We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Mist AI and Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The simplicity is great."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"Great architecturally based dashboard and the solution is accessible from anywhere."
"The solution has worked very well in our campus environment."
"The visibility of the site is most useful."
"The captive portal feature is my favorite. It allows us to keep track of how many people are entering our client's businesses."
"From a security perspective, this product has several advantages."
"The product has been very stable over the years."
"The emailing of statuses is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is that the solution is friendly to manage."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"Concern when there are a number of concurrent users."
"Meraki leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to the technical capabilities in terms of throughput, spectrum, management, higher-level functions, etc"
"It would be good to integrate with ISE in the future."
"There's nothing that special about it."
"Some of their first level support staff does not seem to be well-versed in the solution, so support for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN needs improvement."
"They're great. If there's anything that they need to change, it is just simplifying the site to which you go to make changes on the admin side."
"We have used technical support for some issues but not many times."
"It would be nice to have licensing that stays in place while the system is being renovated or changed."
"The inter-functionality with other vendors was a negative for us."
"There could be more integration."
More Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 54 reviews while Mist AI and Cloud is ranked 19th in Wireless LAN with 2 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.0, while Mist AI and Cloud is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Highly reliable, effective site blocking, and beneficial reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist AI and Cloud writes "With Wi-Fi 6, we're able to have better coverage and better performance". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM, whereas Mist AI and Cloud is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Juniper WLC Series and Huawei Wireless. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist AI and Cloud report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
