LogRhythm SIEM Reviews

It's our primary threat-hunting tool. We use it to look for anomalies. We use it for investigations. We use it for just about everything security related. If we find it in another tool, we use the SIEM to cross reference what activity we would see either from that user or from that machine that we saw in the other tool.

It's improved our organization in a number of ways. 

Before we got the current SIEM, for example, the previous SIEM was not our primary threat-hunting tool. It was a data point we would go to occasionally.  Today, LogRhythm SIEM is our primary threat-hunting tool thanks to the user-friendly interface, which is much better compared to what we've had previously.

The ability to return relevant information from a search to provide either corroborating evidence for an investigation we were already undergoing or just being in a better place to go hunt for threats has made me feel that the environment is safer than what we had previously. 

Previously, with McAfee SIEM, we had no confidence that it would help us in an investigation, so we frequently did not lean on it. It let us down so many times. LogRhythm SIEM gives us a sense of confidence that, during an investigation, it's a solid source of information that we can use to complement the investigation or perhaps complete the entire investigation within the SIEM.

Our previous SIEM did not have dashboards, so there wasn't a starting point. With our previous SIEM, we had to have a specific thing we were looking for, and only then we could find it. 

The dashboards in the LogRhythm SIEM really help us as a starting point. It gives us a starting point we can go to every day. We walk through several dashboards to see anomalous activity for further investigation. The dashboards, therefore, are our favorite feature of the SIEM.

The solution helped with productivity and the ability to process logs. We do Event Log Filtering for certain log types, which we don't want in our SIEM as they're just too noisy. Having too much noise in the SIEM makes it harder to find relevant things. Therefore, we use Log Filtering to limit the noise. It's also given us the ability to bring more logs in, so we bring them all from all of our workstations and servers. Doing the log filtering this way allowed us to bring in other log sources and keep the noise manageable.

It's helped reduce our administrative overhead. Before we started doing the log filtering, we exceeded our license capacity for what we were licensed in terms of logs in our SIEM. The filtering allowed us to bring the noise down and helped us with the removal of junk logs that are not useful. We have a lot of firewalls, and anytime you're traversing internally inside of the firewall, it generates a lot of traffic. That kind of traffic is the type of traffic we took out, allowing us to bring our workstation traffic logs in to give us a better view of our environment.

It's very big for us that the solution is out-of-the-box. To have the solution be turnkey was significant as it enabled us to ramp up and get the logs onboarded immediately. There wasn't a lot of configuration to get to a point where we could bring logs in. It was essentially turnkey.

We use Windows Event Forwarding to collect the logs from our Windows clients, and the logs get aggregated as one data source on that collector. Therefore, finding logs specific to one particular Windows system requires some creativity in how we search the SIEM. 

I've heard that in a future release, it may come to a point where the Windows systems would be dedicated log sources, so you can choose just that log source. That would greatly improve our ability to threat hunt with our SIEM.

We've been using this LogRhythm SIEM for about three and a half years.

The solution's been very stable for us. We bought a high-availability solution, so we have two systems in a high-availability pair. That redundancy gives us resilience. It comforts us to know that if we lose one data center, we've still got logs going into our SIEM in the second data center.

The hardware we bought has the ability to process logs at twice the limit that we are licensed for, and we've not had to increase that. We've had it for three and a half years, and it's robust and keeps up with our needs.

I've had to engage LogRhythm technical support on many occasions. They've always been quick to respond and are very knowledgeable, professional, and helpful.

Positive

The previous SIEM we have was McAfee Nitro. There were a couple of reasons why we switched. We switched due to the fact that it wasn't easy to just stumble into finding things. You had to know what you're looking for and we didn't like that aspect of it. Also, we had a really bad support case that was the catalyst for making the move to a different SIEM.

We have a different setup, and we keep the SIEM in our PCI environment to limit our PCI scope. We had to think through the architecture so that we had the logs in the places we needed them without having our firewalls wide open. It was very quick to deploy since we used Windows Event Log Forwarding. We were able to use a GPO to have logs sent to a centralized server and, from there, ingested directly into the SIEM, so we were onboarded in less than a week's time. We were able to onboard the majority of our log sources quickly.

When we bought the SIEM, we bought a block of professional service hours that we utilized to help implement the SIEM. They were a tremendous help with adding dashboards and getting our fingers in it enough to where we learned our way around it before we actually even got training. It was LogRhythm professional services, and I highly recommend them. They were excellent.

We've absolutely seen an ROI. We felt it immediately since the out-of-the-box dashboards gave us visibility into our environment that we had not seen before, as we didn't have a SIEM that presented the data in a usable manner.

The license model is similar to other SIEM solutions that we looked at, which is a log volume pricing model. That pricing model works well, especially being able to filter the logs and get less important logs in so we have the ability and the headroom to put in other log sources.

We evaluated a few other options. Since we're a government entity, procurement rules limited us to just a handful of options, and of the options that we had, LogRhythm was clearly the better choice for us. 

We had the option to renew and get a refreshed McAfee SIEM, which we didn't feel good about. The other two options that we were able to use were IBM and Rapid7. IBM was just another vendor I've not had good luck with in the past. Rapid7 was a smaller player. We didn't feel they had the ecosystem, the robust ecosystem, to support what we were looking to implement.

I'm a senior security analyst. I work at a government organization that employs between 500 and 1000 people.

We are on-prem with high availability, so we have two self-contained systems, sequel logs, and everything, and they can run either box.

In terms of helping us manage workflows and cybersecurity exposure, we haven't leveraged smart responses in the SIEM. It looks like a powerful asset. We have some automated responses with a different tool for ransomware detection and prevention. However, the workflow ability in the SIEM is actually quite powerful. We just haven't leveraged it since we haven't felt that the right use case presented itself to us yet.

When it comes to affecting our rate of efficiency, we don't measure those metrics, so it's kind of hard to say there's a measurable amount or how much it's improved. It has given us a threat-hunting tool previously unavailable to us. We are very happy to have the SIEM be our primary threat-hunting tool.

Those who say SIEM is an outdated security solution should note that SIEM technology has been around for a very long time. It's still relevant thanks to the continual development that companies have done to bring more usability to extracting threats from logs. That's timeless. That's not something that's going to go away over time. The LogRhythm SIEM continues to add features, and improvements and makes finding and presenting data from raw logs easier. Digging through logs before we had a SIEM was tedious and very time-consuming. It's made it a big-time saver. To have the way it presents the logs in a usable manner has been a tremendous help for us.

I'd rate it a solid nine out of ten.

We have a lot of use cases. Originally, it started out pulling in a bunch of the logs so we could get some ideas on network traffic. More recently, we have proceeded with pulling in logs from some of our other vendors. This really helped out a lot with our AV, which didn't always notify us as quickly as we wanted it to. LogRhythm made it possible for us to get notifications faster so that we can remediate things faster. We've been expanding it more and more as we've gone through the years to include more traffic, giving us more insight into our network.

LogRhythm really gave us a better understanding of what our overall risk is within our network and has opened our eyes to include other products that helped address different types of issues. Whether it's getting into vulnerability scanners or different pieces of other software, it's opened the door to what's out there. It helped us to turn on different features or other products along the way and helped us to identify what we need to improve on and present it to our executive team.

One of the main features that I like about LogRhythm SIEM is that there are a lot of pre-built pieces. Like with our AV, we didn't have to tell it how to read the logs; they already had it pre-made. So, we essentially just had to follow their guide to get the logs imported in and set up some rules for it. We've only had to manually create the parsing rules for a few of our vendors so that we could interpret the logs correctly. Most of them had already been pre-created for us.

We use the Event Log Filtering feature a lot. We use it for simple troubleshooting tasks like when a user is logged out, to more important tasks like trying to investigate a threat. As far as its effect on productivity, we can go and search instead of trying to troubleshoot and guess what is causing an error. We can identify what the program is or where the hiccup is.

LogRhythm helped us to identify a lot of blind spots. Originally, we didn't have a SIEM tool. We had auditors say that this is something that we should be doing. My management team asked me to go and find a product, and I researched a bunch of them and found LogRhythm. It really opened our eyes to see how much traffic we have, whether it's other IP addresses that are scanning us or external users trying to hit certain ports that could then get closed. It helped us tighten down some of those firewall rules that may have been left open unintentionally through other changes. It helped us a lot early on to identify who was trying to communicate with us or, essentially, who was trying to attack us.

As far as our overall security posture, our SIEM tool was the initial push that really got us going into identifying where all of our threats were. We expanded over the seven years that we've had it, and I implemented at least eight other products that are all security related because the SIEM tool indicated the need to identify other risks. It really helped us as an organization to identify risks and move forward to a more secure environment.

When we originally got LogRhythm, their tech support was fantastic, and I loved them. Now, we don't quite get as quick of a response. I've been disappointed in the more recent tech support. When you call in, they'll say that they will get you somebody, and you'll finally get someone who will contact you back a day or so later. Whereas before, I would get help right away.

We've had LogRhythm for almost seven years now.

It's very stable. We've been on the same system for the seven years that we've had the product. We've had no issues and haven't even had to upgrade any of the systems or increase anything hardware-wise up to this point.

I haven't really had much of a chance to do any scalability because we haven't had to scale anything up. Ours is a virtual instance, and if we needed to scale up, we could just shut the server down, add some more resources, spin it back up, and it would be good to go.

Initially, tech support was a solid ten out of ten when we first started. Over the last couple of years, they have changed how they handle tech support requests, and the response time decreased from what it used to be. You call in, they'll take your information, and then they'll call you back later. That can take 24 hours or more. When you actually do get somebody on the phone, they're very good and know exactly what they're doing. They'll take care of you.

In terms of response time, I'd give tech support a six out of ten, but in terms of how good they are as tech support, I'd give them a seven or eight.

Neutral

We didn't have a designated security person on staff, and our auditors came in and said that we should be doing this. As a help desk person, I looked for something specific that was going to give me the flexibility I need but also allow me to spin up and run while doing the rest of my duties, and LogRhythm was the best one that I found that could do that.

It's pretty complex to set up, in a way. However, now that I've done it and have done an upgrade as well, it doesn't seem as bad.

I did something wrong on one of the initial upgrades, and it threw an error. I called in support, and they immediately jumped in and started working on a lot of the backend pieces that I don't normally touch. It's pretty complicated if you have to get into that, and that's where the tech support comes in.

With this last upgrade, I did not run into any errors, and it went through just fine. I thought that I was going to be doing this for six hours throughout the day, and I got it done within two or three hours.

I set it up and upgraded it twice, once with help from LogRhythm and once all by myself.

We're on a perpetual license, but they're trying to move us to a subscription-based license. We've been with them for so long, and we'd like to keep it the way it is rather than switch to a subscription-based license.

We looked at four products including QRadar and Rapid7 InsightIDR. We did POCs for all four solutions, and LogRhythm was the best solution for our needs.

One of LogRhythm's distinguishing features was its AI engine which analyzed the tools and allowed it to alert for specific events, instead of me having to dig down and create all these rules. It came with pre-created rules.

Another piece that was really important was the implementation. They had a lot of pieces for third-party vendors as well. We could pull in the logs. All we had to do is just create a rule that says, "alert." It came pre-programmed with a lot of alarms that would automatically correlate with our AV, along with our firewall. We didn't have to create them because they just came in pre-made, and that was a big feature that we looked for. Just implementing it or adding to it didn't take up too much time.

If you are one who thinks that SIEM is an outdated security tool, I would be very curious to know what other solution would be better than a SIEM to accomplish the same goals. A SIEM tool gives you such an open perspective into what is going on in your network and gives you the ability to dig in if you really need to. Whereas if you have a completely managed solution or one that uses AI and does everything for you but doesn't provide you the logs, you might know what's wrong but won't know what else is going on out there. With a SIEM tool, you can dig in as far as you want to, and specifically with LogRhythm, you can be as hands-free as you want to be. It'll tell you what's wrong, and you can address those problems. You have a lot more flexibility with LogRhythm SIEM.

Overall, I'd rate LogRhythm SIEM a nine out of ten. I really enjoyed the solution. If you have to program anything yourself, there is a little bit of a learning curve. They've got lots of guides that you can use, and depending on your skill set, you may be able to figure it out sooner rather than later. The resources are all there, and the community is there to help you, which makes the product really great and easy to use.

I found it very useful in our day-to-day operations with monitoring user activity and looking at system analytics and system performance. I found it very useful when investigating threats like IPs, and seeing what's going on with our endpoints, like certain lateral movements that we've noticed. 

I definitely found it very useful when looking at, for example, a compromised host, or a suspicious IP that has been scanning us. I've definitely found it very useful when I look at a log, it'll give me a detailed drill-down of all the information that's needed, including what the rating is, the rating of the threat, and what actions should be taken. 

It gives my team a better idea of what we should do to improve our security posture.

It's improved our organization. For example, if we have a user who's traveling overseas, or we get a suspicious login from the VPN, from a country that we're unfamiliar with, it gives us the ingest logs. The SIEM gives us a better comprehension of what type of threat activity it is and helps us decide if it's benign or legitimate.

Looking at the logs and how much detail each log has when it is ingested into our dashboards is quite useful. I found it very useful when looking at, for example, what emails are inbound and outbound of our networks. 

I like how detail-oriented the logs are in terms of what the origin is and what network it's coming from. 

I also like how the detailed logs give us what host or user it's coming from. On sight, I have a pretty cohesive understanding of what threat intelligence looks like in terms of reviewing what we have to deal with.

I use the Event Log Filtering feature daily. Every day when I look at event logs, I use the filters on certain time ranges and AIU engine rules. Overall, it's had a very positive impact. It helps us expedite certain security incidences very quickly, thanks to how detail-oriented the logs are. It really helps me report threats to my supervisor. For example, if someone's trying to scan us, my boss will ask me, "Can you look into this further?" I'll go ahead, and use the searches and the lists that the LogRhythm console has to offer, and I will get back to him in a timely fashion, with more details on the threat. 

The Event Log Filtering feature has definitely helped reduce administrative overhead. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it a seven.

It helps us manage workflows and cybersecurity exposure. In terms of managing workflows, it definitely has given us leverage on what our overall security posture is, and gives us a better understanding of what we need to focus on more in terms of what threats are persisting. Our workflows have been pretty seamless so far. I would say our workflow is pretty seamless in terms of static manual investigations.

In terms of blind spots and our ability to shut down attacks, while we don't see all the blind spots, it gives us enough understanding and information about where we can classify a threat. 

Overall, it's had a very positive impact on our security posture. It gives us good visibility of what we need to see right now. It definitely gives us a better understanding of what we deal with, and what we should focus on in terms of what threats are more critical than others. In terms of our daily operations, it's very helpful.

It's positively affected our overall rate of efficiency. It's given us what we need for now. We're looking to improve our efficiency by looking into what LogRhythm offers in its newer products. Still, it's pretty efficient. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it around eight or nine in terms of efficiency. My immediate coworkers in my department could use what we have right now for looking at critical alerts, user analytics, and overall IT operations since we usually have daily operations where we look at all user activity throughout our organization.

So far, it's pretty robust, and yet, we look for more improvements.

On a day-to-day basis, maybe we could look for more improvements with automation, however, so far, it's good.

In terms of blind spots, we are looking for more improvements since we don't have visibility over everything. Right now, we just use LogRhythm for our on-prem solution, not our cloud solution. We could definitely use more improvements with that in the next product.

Ingesting logs into the web console user interface and probably updating the threat intelligence database are the two places where we'd like to see improvement. We get a lot of noise. Oftentimes, we see a lot of false positives, so possibly using AI or machine learning would be ideal. Implementing that more into the next product would help us actually determine whether it's a false positive or legitimate threat.

I've used the solution for about a year and three months.

In terms of using it on-premises, it is very stable. Granted, we have some hiccups here and there. However, that's what we reach out to tech support for. They're able to provide us with immediate support, and they're willing to really put in the effort to figure out what the cause of the problem is and will work until it's fixed in a timely fashion. 

The scalability is, so far, very robust. I look forward to hearing more about the latest LogRhythm products and what they can do in terms of on-premises and cloud.

The product offers excellent service and technical sport. They're very prompt with getting back to our team regardless of the severity of the incident. Overall, I've had a great experience with this so far.

Positive

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. 

Those that say SIEM is an outdated security system, don't understand cyber security. SIEM is what allows analysts like myself to be successful. Without a SIEM, how can we see everything? We can't.

LogRhythm works within the core of our SOC. It's where our analysts work every day and where we do all of our investigatory work for security incidents.

It created our security posture. It is the central component of all of our security tools and it is the heartbeat of our SOC and our daily operations. It sets the tone for everything that we do.

This solution improves our organization daily. It saves us countless hours doing correlation work and reduces our investigatory process from days to hours. It routinely brings issues to the forefront using the AI engine and the use cases that we've built that need investigating. We constantly find new sources of logs to bring into the system to continue to make it better. 

LogRhythm does a very good job of helping SOCs manage their workflows. Our SOC is very young and we're not leveraging that feature yet. I've seen other companies' SOCs and watched them use the workflow features and it's incredibly well done. We're not mature enough yet to use it. 

For cybersecurity exposures, the one downside from LogRhythm's perspective is that it can only tell me about use cases that I've already defined. It cannot identify unknown cases at this time. However, we have just recently purchased the NDR solution and that does have this capability.

This solution is our principal mechanism for doing all investigatory work. When we get alerts from LogRhythm, we'd go back to the logs and trace those events back to their source. This is is how we shut down attacks. 

One of the features that we use the most and find the most valuable includes the Web Console. My analysts really like the interface and the ability to build queries using point-and-click without having to write Query languages. My favorite feature is the actual Admin Console and the ability to monitor all aspects of the SIEM's health and the ability to build new use cases for my analysts to work with.

We also use the Machine Data Intelligence feature for classifying and contextualizing logs. It does struggle with unknown log sources and we've had some challenges over the years getting new log sources incorporated into the MDI Fabric.

The ability to authenticate successes and failures using MDI is incredibly easy. For the log sources that we bring into the SIEM, that work is pretty much done for us by the MDI. We don't have to do any additional work.

One of the challenges of the SIEM for the LogRhythm 7 platform is the amount of time it takes to bring new log sources into the MDI. We've waited a couple of years on some sources before they were incorporated. Writing our own custom MDIs is very challenging because it requires expert-level regex in order to write those rules and to make them efficient. Bringing in sources that aren't natively understood is where we've struggled the most.

We have been using LogRhythm SIEM Solution for six years.

The stability of the solution, if it's deployed properly with the right resources, is rock solid. We have not experienced any performance issues. When we first bought the SIEM, we undersized it, and the performance was compromised. 

This is a scalable solution. I've load-tested the SIEM at its current resource allocations up to four or five times as much as my daily ingest and the system handled it just fine.

Their technical support is second to none and is one of the reasons why we continue to invest in and consider LogRhythm as a strategic partner. Their support team are really good at their jobs and they always come through when we need them. I would rate their support a ten out of ten. 

Positive

LogRhythm is the first SIEM I have used and the only SIEM I have a lot of experience with. I've demoed other SIEMs and we've gone to market twice to look at whether LogRhythm was still the right decision. Both times we concluded that it was.

The setup of the SIEM is complex in its own right. LogRhythm typically recommends professional services assistance to deploy the SIEM properly. My company did not purchase those professional services so I had to figure it out for myself. Their support structure was so good and they helped me so much that we were able to get it working without professional help. 

LogRhythm is an out-of-box solution and this was why we bought it. I had no experience with SIEM when we bought it six years ago. I needed something that I could plug into the network, get up and running and get value out of immediately.

We get a vast amount of ROI from this solution. We get way more out of it than we put into it. One of the metrics that I track pretty closely in our SOC is the mean time to detect. Prior to the SIEM, the mean time to detect was measured in weeks and it's now measured in minutes.

LogRhythm's pricing and licensing are extremely competitive and it's one of the top three reasons we continue to invest in the platform. 

We looked at Securonix, Azure Sentinel, IBM's QRoC, and QRadar on Cloud. What really won us over with LogRhythm was the ease of use of the interface and the simplicity of the underlying architecture. It really lends itself to being a low-cost solution to own over time.

The nice thing about LogRhythm is that they continue to innovate and come up with new capabilities like their NDR solution that we recently invested in. They continue to stay relevant. 

I would rate LogRhythm a nine out of ten. The on-prem version of the solution is fantastic and is the core of my SOC. It's our daily tool for all of our investigations. 

I am a security architect, so I don't develop the use cases with the customers if they deliver a team who is in charge of these activities. Depending on the case of the customer, we define something with the customers, according to the technical sessions that we have with them. I prepare all the documentation for the delivery team and present the project.

LogRhythm is deployed on-prem. There are about 60 people using this solution in my organization.

SOAR is integrated with the dashboard that we use for threat management. Because it's all integrated, it is useful for us when we deploy something on-prem.

I don't think the cloud model in LogRhythm is developed enough. This is one of the reasons they changed the position in a negative way in the Magic Quadrant Gartner for SIEM in the recent report. The cost of UBA is also high when you compare it with Securonix.

I would like to have a different cost model for cloud. If that happens, I think LogRhythm could be competitive in other cases with the customers.

The virtual machines require a high computer power, and sometimes customers say it's expensive. There are specific requirements from this solution. LogRhythm has a specific requirement when implementing in virtual machines, which is a very complicated issue. The best solution is in the cloud, most of the time.

I've been using this solution for more than five years.

It's stable.

When we are using LogRhythm in the cloud, it is scalable, but it's more expensive than other solutions. When we are on-prem, it's a little complicated and has a lot of challenges that the customer doesn't want.

It is scalable in the cloud, but not on-prem. It is not easy. It takes more time and money. I would rate it 3 out of 5.

I would rate the presale support 3 out of 5. They could be in contact more and give more information. It's average. I have heard that post-sale support is good.

It's simple because you only need to consider one component and that's it. But if you have a customer with different companies and each company has different subsidiaries and all of them want one only service, all of them will be sending the logs into one single SIEM, so you need a distributed architecture. You need to think about how to include new components and how that will be impacting the architecture in the near future, because we don't know the cost. In some cases, it's complicated if we don't know the new versions or the changes that the vendor will be publishing.

Deployment commonly takes three months but can take up to six months.

We use about six people for maintenance.

We deploy the solutions on our own.

I would rate the pricing 4 out of 5. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees.

The customers commonly want to know what is the price for the service in different bands. So we work on a banded price model, and it is something that is complicated. We include the UEBA, which is sized and quoted in terms of the number of users and entities. So we need to make a price banded model for the SIEM and a price banded model for the UEBA. We need two of them and they are related. 

If you increase the number of users, you are increasing the cost of the service of the SIEM. Sometimes we don't know the exact relationship between these two components. In the case of other solutions in the cloud, like Securonix, you just need to say to the customer, "This is the price of the different bands."

I've evaluated solutions that can be deployed in the cloud and have other features or components, like the UEBA. In the case of Securonix, it is included. We need to decide if we are going to propose something that is on-prem or in the cloud, depending on the requirements of the customer. The architecture is more complicated when you deploy something on-prem, so you want to increase the number of EPS, the events per second. You need to consider the architecture.

With Securonix or Splunk, we just need to go to the partner and say, we need an increase in the number of EPS. We also don't have to provide maintenance to the solution because it is in the cloud. Our specialist is more focused on the security aspects instead of providing maintenance to the components.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.

My advice is that if the requirement is to have someone on-prem, for example, someone that is working in a financial entity, it is a requirement to have all the information in their own data centers and using specific connections. If you have that case, you can use it. It is convenient. And you can use it if you have a case where the evolution of the environment is not going to change for the next three years. Otherwise, if you have a lot of changes during the time that you are going to be using this solution, you need to include different components that will probably be complicated to architect.

We primarily use the solution to reducing insider threats. We also use the product to deal with some aspects of banking security. For example, with its product, we are able to lower the threat of being attacked by malware.

I appreciate the fact that I can do everything from one dashboard. That is the main aspect of LogRhythm so far that I find extremely useful. We don't need a different dashboard or other solution for managing things.

The initial setup is simple. 

The solution is stable.

The product is great for medium to large-scale organizations.

The product can scale. 

Technical support is reportedly quite good.

What I would suggest is for the product to make the consoles more user-friendly. The integration module should be simpler. That way, that the end-customer himself can do the integration and they are not always dependent on our site. The integration with other vendors should be easy.

The solution is likely not the best option for a smaller organization.

One of the features I like to recommend is a LogRhythm queuing ticket for a level-one tier system so that clients are not dependent on a third party.

We've been working with the product since 2018. It's been almost three years at this point.

The solution is very stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

In terms of scaling, the solution is best for medium to large companies. Smaller companies likely do not want to invest in IT security products, however, for medium to large organizations, especially banks, LogRhythm works well.

It's easy to scale. What we do for scalability is we always put the hardware capability higher than the license. For example, if a customer wants a 3,000 MPS license, we always provide 6,000 MPS hardware. If they want to scale the license to 4,000 or 5,000, we just put the license in, and then it works as the size capacity is there. It's easy. It's not that difficult.

We are not an end-user and therefore do not directly deal with technical support. In terms of the support, the end-user would get a response from the technical team, and, so far, from the feedback I've gotten, they are good. Clients seem satisfied with the level of service they receive.

I also work with Oracle. 

The initial setup is simple for us, basically. It's not that challenging. The main challenge we face for integration is from the different vendors as we have to do different tasks. However,  the deployment of LogRhythm is very easy.

It takes 12 to 15 days for a full deployment.

We have two phases that are five to seven days each. The second phase involves integration and tuning stuff and that can usually take six or seven days for that part alone.

It's on a Windows server. Windows is very convenient for everyone. Users can just follow the process as per LogRhythm and it's easy to deploy everything.

In our distribution model, we don't provide end-user support directly. We have another partner company that provides maintenance and support for the end-user. For the partner side, many of the engineers are LogRhythm certified and they do the maintenance and other tasks.

As an implementor, we can handle the setup for our clients. 

LogRhythm pricing is based on the MPS. They always quote the pricing per unit of MPS. The number of MPS which the customer needs is what we provide with the unit price and we get a good discount on it, as per LogRhythm.

The price is in USD. For that reason, when we convert from USD to our currency, the pricing seems quite high.  

Everything is included. We get the data processing license as well as the sole license and the filing, ticketing, monitoring licenses, and the collector license as well. We get everything in one package.

We are a distributor and we have around 15 to 20 partners who are working with LogRhythm in this region. We work for the end-user and we implement it and handle presentations for the customer.

We are working with the latest version of the solution. I can't speak to the exact version number, however.

I'd rate the solution at a ten out of ten. It's a very good product overall. Clients have been very happy with it. In terms of the feedback we've received from the end-user and our own experience with the deployment process and manageability, everything is great.

I am a distributor and not an end-user of the product, so I cannot comment on use cases.

I would say the most valuable feature of LogRhythm is that it has built-in UEBA functionality, among other basic Windows packages.

What LogRhythm really excels at is its stability, since, in all the deployments that I have been involved in, there's no break-and-fix at all. When the customer finds that there is something lacking from the solution, it is often a matter of deploying extra appliances and things like that. So the most valuable feature in an abstract sense is that it is so reliable. 

I do think there is room for improvement because the system is still running on the Windows Server platform. The problem with running on Windows is that it is not that good for scaling and providing for big deployment environments.

With that said, I think it's good enough. For the most part, I just want to have a consolidated platform for the NDR, i.e. the new MistNet NDR that they have acquired, with the current XDR. At this time, it is still two separate controls.

I have been working with LogRhythm NextGen SIEM from a company perspective for three years. 

All of the deployments that I have been involved in have been very stable, over long periods of time. There's very little in the way of breaking and fixing at all. Most complaints are typically just that the customer comes across extra requirements that need to added on to the base product.

There are some issues with scaling that I'm aware of. Most of the time, the scalability becomes increasingly more complex when increasing the indexing or when processing the loss security complex. It's not easy when we go to a high-volume customer environment where many laptops are involved, for example. In that case, it's perhaps not that easy to scale.

The technical support is good, and they are available at any time. They allocate customer assistants and account managers for taking care of all the application support. Any time that I need a technical fix and the customer is not certified, they will escalate the issue to the customer success manager who will then help solve it.

Compared to other solutions, an advantage of LogRhythm is that it still works on a lot of the old platforms. As mentioned, it is based on the Windows platform, and I think that it wins out due to the straightforward pricing and how easy it is to calculate for the sizing and critical add-ons such as UEBA and SOAR.

Because the platform is always the same, it's just easier to extend it as needed. For example, it's not technically dependent on another solution that's been acquired by themselves or another company like IBM.

The main difference boils down to the question: for add-ons and such, do you need to seek out a different service from a different vendor rather than adding to the same solution by the same company? I believe they do it all from the same R&D teams and it shows.

The deployment for only one small or medium size environment is pretty straightforward, but for enterprise deployments where there are many different components (e.g. various appliances or other software add-ons) it can become very complex, especially for HA setups.

The setup and licensing for small and medium size businesses is straightforward, though when it comes to the enterprise it pays to keep in mind the possibility for complications given all the extras and add-ons that may be required. 

My advice is to take a look at the account directly with the account manager of LogRhythm and find a value-added distributor to support you with the sizing, consulting, use case discovery, and building up the operation maturity roadmap, in order to be truly aligned with the LogRhythm deployment in the long term.

I would rate LogRhythm NextGen SIEM a nine out of ten.

I'm a user, administrator, and analyst. We are using version 7.4.

The solution is deployed on-premise. Three people are working with this product in our company.

Currently, we are in the implementation phase. LogRhythm is better than QRadar from the point of view of collecting Windows events. It has a much higher view. You can enable monitoring by default.

Sometimes the Platform Manager crashes because it's built around Windows.

Every component is on a separate device. Right now we are just integrating log sources. We didn't do any threat intel or use cases until now. I did this with another customer, but with QRadar.

They have to think like IBM. IBM did X-Force public cloud, which is a beautiful tool that gives us threat intel feeds. LogRhythm doesn't have this solution, but maybe they want to integrate this. The Client Console is very bad.

The console is for administrators to add log sources or do some basic investigation. It is a very bad GUI. I think it's very old and built upon an old OS. They have to get rid of it or use a web-based application or develop it in the Client Console application.

I have been using LogRhythm for one year.

It's very scalable. We can scale up or have vertical or horizontal. If you want to add more indexers or connectors, it's easy to implement.

We haven't opened any cases until now. I used to work with QRadar, and sometimes it takes very long to receive a reply from IBM. We didn't experience any use cases until now, but with LogRhythm, we have some delays from the implementation view.

LogRhythm is expanding in my country, Egypt. Multiple customers have moved to LogRhythm. So, they don't have many people for support. We have to schedule a session, and then in implementation engage with engineers.

Initial setup was complex.

We have multiple data indexers, and each component is on a separate device. I think QRadar has many tools from the point of view of applications integrated within the SIEM solution, like threat intel or use case manager. In LogRhythm, I don't see this.

Maybe we haven't gotten so far in the implementation, but in QRadar I can feel it's easier from the initial setup. We have only these components placed on one site. We don't have another recovery site.

I didn't see the RFP, but I heard that it is more expensive than QRadar. I remember one customer implemented only one QRadar in two sites. It cost them $2 million, I think. Maybe LogRhythm is much higher.

QRadar is built around Red Hat, so it's more stable. I think LogRhythm is more complicated than QRadar.

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.

When you integrate a log source by default, you have to know what the customer needs or the process that is wanted, because we did the reconfiguration multiple times for log sources.

So, they have to also follow the MITRE ATT&CK Framework, because by default LogRhythm collects the common logs, so you have to enable this.

To estimate it in the licensing sizing exercise, it must be done correctly. Sometimes I see customers sizing away from the current situation. Customers sometimes buy a license that is not enough for their implementation, because they didn't expect what they would be adding in the future during the implementation.

Sometimes the implementation takes one year, and the customer adds more devices, so it exceeds their license. I think it's the presales' job to do the sizing correctly. And the customer must be aware of how or what to implement during, so that implementation doesn't take long.

It took some customers two years to implement a SIEM solution. I don't remember the solution, but it was a waste of two years' time.