We performed a comparison between ScienceLogic and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Operations Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I'm satisfied with ScienceLogicfor for what they can offer today because they can offer both serverless connectivity and agent connectivity."
"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."
"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."
"Its ITSM and EMS combination is really amazing. There is no need to purchase two products, one for ITSM and a second for EMS/NMS."
"Power packs."
"One of the valuable features is rapid dashboards."
"From the class that I took this week, being able to create notable events from whatever you find in the data set is pretty useful."
"We solve issues that we previously could not since we now have the data."
"Splunk gives my clients the ability to bring multiple, disparate types of data together, then correlate and report on them."
"The solution has plenty of features that are good."
"This is a straightforward solution, easy to configure."
"It has helped us look at modern technology, as well as penetrate our legacy systems, to see where the bottlenecks are."
"The correlation searches are most valuable just because we are able to do things like RBA."
"The connections to the database are very good and updating the data files is simple to do. The dashboards are useful and user-friendly."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."
"They should improve database issues in HA and Failover mode, and provide documentation for all users , even if they are not customers."
"They should add CLI command modes and scripts for high performance."
"There are often bugs in new releases."
"One important area we feel could be improved is the UI. It takes a lot of clicks to do very simple tasks."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
"While scheduled reports can be embedded, Splunk dashboard can not be embedded directly without enabling cross origin."
"The CIM model is the method Splunk uses to normalize data and categorize its important parts, but it is quite complex."
"There can be a bit of complexity around some fields during the initial setup."
"Professional support is great, but too expensive."
"They can incorporate the SOAR solution within the actual product so that we do not require two different products, two different installations, and two different pricing methods. In regards to UBA, I am familiar with the UBA that existed two years ago. I am not updated about it today, but two years ago, UBA required such an amount of data that from a cost perspective, it was not worth it. When you compare it to what you get out of the box with Microsoft Sentinel without additional costs, there is no match."
"While Splunk Enterprise Security offers valuable features, its cost is high and could be more competitive."
"When you get into large amounts of data, Splunk can get pretty slow. This is the same on-premise or AWS, it doesn't matter. The way that they handle large data sets could be improved."
"Not even Splunk's support guy, who came to our firm, could help with defining proper role management."
ScienceLogic is ranked 4th in IT Operations Analytics with 42 reviews while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in IT Operations Analytics with 228 reviews. ScienceLogic is rated 8.6, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security. See our ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.
We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.