We performed a comparison between Aruba Access Points and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The simplicity is great."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"It offers remarkable client-handling capacity."
"I find AI Insights valuable."
"After we installed the Aruba switches, the work became faster because the network speed improved."
"Aruba's virtual controller is the most important feature."
"The Adaptive Radio Management feature is quite good."
"Aruba Access Points is an easy-to-use solution."
"The product is quite accessible and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"We're able to automate as well as manually control as necessary."
"It is cloud-based. You can manage it remotely from anywhere in the world, and you don't have to be on-site, which is a very big advantage."
"The product has been very stable over the years."
"This product offers cloud-based configuration, so you can set it up from anywhere."
"I have found the scalability to be very good."
"I like the status page Cisco added that shows you the health of the wireless connection."
"The most valuable feature is cloud management."
"Meraki is a decent solution for a small company, and we use it in a pretty typical way. We need Teams and Zoom to work, and we need a high level of security because we want our business to remain confidential."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The price could be better."
"The solution's lead time is very slow and should be improved."
"The solution should be made more robust."
"The ICT dynamic is important. Every other vendor is innovating with new features and ideas. They need to compete and implement these things to stay ahead. So, I would suggest Aruba continue to gain the competitive edge."
"The delivery timeline is a major problem. There are also configuration and integration issues since not many engineers are available in the market who has expertise with the product. Some of our customers also experience network slowness."
"The integration capabilities of the product with the tools from other vendors is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The disadvantage of Aruba Access Points is experienced by me when I need it to offer me a long range of coverage."
"The product's prices are an area of concern. The product should be available at a lower price point."
"The product should improve its integration and the grouping of the features and functions."
"The annual maintenance is something that needs to be changed."
"If they could work on the Meraki firewall hardware, and add SSL decryption as well as more application control and deep packet inspection, that would be ideal."
"The signal coverage radius could be extended."
"The licensing isn't very customer-centric. They may have improved it, but previously, if you forgot to pay on a certain day, your service would be shut off."
"It is expensive. Juniper seems to have a lot more to offer for future expansion. Juniper has some features that are not there in this solution."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"There could be more functionality."
"We haven't had any issues with the solution. We like the way it works. There isn't anything I can think of that makes me worry that it might be lacking in a certain area."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Access Points is ranked 9th in Wireless LAN with 31 reviews while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews. Aruba Access Points is rated 8.6, while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Access Points writes "This is a reliable product that is easy to scale thanks to its virtual controller". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". Aruba Access Points is most compared with FortiAP, whereas Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud, Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Wireless. See our Aruba Access Points vs. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
