"Provided reliability and a good price."
"The most valuable features are the multiple types of user groupings and access management."
"From a security perspective, this product has several advantages."
"The visibility of the site is most useful."
"The solution is trustworthy. I find it easy and secure."
"Its ease of use and flexibility are most valuable. It is cloud-based software."
"The big draw is the ease of installation. It's easy to manage, and it's easy to implement."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"I'm very satisfied with Cisco's technical support."
"The support is very good. Technical support is very helpful."
"The installation process is very easy."
"Cisco Wireless is easy to use."
"Cisco Wireless is scalable."
"We are using Cisco access point 2802, and they are very reliable."
"Support is fantastic. They are helpful and responsive."
"The integration is great."
"We're are not fully utilizing the features of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN to know a more in-depth analysis of what areas need to be improved. However, the security could improve. It would be a benefit to be able to lock out particular clients that are trying to connect from outside the building."
"If you lose connectivity with the controller, your Wi-Fi network is immediately impacted."
"If there are advanced features that you can have enabled, they should allow users access to that in an easier manner."
"It is expensive. Juniper seems to have a lot more to offer for future expansion. Juniper has some features that are not there in this solution."
"Meraki is still very much a small office type of solution. It is not a fit for large enterprise networks, as it doesn't have tunneling functionalities."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"Its price should be reduced."
"When we are using SSID roaming, it is not flexible in terms of which AP it connects to."
"An expensive solution that small companies cannot afford."
"The price should be reduced. It should be cheaper."
"Sometimes, in some rooms the signal could be a bit better, a little stronger."
"It's end-of-life, it will be end-of-support in the next two years. The APs are also end-of-life."
"Controllers could be improved."
"They are a pretty expensive option."
"It's very scalable, but when you shift gears sometimes, you have to do more work than people anticipate."
"It requires a few tweaks in order to stabilize it. Its portal is complex. Cisco solutions are complex in general."
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 55 reviews while Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 68 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Knowledgeable and helpful support, and it scales and load-balances to fit our needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Robust with a good level of performance and very helpful technical support". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Mist Access Points and Aruba Instant, whereas Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Fortinet FortiWLM and Mist Access Points. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Cisco Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.