Exabeam Fusion is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:
-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Exabeam | 1.7% |
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 7.0% |
| IBM Security QRadar | 5.2% |
| Other | 86.1% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) | Apr 12, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Apr 12, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Exabeam vs Splunk Enterprise Security | Apr 12, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Exabeam vs Wazuh | Apr 12, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | Exabeam vs IBM Security QRadar | Apr 12, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 4.3 | 3.3% | 97% | 138 interviewsAdd to research |
| Wazuh | 3.7 | 5.1% | 81% | 50 interviewsAdd to research |
Exabeam's organization is perceived as rigid with delays in response time and a need for improved customer commitment. They lack comprehensive flow analysis and need advancement in the MITRE ATT&CK Framework. Challenges include slow UI, limited customization, inadequate documentation, and integration issues. Users face difficulties with log management, API interaction, false positives, and adaptability. Enhancements in reporting, dashboarding, and cloud integration are suggested. Adding certifications and improving technical support would be beneficial.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 191 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 101 |
| Large Enterprise | 318 |
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Solution Architect at CTC | 4.0 | I find Exabeam's UEBA, automation, and ML excellent for SIEM. However, I've noted poor integration capabilities and market visibility issues. I rate its stability and scalability highly and consider its pricing affordable. |
| Cyber Security Analyst at Capgemini | 4.5 | I use Exabeam for detection and behavioral analytics, finding its UI and incident investigation useful. While generally stable (8/10) and user-friendly, I wish the dashboard filtered by recent detections instead of just highest risk. I recommend it. |
| Lead Technical Engineer Security at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | I found Exabeam effective as a SIEM, speeding investigations with profiling and timeline features. However, documentation, customization, and customer support are unsatisfactory. I recommend it for small-to-medium organizations seeking a modern SIEM. |
| Analyst at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | We primarily use Exabeam for advanced analytics and anomaly detection via machine learning, complementing our SIEM. The on-prem version has limitations with the UI and custom rule administration, prompting us to consider migrating to SaaS. |
| Technical Analyst 4 at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | I found Exabeam easy to use for security analysis, incident detection, and UBA, benefiting from its automation and ML. However, I experienced slowness, integration issues, and high false positives, limiting its suitability for larger organizations. |
| Solutions Architect at ostec | 4.0 | I use Exabeam for SIEM and UEBA, praising its correlation and behavior analytics. While out-of-the-box integration needs improvement, its AI, cost reduction, and stability make me recommend this solution, which I rate 8/10. |
| Senior SOC Developer at XVE Security | 4.0 | I appreciate Exabeam's strong automation and AI-driven behavior analytics for incident management. While its reporting needs improvement and pricing isn't cheap, I rate it 8/10 for its stability and ease of integration as a SIEM. |
| Lead Consultant at Neutrino Tech Systems | 4.5 | I use Exabeam for consolidating diverse web service logs, appreciating its easy setup and stability. My main problem is the UI, which makes finding specific logs and server details difficult, impacting scalability. Despite this, I recommend it. |
