Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Huawei Wireless comparison

Cisco and Huawei are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0, while Huawei is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5. Cisco holds a 9.3% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Huawei’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Huawei users who would recommend it.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Read 122 Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN reviews

11,464 Views
10,203 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Huawei Wireless

Read 36 Huawei Wireless reviews

4,998 Views
4,898 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Huawei Wireless

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Huawei Wireless compete in the wireless LAN market. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive cloud management capabilities and integration with other Meraki products, though Huawei Wireless offers competitive pricing.

Features: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers cloud management, robust reporting, and easy integration with other Meraki products. It allows extensive visibility and ease of deployment with centralized control through its dashboard. Huawei Wireless provides affordable pricing, good performance with multiple SSID support, and seamless roaming.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could improve its customization capabilities and address high costs, licensing issues, and limitations in scalability. Huawei Wireless needs to enhance its technical support, reduce demo setup complexity, and address stability concerns, especially with power injectors.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN supports versatile deployment in both cloud and on-premises environments and receives generally positive feedback on technical support. Huawei Wireless is mainly deployed on-premises, known for its competitive pricing but faces challenges with customer support and demo software accessibility.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on the expensive side with cumbersome licensing fees if not well-managed; it's suitable for enterprises seeking cost savings in hiring and operational efficiency. Huawei Wireless is more cost-effective, offering perpetual licensing options and aggressive pricing, although it might not fit smaller SMB environments well.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,915 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

4.4

Number of Reviews

122

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Huawei Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 9.3%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huawei Wireless is 4.8%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN	9.3%
Huawei Wireless	4.8%
Other	85.9%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

DolfKrikke

Senior Network Architect at Previder

Centralized management has simplified remote branch control and improved network visibility

Cisco Meraki Wireless is very powerful and very easy to manage. The solution is also integrating Cisco Catalyst Wireless products into their portfolio, and they are managing the Catalyst switches as well. The seamless roaming capabilities function well. I monitor network performance with Meraki's real-time analytics. The most useful metrics to my team are the internet performance metrics, as there is a lot of information in the dashboard that I can access. All auditing and event logs are centralized in the dashboard. When I need to apply to compliance requirements or other regulatory needs, I can have my auditing in one place, which is an advantage. I use Cisco Meraki Wireless's Layer 7 application traffic shaping with the MX and the Meraki MX Firewalls.

Read full review

Shahnawaz Nusrat

Head Of Technical Operations at ITE

Effective and extensive campus Wi-Fi with room for better frequency management

We have deployed Huawei CCTV solutions at multiple universities in Pakistan. This includes Huawei Wireless for Smart Campus projects, where we provide blanket Wi-Fi coverage and Safe Campus projects, where we deploy security cameras and multiple devices to monitor the campus Huawei Wireless has…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Configuring network policies remotely for Cisco Meraki Wireless is very useful for an organization that has many branches, as I can manage it centrally from the Meraki dashboard without having to drive to a location, even if it is 100 or more kilometers away."

"Their support is perfect. They're there 24/7, 365 days a year. Whether you email or phone in, there is always someone there to help you."

"The most valuable feature is the technology of the security that is offered."

"The primary value lies in the ease of configuration; these products seamlessly integrate, and work well together."

"Cisco provides 24/7 support"

"The flexibility, since it's a cloud service, is the most valuable feature of this solution, as well as the administration, management of the whole platform, development, and deployment options in the cloud."

"I like the status page Cisco added that shows you the health of the wireless connection."

"If you have some money, it is a good thing to buy."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pros

"The solution is easily managed compared to other wireless solutions."

"Huawei Wireless's most valuable feature is smart antenna, a combination of informative capabilities and advanced technology."

"Installation is easy."

"You can add a lot of features, such as cloud, integration with IoT, etc. They have a lot of options available but the top feature is the performance."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"It is based on 802.11ax, which is a new technology, and there are several valuable things, such as its speed and mobility, options for self-organizing networking so that it can perform operations and maintain itself, and its three interfaces are very good and user friendly."

"The most valuable thing about Huawei Wireless is that it is one of the cheapest WiFi 6 systems. Its price is very nice. The other WiFi systems cost about 15% more."

"It has all of the features that we need."

More Huawei Wireless pros

Cons

"I would like to see integration with sensors."

"The only concern is when the license has expired and it will no longer function, the entire network goes down, without any notification, or warning."

"It would be good to integrate with ISE in the future."

"The logging sometimes doesn't give us the granularity needed."

"Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN could improve by having more granularity in terms of the data displayed. However, I understand that with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, you need to have a compromise point to what are the functions that you're going to provide to the users versus ease of use. More granularity in terms of the data and the things that you can do to the devices would be helpful. For example, when we wanted to make a change, restriction, or segregation within Palo Alto, we can go to the level of detail that we want. The amount of detail provided is amazing, it is very granular. However, it comes with much more difficulty, it requires a technical understanding of the environment compared to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN."

"Because it's so easy for the common person to use, it has become less desirable for people who know the technology."

"It would be better if they enable full integration with Cisco's cloud-based network in the next release."

"The error logs need to be much more comprehensive."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN cons

"The demo program is an area for improvement in Huawei Wireless as it's hard to use."

"The solution's integration with some AAA servers like Aruba ClearPass is difficult and could be improved."

"The security of the solution could be better in the future."

"Technical support is not ideal. They sometimes cannot connect to the wireless access point or their connection drops."

"This solution has issues with bugs and instability."

"The solution could be easier to use."

"They should actually first test the equipment thoroughly and then launch it."

"This solution has issues with bugs and instability."

More Huawei Wireless cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You have to renew your contract every year, or for three or for five years. If you do not pay right away they will suspend your subscription."

"Meraki is a very good solution, but the price is quite high for small markets."

"Its price is okay for an enterprise. Its licensing is the most painful. If you hear anything bad about Cisco, it's about that. We're supposed to be one of the resellers but had to come back down to become a user. It's really bizarre."

"The pricing is based on a subscription and is a bit high at the moment."

"My client has made comments on the price, indicating it is expensive, however you do receive a lot for the money that you did spend on the solution. The price of the annual renewal of the licensing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is a little high. We wish the price would drop."

"The price is on the high side when compared to Aruba."

"Since it's been acquired by Cisco, it's an even higher cost."

"This solution is slightly more expensive than others, such as Ruckus Wi-Fi."

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"Right now, my company made a one-time purchase of Huawei Wireless. It depends, but in most of the projects where customers buy hardware with some software, it's a one-time purchase. Customers pay a yearly fee for other projects for support and additional software features, such as email protection firmware updates for cybersecurity. You'll also receive information about the latest attacks and get more protection if you pay an additional fee apart from the standard license fee. You'll also get an additional warranty for Huawei Wireless, a yearly contract."

"Its price is reasonable."

"It is not monthly. It is a kind of perpetual licensing. We pay once depending on the kind of services we need to deliver. There are no licensing fees."

"Extras come with a surcharge."

"Huawei licenses can be for either a one-year up to a five-year period and also apply for the tiers."

"The platform is less costly than one of its competitors. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Huawei Wireless is a cheaper solution when you compare it to the cost of other similar solutions. It has one of the most competitive prices out there."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a seven out of ten."

More Huawei Wireless pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	70
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	31

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?

Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...

See all answers

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...

See all answers

Which wireless solution would you choose - Huawei or D-Link?

Huawei wireless is a strong and solid product that has a lot of features - and for all that it offers, it happens to be very cost effective. As a wireless solution, it is simple and its user interf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Huawei Wireless?

For SMB customers with limited wireless users, Huawei Wireless may not be suitable due to the lack of multiple access points and the need for a centralized SSID. However, for large-capacity custome...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Huawei Wireless?

The manageability of radio frequencies to avoid overlapping needs improvement. Additionally, the reporting part requires enhancement as some customers need detailed reports of each Wi-Fi point, whi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 34% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 10% of the time

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 5% of the time

Aruba Access Points vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN Competitors

Aruba Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 12% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 11% of the time

D-Link Wireless vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 9% of the time

Omada Access Points vs Huawei Wireless

Compared 5% of the time

More Huawei Wireless Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN

May 2026

Download Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Huawei Wireless

May 2026

Download Huawei Wireless product report

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN

Huawei WLAN

Overview

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN provides cloud-based management for remote configuration and network monitoring. It simplifies deployment and offers centralized control alongside high visibility.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ideal for managing complex networks and infrastructures without on-site controllers. It features an intuitive dashboard for seamless device integration and robust security, ensuring stable connectivity. Users can easily make network adjustments, track real-time analytics, and set multiple access IDs. While effective, areas needing enhancement include detailed logging, improved security features, more competitive licensing, and better integration with other solutions. Advanced user and support features could also see upgrades, and its dashboard functionality may benefit from improvements. Feedback indicates concerns about coverage, device management, and technical support. Customization, scalability, and compatibility limitations are noted compared to some competing solutions.

What are Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN's features?

Cloud-Based Management: Enables remote network configuration and monitoring.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Offers a seamless interface for managing network activities.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into network performance.
Robust Security: Ensures protection against unauthorized access.
Scalability: Supports large infrastructures without on-site controllers.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without expert requirements.
Centralized Control: Streamlines network management across locations.
High Visibility: Enhances understanding of network activities.
Reliable Connectivity: Ensures constant and stable network access.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with simplified management and support.

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is widely used across sectors like education, healthcare, retail, and corporate environments to manage client and guest access, secure networks, and integrate IoT devices. Schools, hospitals, offices, and data centers deploy it for its ease of deployment and centralized management. Resellers and integrators utilize it for networking and security solutions to ensure reliable connectivity in diverse environments.

Cisco

Huawei Wireless offers high-speed performance and easy management, providing seamless roaming and connectivity with advanced security and strong coverage. It's recognized for impressive integration with existing systems and valued in various sectors, including enterprise and education.

Huawei Wireless stands out with WiFi 6 and 7 compatibility, smart antennas, customizable options, and stability, ensuring excellent range and performance. Its user-friendly setup and management, coupled with competitive pricing and robust cloud connectivity, make it a preferred choice. Although improvements in visibility, control, and third-party integration are needed, it provides strong value through its advanced features and coverage.

What are the notable features of Huawei Wireless?

WiFi 6 and 7 Compatibility: Ensures high-speed and reliable connectivity.
Smart Antennas: Optimizes signal strength and coverage.
Customizable Options: Offers flexible deployment tailored to specific needs.
Strong Coverage: Delivers consistent connectivity across large areas.

What benefits should users expect from Huawei Wireless?

Easy Integration: Streamlines setup with existing systems.
Advanced Security: Protects data and user privacy with rigorous protocols.
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands with ease.
Value for Money: Offers competitive pricing with extensive features.

Huawei Wireless serves enterprise, educational, and personal environments effectively, supporting campus networks, home WiFi, and mobile users. It's utilized for campus-wide access, enterprise-level deployment, and smart campus projects. Service providers adopt it for client solutions, while organizations leverage it for employee internet connections, supporting BYOD policies and accessing applications like Office 365.

Huawei

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Anhui Agricultural University (AAU), China Everbright Bank

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless

April 2026

Free Report: Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,915 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Huawei Wireless report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.