Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo

Top 10 Splunk Enterprise Security Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.2 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
8,509 followers
Start review

Top Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk Enterprise Security based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Wazuh, and Microsoft Sentinel. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk Enterprise Security surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled real-time threat detection with advanced analytics, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration capabilities, empowering organizations to efficiently manage security incidents and maintain proactive threat intelligence.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in managing large data environments with superior log management and data visualization. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon focuses on advanced threat detection and AI-driven analytics. Splunk offers extensive functionality; CrowdStrike provides robust endpoint protection with seamless deployment across cloud environments.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon tends to offer a more cost-effective initial setup. Splunk provides extensive features, whereas CrowdStrike focuses on streamlined efficiency and lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, while CrowdStrike Falcon tends to offer a more cost-effective initial setup. Splunk provides extensive features, whereas CrowdStrike focuses on streamlined efficiency and lower initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels with robust data aggregation and scalability, ideal for complex deployments seeking extensive features. In comparison, Wazuh offers cost-effective, basic SIEM options, attracting smaller organizations prioritizing budget-friendly solutions with essential monitoring and intrusion detection capabilities.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Wazuh Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs higher setup costs for its comprehensive analytics capabilities, while Wazuh offers a cost-effective setup with its open-source platform approach, highlighting a significant financial difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs higher setup costs for its comprehensive analytics capabilities, while Wazuh offers a cost-effective setup with its open-source platform approach, highlighting a significant financial difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management and data customization, ideal for large enterprises needing robust analysis. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel offers seamless Azure integration and AI-driven threat detection, appealing to those heavily invested in Microsoft environments, despite potential cost challenges.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more cost-effective entry point.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in analytics and threat detection, appealing to those prioritizing security insights. In comparison, Dynatrace offers seamless integration and automated features, making it attractive for efficient performance management. Splunk's customization contrasts with Dynatrace's straightforward deployment and quicker ROI.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is known to be substantial, while Dynatrace generally offers a more flexible pricing approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is known to be substantial, while Dynatrace generally offers a more flexible pricing approach.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in complex environments with extensive log management and operational intelligence. In comparison, Datadog offers comprehensive infrastructure and application performance monitoring. Splunk shines in large-scale operations, while Datadog is suitable for real-time insights with vast integrations.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves higher setup costs compared to Datadog, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves higher setup costs compared to Datadog, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels at data ingestion and analysis with robust search and compliance support. In comparison, New Relic offers strong performance monitoring and error tracking. Tech buyers might choose Splunk for data insights and security or New Relic for application performance.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves a higher setup cost compared to New Relic, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically involves a higher setup cost compared to New Relic, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in vulnerability management, threat detection, and integration. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security offers strong log management and community support. A tech buyer might choose QRadar for affordability and customization, while Splunk provides extensive analytics and flexibility across deployment environments.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
IBM Security QRadar typically has a lower setup cost, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is higher, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses for businesses considering these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar typically has a lower setup cost, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is higher, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses for businesses considering these security solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security is ideal for those needing advanced data visualization and rapid incident response through dynamic queries. In comparison, Elastic Security caters to users valuing flexibility, open-source benefits, and seamless integration with the ELK Stack for pattern identification.
Download Elastic Security vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost can be substantial, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Elastic Security offers a potentially lower setup cost, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly options.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost can be substantial, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Elastic Security offers a potentially lower setup cost, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly options.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management with rapid incident response and versatile deployment. In comparison, Elastic Observability is cost-effective with strong cloud features and text search. Buyers may choose Splunk for comprehensive support or Elastic for open-source flexibility and affordability.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs substantial setup costs, whereas Elastic Observability offers more budget-friendly initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs substantial setup costs, whereas Elastic Observability offers more budget-friendly initial expenses.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers extensive data ingestion, ideal for high-volume security analysis, necessitating skilled management. In comparison, Grafana Loki provides cost-effective, uncomplicated log aggregation, seamlessly integrating with microservices, appealing to businesses seeking an open-source solution without complex setup.
Download Grafana Loki vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a substantial setup cost, whereas Grafana Loki presents a more cost-effective initial investment. This highlights a key financial difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security requires a substantial setup cost, whereas Grafana Loki presents a more cost-effective initial investment. This highlights a key financial difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Graylog
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Graylog
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced log management and rapid incident response, suitable for compliance-focused organizations. In comparison, Graylog's open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness appeal to those needing basic visualization and integration with Elasticsearch, meeting simpler organizational needs.
Download Graylog vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically requires a higher setup cost compared to Graylog, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically requires a higher setup cost compared to Graylog, highlighting a significant price difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers powerful analytics and comprehensive data management, appealing to large-scale enterprises. In comparison, Security Onion focuses on network security monitoring, providing cost-effectiveness with open-source access, suiting smaller organizations with limited budgets and rapid deployment needs.
Download Security Onion vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a significant initial setup cost, while Security Onion offers a more cost-effective setup option. Splunk provides comprehensive features for large enterprises, whereas Security Onion prioritizes open-source affordability and ease of deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a significant initial setup cost, while Security Onion offers a more cost-effective setup option. Splunk provides comprehensive features for large enterprises, whereas Security Onion prioritizes open-source affordability and ease of deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security enhances security with visibility, platform integration, and risk-based alerts. In comparison, Palantir Foundry excels in data integration and management across frameworks. Splunk's deployment flexibility contrasts with Foundry's cloud focus, both offering high-cost, high-value solutions.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Palantir Foundry, presenting a significant price difference in the initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Palantir Foundry, presenting a significant price difference in the initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security provides vast flexibility in deployment and operational intelligence through superior log management. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM emphasizes affordability, AI-driven monitoring, and reliability, catering to medium and large businesses needing cost-effective solutions with comprehensive third-party integration.
Download LogRhythm SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to LogRhythm SIEM, which offers affordability with its setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to LogRhythm SIEM, which offers affordability with its setup options.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cortex XSIAM
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security is known for data management and real-time alerts, excelling in flexibility and integration. In comparison, Cortex XSIAM offers advanced AI for threat detection and seamless integration with Palo Alto Networks products, providing competitive pricing with comprehensive features.
Download Cortex XSIAM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a more substantial setup cost, while Cortex XSIAM is geared towards a more modest initial financial outlay. Both solutions target different budget considerations for their respective user requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a more substantial setup cost, while Cortex XSIAM is geared towards a more modest initial financial outlay. Both solutions target different budget considerations for their respective user requirements.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Rapid7 InsightIDR
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management and operational intelligence with schema-on-read technology, offering flexibility and broad data ingestion. In comparison, Rapid7 InsightIDR emphasizes user behavior analytics and automated responses, providing ease of integration and cost-effective threat detection solutions with intuitive dashboards.
Download Rapid7 InsightIDR vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security features a high setup cost, contrasting with the relatively lower setup cost of Rapid7 InsightIDR.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security features a high setup cost, contrasting with the relatively lower setup cost of Rapid7 InsightIDR.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiSIEM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in search and data analysis, appealing to those valuing operational intelligence. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSIEM integrates SOC and NOC functionalities, suiting organizations seeking comprehensive security and network operations management with cost-effective pricing and third-party integration capabilities.
Download Fortinet FortiSIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiSIEM, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making FortiSIEM a preferable choice for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiSIEM, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making FortiSIEM a preferable choice for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
AlienVault OSSIM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in search and data presentation, making it ideal for compliance and diverse data insights. In comparison, AlienVault OSSIM's open-source model is cost-effective, offering inclusive security features suitable for small to medium businesses seeking manageable integration.
Download AlienVault OSSIM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security offers a different setup cost experience compared to AlienVault OSSIM, highlighting the variance in initial investment. AlienVault OSSIM often appeals to those seeking budget-friendly options, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security targets enterprises with robust ...
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security offers a different setup cost experience compared to AlienVault OSSIM, highlighting the variance in initial investment. AlienVault OSSIM often appeals to those seeking budget-friendly options, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security targets enterprises with robust ...
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
syslog-ng
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
syslog-ng
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security provides advanced analytics and threat detection, catering to organizations needing comprehensive security event analysis. In comparison, syslog-ng offers simplicity and efficiency in log management, appealing to businesses seeking reliable, easy-to-integrate solutions with cost-effective initial setups.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. syslog-ng Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs a higher setup cost, while syslog-ng offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs a higher setup cost, while syslog-ng offers a more affordable initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data management and flexibility in security insights, ideal for complex datasets. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch excels in AWS integration, providing real-time monitoring but faces limitations outside AWS. Both cater to different tech buyer priorities efficiently.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas Amazon CloudWatch offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas Amazon CloudWatch offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data analytics and customization, appealing to those seeking comprehensive data analysis. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer attracts with cost-efficiency and seamless Fortinet integration, ideal for streamlined log management and network security insights.
Download Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is high, whereas Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is high, whereas Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust data search capabilities and log management, appealing for its scalability and integration across sources. In comparison, ScienceLogic excels in application integration and multi-tenant architecture, attracting buyers with customizable dashboards and extensive device monitoring.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost than ScienceLogic, which is a more affordable option. ScienceLogic's pricing is appealing compared to the more premium pricing of Splunk's solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost than ScienceLogic, which is a more affordable option. ScienceLogic's pricing is appealing compared to the more premium pricing of Splunk's solution.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Google Chronicle Suite
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in flexible deployments and robust support, ideal for complex customization and deep analytics. In comparison, Google Chronicle Suite offers straightforward cloud-native deployment with cost efficiency, focusing on seamless integration and scalability for tech buyers prioritizing integration and real-time threat detection.
Download Google Chronicle Suite vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs compared to the competitive setup fees associated with Google Chronicle Suite, reflecting notable pricing differences between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs compared to the competitive setup fees associated with Google Chronicle Suite, reflecting notable pricing differences between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM
4.3 out of 5
Securonix excels in behavioral analytics and ease of use. In comparison, Splunk offers flexibility with data sources and advanced customizability, making it ideal for complex environments. Securonix serves cloud-focused organizations, while Splunk benefits those prioritizing extensive data analytics and integration.
Download Securonix Next-Gen SIEM vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup costs are significantly lower, while Splunk Enterprise Security's setup costs are higher. This difference highlights the cost-effectiveness of Securonix when comparing initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Securonix Next-Gen SIEM setup costs are significantly lower, while Splunk Enterprise Security's setup costs are higher. This difference highlights the cost-effectiveness of Securonix when comparing initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust log management and operational intelligence for comprehensive security solutions, which makes it ideal for organizations focused on compliance and quick problem resolution. In comparison, Cribl's cost-effective data processing and routing features optimize storage costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
Download Cribl vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs than Cribl, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has higher setup costs than Cribl, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment option.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security provides advanced threat detection and robust incident management, making it ideal for complex needs. In comparison, Exabeam's user-friendly interface and effective behavioral analytics cater well to smaller enterprises through flexible pricing and straightforward deployment.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Exabeam, which is considered more cost-effective in implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Exabeam, which is considered more cost-effective in implementation.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced analytics and threat detection for security professionals, appealing to those seeking complex capabilities. In comparison, SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server provides an affordable, easy-to-deploy solution, making it attractive for basic central logging and small to medium-sized enterprises.
Download SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a higher setup cost, offering an extensive range of features, while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server provides a cost-effective solution with basic capabilities, highlighting significant differences in pricing and feature depth between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a higher setup cost, offering an extensive range of features, while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server provides a cost-effective solution with basic capabilities, highlighting significant differences in pricing and feature depth between the two solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in real-time monitoring and flexible data storage, ideal for compliance needs. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite integrates easily with Google resources, offering detailed application insights. Tech buyers choose based on integration needs and cost structures.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Google Cloud's operations suite, which offers a cost-efficient alternative with simplified integration.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs compared to Google Cloud's operations suite, which offers a cost-efficient alternative with simplified integration.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ManageEngine Log360
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data visualization, scalability, and integration, appealing to large enterprises needing robust analytics. In comparison, ManageEngine Log360 provides cost-effective application log monitoring and an intuitive dashboard, suitable for smaller teams prioritizing easy deployment and affordability.
Download ManageEngine Log360 vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost, whereas ManageEngine Log360 offers a more affordable initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a high setup cost, whereas ManageEngine Log360 offers a more affordable initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sentinel
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security's robust analytics excel in transforming data into insights, suiting large environments. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel integrates smoothly with Azure, ideal for those using Microsoft's cloud. Splunk's cost is a concern, while Sentinel offers predictable pricing within Microsoft's ecosystem.
Download Sentinel vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Sentinel, which offers a more budget-friendly option for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher initial setup cost compared to Sentinel, which offers a more budget-friendly option for implementation.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive log management, while IBM SevOne NPM excels in network monitoring. In comparison, Splunk's extensibility supports custom solutions, and IBM SevOne NPM provides deep network insights. A tech buyer might choose based on specific operational intelligence or network performance needs.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs higher setup costs than IBM SevOne, which is known for more accessible pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security typically incurs higher setup costs than IBM SevOne, which is known for more accessible pricing.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security manages large data volumes with advanced analytics, while Sumo Logic Security is noted for its real-time observability and ease of use. In comparison, Sumo Logic offers customizable search capabilities, whereas Splunk provides robust support for hybrid deployment environments.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs compared to Sumo Logic Security, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs compared to Sumo Logic Security, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust log management and scalability, ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Coralogix focuses on next-generation log analysis and affordability, appealing to businesses seeking rapid deployment and lower costs with AI capabilities. Each solution caters to different operational needs.
Download Coralogix vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves significant setup costs, whereas Coralogix offers a more streamlined initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves significant setup costs, whereas Coralogix offers a more streamlined initial cost.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Stellar Cyber Open XDR
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security is valued for its detailed analytics and scalability offering insights into threats. In comparison, Stellar Cyber Open XDR excels in advanced threat detection and automation. This emphasizes Splunk's data processing strengths versus Stellar Cyber's focus on ease of integration and automation.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Stellar Cyber Open XDR Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides a more economical solution, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while Stellar Cyber Open XDR provides a more economical solution, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence budget-conscious buyers.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust scalability and diverse data integrations, ideal for compliance-focused organizations. In comparison, Devo excels in real-time analytics with user-friendly interfaces. Buyers might choose Splunk for comprehensive analysis or Devo for cost-effective, flexible environments.
Download Devo vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often has a higher setup cost compared to Devo, which is generally praised for its affordability and simpler installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often has a higher setup cost compared to Devo, which is generally praised for its affordability and simpler installation process.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log analysis with strong customization, ideal for enterprises seeking robust scalability. In comparison, USM Anywhere is appealing for its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, making it attractive to SMBs requiring integrated threat intelligence and vulnerability scanning.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. USM Anywhere Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a substantial setup cost, while USM Anywhere features a more competitive initial pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves a substantial setup cost, while USM Anywhere features a more competitive initial pricing structure.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Logs
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management with scalable data ingestion and schema-on-read technology, enhancing incident response. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Logs integrates seamlessly with VMware's ecosystem. Tech buyers might choose Splunk for advanced features or VMware for cost efficiency.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. VMware Aria Operations for Logs Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced security analytics, while VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers a lower setup cost, emphasizing streamlined log management functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced security analytics, while VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers a lower setup cost, emphasizing streamlined log management functionalities.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced threat detection, handling large data volumes with customization. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer provides seamless integration within the ManageEngine suite. In comparison, Splunk excels in high-speed data processing, while ManageEngine focuses on ease of adoption and cost-efficiency.
Download ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security setup costs are typically high, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer often presents a more budget-friendly option. The significant price difference highlights their distinct market positions and target user bases.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security setup costs are typically high, while ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer often presents a more budget-friendly option. The significant price difference highlights their distinct market positions and target user bases.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Anomali
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data analytics and flexible deployment, ideal for deep security insights. In comparison, Anomali specializes in threat intelligence integration, offering ease of integration, proactive threat management, and a high ROI with efficient threat detection and analysis.
Download Anomali vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while Anomali offers a more budget-friendly setup alternative, making Anomali an attractive option for those prioritizing initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost, while Anomali offers a more budget-friendly setup alternative, making Anomali an attractive option for those prioritizing initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers robust log management and rapid searches, integrating diverse data for operational intelligence, making it ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Moogsoft provides AI-driven event management, focusing on noise reduction and alert consolidation, appealing to businesses needing efficient incident handling.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a substantial setup cost, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a substantial setup cost, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers scalable log management and customizable dashboards, ideal for compliance and analytics, focusing on flexibility and integration. In comparison, ArcSight ESM excels in diverse data ingestion and threat detection, despite complex installation, providing strong correlation capabilities for security incidents.
Download ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs, while ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) offers a more economical alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security involves higher setup costs, while ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) offers a more economical alternative.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in comprehensive analysis suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Logpoint offers a cost-effective solution with a simpler licensing model, making it attractive for smaller organizations. Each solution has unique strengths catering to different organizational needs and budgets.
Download Logpoint vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs compared to Logpoint, which tends to be more cost-effective initially for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs compared to Logpoint, which tends to be more cost-effective initially for organizations.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
NetWitness Platform
3.7 out of 5
NetWitness Platform focuses on cost-effective threat detection with easy deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data integration with comprehensive capabilities. Both differ in cost and customization, leaving tech buyers to prioritize ease or advanced analytics in their decision.
Download NetWitness Platform vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
NetWitness Platform offers a customizable setup cost, allowing flexibility based on deployment needs, while Splunk Enterprise Security typically has higher initial setup expenses, reflecting its advanced out-of-the-box features.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness Platform offers a customizable setup cost, allowing flexibility based on deployment needs, while Splunk Enterprise Security typically has higher initial setup expenses, reflecting its advanced out-of-the-box features.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ArcSight Logger
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
ArcSight Logger
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers rapid search and flexibility, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, ArcSight Logger ensures robust log management with scalability. Splunk's varied deployment suits diverse needs, while ArcSight's integration aids existing systems. Both products offer distinct value propositions for tech buyers.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, while ArcSight Logger typically offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations with tighter financial constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, while ArcSight Logger typically offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations with tighter financial constraints.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Trellix ESM
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in data analysis and query capabilities, suiting complex data needs. In comparison, Trellix ESM provides effective threat intelligence and ease of integration, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking comprehensive SIEM capabilities. Splunk offers versatile deployment, while Trellix delivers budget-friendly solutions.
Download Splunk Enterprise Security vs. Trellix ESM Report
Splunk Enterprise Security setup cost can be high, focusing on advanced features, while Trellix ESM offers a more affordable setup with a simpler integration process, highlighting the contrast between feature depth versus cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security setup cost can be high, focusing on advanced features, while Trellix ESM offers a more affordable setup with a simpler integration process, highlighting the contrast between feature depth versus cost efficiency.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Check Point Security Management
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers advanced data handling, excelling in log management and rapid searching. In comparison, Check Point Security Management focuses on centralized control and robust firewall capabilities, making it ideal for network security. Splunk's scalability contrasts Check Point's comprehensive on-premises solutions.
Download Check Point Security Management vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to the lower setup cost of Check Point Security Management, highlighting a key difference in initial financial requirements for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to the lower setup cost of Check Point Security Management, highlighting a key difference in initial financial requirements for deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Falcon LogScale
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Falcon LogScale
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers comprehensive threat detection features, while Falcon LogScale excels in efficient log management. In comparison, Falcon LogScale stands out for its streamlined deployment, making it appealing to businesses prioritizing quick integration over extensive security capabilities offered by Splunk Enterprise Security.
Download Falcon LogScale vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Falcon LogScale, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expenditure option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost compared to Falcon LogScale, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expenditure option.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Seq
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Seq
1 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security delivers extensive threat detection and incident response capabilities. In comparison, Seq offers a developer-friendly environment and efficient log management. A tech buyer might choose Splunk for its comprehensive security, or select Seq for its cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment.
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set, while Seq provides a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses seeking straightforward, efficient log management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set, while Seq provides a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses seeking straightforward, efficient log management solutions.
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Google Security Operations
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers holistic visibility with advanced analytics, ideal for comprehensive security insights. In comparison, Google Security Operations provides exceptional integration and automation within Google's ecosystem, appealing to enterprises prioritizing cloud-centric operations. Splunk excels in data management, while Google is preferred for simplified deployment.
Download Google Security Operations vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs significant setup costs, while Google Security Operations typically presents lower initial financial barriers, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often incurs significant setup costs, while Google Security Operations typically presents lower initial financial barriers, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront investment requirements.

Related categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Log Management
IT Operations Analytics