprise22
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business571
Midsize Enterprise308
Large Enterprise905
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Retailer
6%
Government
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
University
4%
Construction Company
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%

Compare Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN was previously known as MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Related questions

  • 196
Can Cisco Meraki and Cisco Wireless work in the same environment?
  • 225
What is the biggest difference between Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless?
  • 377
What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
  • 13
How does Cisco Meraki solution perform for Voice and SD-WAN?
  • 17
How different are the pricing and costs of Aruba Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
  • 26
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
  • 162
What are the differences between Cisco Meraki MX67 and FortiGate 60?
  • 22
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
  • 43
Which is better - Ubiquiti Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
  • 22
Which product would you choose and why: Mist AI and Cloud or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Wireless LAN

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Fortinet FortiAP vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Omada Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Omada Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Mist AI and Cloud vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Mist AI and Cloud vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Fortinet FortiWLM vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Fortinet FortiWLM vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Aruba Instant vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Instant vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
D-Link Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
D-Link Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
ExtremeWireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
ExtremeWireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Aruba Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Logo
Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
See all alternatives
 
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Independent Information Technology and Services Professional at a non-profit with 1-10 employees5.0I’ve used Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for eight years and find it stable, secure, and easy to deploy, with excellent remote management and reporting features, competitive pricing, and responsive support—making it ideal for our MSP environment.
Manager, Information Technology at a performing arts with 11-50 employees4.5In our nonprofit organization, we upgraded from outdated Cisco access points to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, appreciating the centralized control and ability to manage all access points from one dashboard. Recent improvements include new wireless protocols and stronger antennas, enhancing performance.
Solution Architect at airtel4.5I use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for office infrastructure and IoT, finding it intuitive and offering excellent control and visibility. However, it's best for small to medium businesses, as it struggles with scalability for larger enterprises.
Sr. Officer Network Managed Service Product Management at PT. Indosat Tbk4.0I primarily use Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for enterprise and guest Wi-Fi, especially in the retail sector. Its cloud-based management offers streamlined control of wireless devices and security clients, though improving uplink limitations could enhance competitiveness and user experience.
Chief Technologies Officer at ASTORG PARTNERS4.0I've used Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN for five years and find its cloud-managed, plug-and-play setup very convenient. It's stable, scalable, easy to configure, and integrates well across locations, though occasional update issues arise.
Strategie, Innovazione e Customer Experience – Analytics & Customer Experience (CEX) Manager at Telecom Italia4.0I find Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN valuable for its centralized security management, simplifying network security. However, the management tools require improvement. There are no specific deployment details or consideration of other solutions mentioned in the review.
Consultant at Markit Spain3.5In reviewing Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, I find that while it excels in cloud solutions and open APIs, it needs improvements in multi-tenant speed and graphics. Although Cisco surpasses Aruba in bandwidth efficiency, Ruckus leads in radio signaling.
It manager at MMA24.0Our primary use for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is providing secure Internet access for guests and remote settings with features like a hospitality landing page for guest authentication. However, expanding the coverage area would enhance connectivity and improve overall performance.