Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ExtremeCloud IQ based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Aruba ClearPass, and Cisco DNA Center.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
ExtremeCloud IQ surpasses its competitors by offering intuitive network management, advanced automation, and AI-driven insights, enabling seamless scalability and enhanced security for superior operational efficiency and user experience.
Extreme Networks Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Extreme Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco Identity Services Engine provides detailed network access control suitable for complex environments. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers agile cloud management with analytics, ideal for distributed networks. Cisco excels in security and integration, while ExtremeCloud IQ is preferred for its user-friendly, cost-efficient cloud solution.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) typically involves higher initial setup costs compared to ExtremeCloud IQ, which offers a more straightforward and lower-cost setup. This difference highlights a key consideration for budget-conscious organizations choosing between the two platforms.
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) typically involves higher initial setup costs compared to ExtremeCloud IQ, which offers a more straightforward and lower-cost setup. This difference highlights a key consideration for budget-conscious organizations choosing between the two platforms.
Aruba ClearPass excels in network security and adaptable multi-vendor integration, appealing to organizations needing robust NAC and policy management. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers centralized management and streamlined operations, suiting businesses prioritizing ease of deployment and flexible cloud-based solutions.
Aruba ClearPass setup costs are higher but offer extensive security features, while ExtremeCloud IQ has a lower setup cost and is more budget-friendly.
Aruba ClearPass setup costs are higher but offer extensive security features, while ExtremeCloud IQ has a lower setup cost and is more budget-friendly.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers scalability with its cloud-based management, focusing on efficiency through advanced features. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center excels in integration within Cisco environments but requires enhancement for non-Cisco compatibility. ExtremeCloud IQ highlights cost-effectiveness, whereas Cisco DNA Center delivers substantial ROI for large networks.
ExtremeCloud IQ features a lower setup cost, providing a budget-friendly entry point, whereas Cisco DNA Center requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing advanced management capabilities.
ExtremeCloud IQ features a lower setup cost, providing a budget-friendly entry point, whereas Cisco DNA Center requires a higher initial investment, emphasizing advanced management capabilities.
Fortinet FortiNAC emphasizes security through user authentication and compliance, ideal for stringent security requirements. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ focuses on robust cloud management, offering automated configurations and real-time analytics, suitable for diverse network environments seeking simplified operations.
DX Spectrum offers detailed network monitoring and integration for large enterprises needing root-cause analysis, despite complex configuration. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ provides centralized cloud management with intuitive dashboards, though it requires improved reporting features and enhanced roaming capabilities for network efficiency.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers robust scalability and ease of deployment through a controller-less architecture and cloud management. In comparison, ThreatLocker excels in security with its proactive zero-trust approach, providing enhanced application control and allow-listing, which might interest a security-focused tech buyer.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a budget-friendly setup cost, whereas ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform may require a larger initial investment. Each solution presents distinct pricing considerations.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a budget-friendly setup cost, whereas ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform may require a larger initial investment. Each solution presents distinct pricing considerations.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers centralized cloud management with robust security, while Fortinet FortiManager excels in automation and security policy management. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ provides flexible deployment models, whereas FortiManager emphasizes on-premises options. ExtremeCloud IQ is cost-effective, contrasting with FortiManager's scalability in large environments.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Fortinet FortiManager requires a more complex and expensive installation process, highlighting clear distinctions in initial investment between the two solutions.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Fortinet FortiManager requires a more complex and expensive installation process, highlighting clear distinctions in initial investment between the two solutions.
ExtremeCloud IQ is ideal for seamless wireless network management with its controller-less infrastructure and cloud-based tools. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM offers robust policy management for secure applications. Each product addresses distinct networking needs.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, which requires a more significant initial investment. While both solutions have unique strengths, the cost difference might influence budgeting decisions.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, which requires a more significant initial investment. While both solutions have unique strengths, the cost difference might influence budgeting decisions.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers scalability with cloud management and streamlined support, appealing for those needing flexible deployments. In comparison, Trend Micro TippingPoint, focusing on strong security features, suits buyers prioritizing robust intrusion prevention and quick threat responses in enterprise settings.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly choice, whereas Trend Micro TippingPoint incurs higher initial expenses due to its advanced threat protection features.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly choice, whereas Trend Micro TippingPoint incurs higher initial expenses due to its advanced threat protection features.
Splunk User Behavior Analytics focuses on advanced security protocols, ideal for identifying suspicious activities through data analytics. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ streamlines cloud network management with AI-driven insights, perfect for enhancing network efficiency and adaptability, catering to diverse cloud integration needs.
Portnox excels in network visibility and operational efficiency with strong security features. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers AI-driven analytics and zero trust policy enforcement for seamless connectivity. Portnox suits users needing self-sufficient systems, while ExtremeCloud IQ appeals to those requiring centralized management.
Cisco IOS Security excels with robust features like AAA and VPN, ideal for complex networks. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers centralized management and intuitive cloud operations. Cisco is preferred for security, while ExtremeCloud IQ is favored for ease of management and analytics.
Cisco IOS Security has a higher setup cost, while ExtremeCloud IQ offers a more cost-effective option with a simpler configuration process. The two solutions differ significantly in terms of initial investment and ease of setup.
Cisco IOS Security has a higher setup cost, while ExtremeCloud IQ offers a more cost-effective option with a simpler configuration process. The two solutions differ significantly in terms of initial investment and ease of setup.
OpenText Network Node Manager is preferred for its ease of use and customer support. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers advanced features for comprehensive network management. OpenText's cost-effectiveness contrasts with ExtremeCloud's higher upfront investment but promises long-term savings through feature-rich scalability.
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT excels in intrusion detection and real-time traffic analysis, appealing to those requiring robust network security. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers advanced cloud management and AI-driven analytics, attracting buyers needing easy deployment and scalable cloud-based network management.
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT's setup cost tends to be higher compared to ExtremeCloud IQ, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. The pricing difference reflects their focus and feature set, catering to varied organizational requirements.
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT's setup cost tends to be higher compared to ExtremeCloud IQ, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. The pricing difference reflects their focus and feature set, catering to varied organizational requirements.
ExtremeCloud IQ ensures agile deployment and cost-effectiveness, appealing to organizations seeking quick scalability. In comparison, Cisco Catalyst Center, with its robust feature set and comprehensive ecosystem, attracts those needing full-scale solutions and extensive integration capabilities despite higher initial costs.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, making it accessible for businesses with tighter budgets, while Cisco Catalyst Center presents a more robust setup process with potentially higher setup expenses, appealing to larger organizations seeking advanced ...
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, making it accessible for businesses with tighter budgets, while Cisco Catalyst Center presents a more robust setup process with potentially higher setup expenses, appealing to larger organizations seeking advanced ...
ExtremeCloud IQ excels in scalability and AI-driven features, making it ideal for modern cloud-based solutions. In comparison, HPE Intelligent Management Center offers extensive multi-vendor integration, supporting diverse equipment for comprehensive network management, appealing to businesses needing robust on-premise infrastructure with seamless system integration.
ExtremeCloud IQ has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while HPE Intelligent Management Center may involve a more complex setup process that could increase initial expenditures.
ExtremeCloud IQ has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while HPE Intelligent Management Center may involve a more complex setup process that could increase initial expenditures.
Sophos Network Access Control focuses on robust network security, including access control and compliance enforcement. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers a cloud-based model with advanced management and automation. A tech buyer might choose Sophos for security needs or ExtremeCloud for scalability and centralized management.
Sophos Network Access Control offers a straightforward setup process with clear pricing, while ExtremeCloud IQ provides a cost-effective and easy deployment with flexible pricing options, highlighting a difference in initial setup approaches.
Sophos Network Access Control offers a straightforward setup process with clear pricing, while ExtremeCloud IQ provides a cost-effective and easy deployment with flexible pricing options, highlighting a difference in initial setup approaches.
IBM Tivoli NetCool offers strong real-time performance monitoring and incident management for robust networks. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ provides advanced AI insights for enhanced automation. IBM Tivoli involves on-premises setup, while ExtremeCloud's cloud deployment ensures quicker ROI with flexible pricing.
IBM Tivoli NetCool involves higher setup costs, reflecting its robust architecture, whereas ExtremeCloud IQ offers a more economical setup, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
IBM Tivoli NetCool involves higher setup costs, reflecting its robust architecture, whereas ExtremeCloud IQ offers a more economical setup, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
ExtremeCloud IQ excels in flexible scalability and extensive integration, ideal for complex environments with varied network needs. In comparison, Juniper Mist Wired Assurance offers advanced AI-driven insights and automation, enhancing network optimization for those seeking deep visibility and automation in management.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers ease of use and broad firmware compatibility. In comparison, macmon Network Access Control provides robust security features and advanced access controls. ExtremeCloud IQ simplifies deployment and management, while macmon's comprehensive security and proactive support appeal to security-conscious tech buyers.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a straightforward setup cost, while macmon Network Access Control requires a more customized setup investment. This difference in setup approach highlights varied initial financial commitments between the two network management solutions.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a straightforward setup cost, while macmon Network Access Control requires a more customized setup investment. This difference in setup approach highlights varied initial financial commitments between the two network management solutions.
Tripwire Enterprise excels in vulnerability management appealing to security-focused buyers. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers robust real-time analytics. Tripwire Enterprise has higher upfront costs, providing longer-term ROI, while ExtremeCloud IQ ensures faster ROI with its cloud-centric deployment and flexible pricing structure.
ExtremeCloud IQ provides centralized management with ease of deployment across various cloud models, ensuring scalability and robust security. In comparison, Ruckus Cloudpath emphasizes strong security with user-based licensing suitable for secure connections, appealing to those needing CA certification and device policy enforcement.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, making it budget-friendly, while Ruckus Cloudpath requires higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities and feature set.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, making it budget-friendly, while Ruckus Cloudpath requires higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities and feature set.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers ease of use with its cloud-driven management and AI insights. In comparison, Ivanti NAC prioritizes robust security features. ExtremeCloud IQ appeals to those seeking scalable solutions, while Ivanti NAC targets organizations needing advanced security for long-term ROI.
ExtremeCloud IQ setup cost is seen as manageable, while Ivanti NAC requires a higher initial investment. Ivanti NAC users mention complexity in setup, contrasting with ExtremeCloud IQ's straightforward installation process.
ExtremeCloud IQ setup cost is seen as manageable, while Ivanti NAC requires a higher initial investment. Ivanti NAC users mention complexity in setup, contrasting with ExtremeCloud IQ's straightforward installation process.
IBM Security Network IPS excels in threat detection and management, offering significant initial protection benefits. In comparison, ExtremeCloud IQ offers advanced cloud-driven insights, ensuring easier scalability. Tech buyers might prefer ExtremeCloud IQ for its adaptability or IBM Security Network IPS for security depth.
ExtremeCloud IQ’s flexible cloud-based architecture offers scalability, ease of management, and IoT integration, ideal for growing organizations. In comparison, Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista provides robust wired and wireless management through a consolidated interface, appealing to businesses with specific branded equipment needs.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista, providing a cost-effective solution for those prioritizing budget. In contrast, Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista may require a higher upfront investment, reflecting its extensive feature set.
ExtremeCloud IQ offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista, providing a cost-effective solution for those prioritizing budget. In contrast, Alcatel-Lucent OmniVista may require a higher upfront investment, reflecting its extensive feature set.
EMCO Remote Shutdown efficiently handles automated PC shutdowns and remote management, offering valuable features like scheduled operations and multi-session control. While it enhances IT workflows, users suggest room for improvement in performance optimization and expanding integration with other systems, ensuring better compatibility.
