Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XSIAM | 2.9% |
| Wazuh | 10.9% |
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 9.3% |
| Other | 76.9% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk Enterprise Security | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Cortex XSIAM vs Wazuh | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | Cortex XSIAM vs Microsoft Sentinel | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 4.3 | 4.3% | 97% | 135 interviewsAdd to research |
| Microsoft Sentinel | 4.1 | 6.4% | 93% | 98 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 359 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 243 |
| Large Enterprise | 1000 |
Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.
What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?
What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?
Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Associate Director at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 2.5 | I am evaluating Cortex XSIAM in my new organization, having used its older version before. The solution offers flexibility in manual workflows and effective ticketing. However, it lacks integrations and playbooks, hindering automation and incident response efficiency. ROI remains absent. |
| SOC Analyst at OVELOSEC | 4.0 | In our organization, we use Cortex XSIAM for SOC monitoring, onboarding devices, and integrating log parsers. While it's effective, improvements are needed in data onboarding and AI analytics. We previously used Splunk User Behavior Analytics before switching. |
| Solutions Architect at ostec | 4.5 | I've used Cortex XSIAM for two years and find its automation, integration, and behavior analytics valuable, though it's expensive and could improve vendor integration and identity management; overall, it's stable, scalable, and greatly enhances incident response efficiency. |
| Senior Vice President at Chi Networks | 4.0 | We use Cortex XSIAM for endpoint protection, applying policies, and automating processes through API integration. Its signature-less detection enhances security, though dashboard improvements are needed. Previously using ESET, we chose XSIAM for its automation and customization features. |
| Owner at a retailer with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | We partner and train users on Cortex XSIAM, valuing its AI for detecting vulnerabilities. While we appreciate its ease of setup and rule optimization, improvements in detection and resolution are desired. Compared to IBM QRadar, Cortex justifies its cost. |
| Team Lead, Security at seamlessinfotech.com | 4.0 | I've used Cortex XSIAM for four years and find it effective for incident correlation, automation, and reducing unnecessary alerts. While its interface could be more intuitive, deployment is smooth and the ROI is typically realized in a few months. |
| Senior Manager - Security Operations at First Advantage Corporation | 4.5 | In our organization, Cortex XSIAM serves as our primary SIEM solution, excelling in security orchestration, intelligence, and detection enrichment. We achieved over $500k ROI without expanding our team, unlike Sentinel or Splunk, which need more staffing. |
| Subject Matter Expert at Softcell Technologies Limited | 4.5 | I suggest Cortex XSIAM as a cost-effective alternative to CrowdStrike or Trend Micro, particularly since it offers competitive pricing in India. Customers appreciate its integration with existing Palo Alto solutions, though support speed could be improved. |
