Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention comparison

Extreme and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Extreme is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. Extreme holds a 0.6% mindshare in ID, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Extreme users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
ExtremeCloud IQ
Read 76 ExtremeCloud IQ reviews
  • 117 Views
  • 81 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Read 27 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews
  • 2,813 Views
  • 1,841 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

ExtremeCloud IQ and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention are prominent contenders in the network management and security industry. ExtremeCloud IQ is recognized for its scalability, ease of deployment, and centralized management, making it appealing for various deployment sizes. Palo Alto Networks is preferred for its comprehensive threat detection capabilities and robust security features, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing advanced security measures.

Features: ExtremeCloud IQ includes controller-less access points, integrated tools for security and troubleshooting, and centralized management. It is designed to be scalable and effective across both public and hybrid clouds. Palo Alto offers anti-malware protection, vulnerability management, and advanced threat prevention capabilities with a focus on strong performance in security operations, providing reliable defense against potential threats.

Room for Improvement: Customers suggest ExtremeCloud IQ could benefit from a simplified initial configuration process and more intuitive interfaces. AP power improvements and consistent support documentation are also highlighted. Palo Alto users express a need for better email filtering capabilities, suggest pricing adjustments, and request enhanced documentation alongside more accessible support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeCloud IQ is commended for its straightforward deployment and accessibility in cloud management, ensuring efficient setup in public and hybrid environments. It provides highly responsive customer service that users find supportive and easily reachable. Palo Alto, though primarily on-premises, is celebrated for robust security features. Its customer service is rated high in quality, though navigating technical support tiers can be challenging.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeCloud IQ is perceived as offering good value with low operational costs and a fast return on investment due to its easy deployment and management structure. Palo Alto Networks is considered costly but offers competitive pricing in relation to its high-quality security features. The upfront investment might be higher, but it holds potential for significant ROI for organizations that require advanced threat prevention capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ExtremeCloud IQ vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ExtremeCloud IQ vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ExtremeCloud IQ
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
18th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (10th), Network Access Control (NAC) (10th)
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of ExtremeCloud IQ is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 7.4%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Sriman L - PeerSpot reviewer
One of the best cloud-based wireless solutions that helps manage multiple APs from a single dashboard across multiple locations
ExtremeCloud IQ’s user interface needs to be improved, and its current bugs need to be fixed. Sometimes, AP details, like the AP firmware and the AP hostname, are not updating properly because of a few bugs in the current version, which they might fix in the next version. Compared to the central and other cloud solutions, a couple of bugs still running on these portals need to be rectified. For ExtremeCloud IQ's next releases, I expect to get all the users and the events alerts. Also, if any AP goes down, I should be able to do some scheduled reports specific to the site because it is currently in beta. If any AP goes offline, that's an event. If you want to do the filter for a specific site event, we don't have that filter option. I expect specific site-level and category-level events and alert filters to get reports.
Read full review
Carlos Bracamonte - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust, reliable, simple to install and good technical support
We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection. I'm not sure what the remaining threat protection features are off the top of my head. But beyond that, we use URL filtering. We have three approved cases for using external dynamic lists that are stored in a bucket repository. Then, for each URL site that needs to be whitelisted, we add it to the external dynamic list in order to gain access to this email. I would like Wildfire to be implemented. We use the equivalent in Cisco is the integration policies. We have the Wildfire but we are not currently implementing it. We don't have the license to use it, but we are not currently implementing it until we present the use cases that the company gives some value to and they approve the use of it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The support organization behind this product is extremely professional."
"Its configuration and deployment are the most valuable."
"I like ExtremeCloud IQ's unified single-pane-of-glass dashboard. It offers a lot of visibility of performance, and it's great for troubleshooting. You don't have to go to 55 different places. You can get the information you need with just a few clicks."
"Our transaction polling is now way more secure."
"The cloud management gives us the tools and reports that we need to monitor and troubleshoot the network."
"This solution's most valuable feature is its short deployment time."
"The feature that I like to most is unified management in a multitenant environment, where we can manage all our customers with thousands of devices (routers, switches, VPNs, and APs)."
"ExtremeCloud IQ is an intuitive platform. The tool's ability to streamline network operations depends on the end customer. Sometimes it's quicker, and sometimes it takes much longer. It helps me to address network problems."
More ExtremeCloud IQ pros
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the market leader as far as security gateways and endpoint protection. Additionally, the threat database that is used is one of the best."
"It's a monster, it's got so many beautiful features. We do deal with other firewalls and we've got a better idea of what other firewalls' capabilities are, any comparison with the Palo Alto I liked the quality of service on the applications that you can control the amount of bandwidth an application is allowed to consume. The best feature is the quality of the application quality of service."
"With the IP address flag, I was able to see that I was being hacked. The moment there was an interaction between somebody on my network and that IP, the solution was able to flag it, and we were able to protect ourselves."
"Most of the features of Palo Alto Threat Prevention are alright. I recommend features like content filtering, IP address, & intelligent firewalls. The reporting feature is very good."
"We are currently using the URL filtering feature, which is the most popular."
"One of the most valuable features is the anti-malware protection."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Threat Prevention for our company is the next generation firewall."
"The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros
 

Cons

"The managing of switches within this solution could be improved."
"Having a wizard for customers who are just starting might be helpful."
"There can be an improvement by incorporating two-factor authentication or multi-factor authentication for security. Advanced network access control features and application control features should be added to manage applications. Many customers are interested in managing data, such as setting data quotas for individual users."
"An area for improvement in ExtremeCloud IQ is its technical support. Support could be better, especially when you need help concerning ExtremeCloud IQ and WinG."
"The solution will show us that there are some issues, but when we try to find those issues, we can't see them."
"I would like to see a remote phone application for monitoring APs when on the road."
"Their firewall configuration gets funky and it can be difficult to understand."
"A room for improvement in ExtremeCloud IQ is roaming. My team is facing roaming issues with the solution, particularly when using VoIP over WiFi. For example, VoIP sometimes breaks when you walk around the customer site. In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release of the solution, right now, the inventory for ExtremeCloud IQ is awful. There's no stock, and you must wait a year and a half for new stocks. It's awful."
More ExtremeCloud IQ cons
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive."
"The solution needs to improve its local technical support services. There is no premium support offered in our market."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve the commercial offing. Other solutions, such as Fortinet provide better commercial features."
"The organization mail security solutions could be improved. There is no mail security solution available."
"The behavioral detection capabilities could be expanded to address all threats at the perimeter, reducing the reliance on endpoint detection and response systems."
"Right now we are focusing on email. If Palo Alto can increase the features related to email filtering and the new malware, it would help us protect our systems."
"The installation was complicated."
"We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price was okay."
"It is not the cheapest product but I think that the price is reasonable because you get a lot of support of it's needed."
"The pricing is so cost-effective that it leaves no room for competition with other vendors."
"I am not involved in the price, but I am sure that it is not cheap."
"Extreme is twice as cheap compared to Cisco due to the currency exchange. Normally, I think Cisco would be a little bit more expensive, but there wouldn't be that much of a difference."
"For example, if you compare Aruba vs Aerohive, you need to check which licences from Aruba you need to match the functionality of Aerohive (usually you need at least three types of licences and a controller with redundancy). The same goes with Cisco, where you need buy additional licences for central management, firewall, spectral analysis, WIPS, PPSK, etc. Aerohive has a very simple model - one licence for all the functionalities - and you can believe that there are many. One licence makes it easy to maintain, scale, renew and you can plan your costs 10 years in advance."
"Customers need to pay a yearly licensing fee for ExtremeCloud IQ, which is a little bit expensive."
"It is costly as compared to Meraki, Aruba, Juniper, and Cisco. Cloud IQ is an enterprise solution, whereas Meraki is specifically a single solution."
More ExtremeCloud IQ pricing and cost advice
"The pricing could be lower."
"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."
"There is an initial, expensive investment but the return is good."
"It's not too expensive."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
"The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."
"It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price."
"The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Educational Organization
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...
See all answers
What do you like most about ExtremeCloud IQ?
The Client 360 feature provides a comprehensive view of your clients and their activities, including the devices they use. Additionally, a feature called Network 360 offers a 360-degree view of the...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ExtremeCloud IQ?
The licensing was a challenge due to budget constraints, and I used ExtremeCloud IQ without a license for a period. The documentation and training courses were also costly, impacting how easily I c...
See all answers
Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
It is a stable product.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
The pricing is competitive, and with current campaigns and discounts, it provides an excellent device for a reasonable price.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs ExtremeCloud IQ Logo
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs ExtremeCloud IQ
Compared 15% of the time
Ubiquiti Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ Logo
Ubiquiti Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ
Compared 11% of the time
Ruckus Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ Logo
Ruckus Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ
Compared 11% of the time
Cisco DNA Center vs ExtremeCloud IQ Logo
Cisco DNA Center vs ExtremeCloud IQ
Compared 10% of the time
Aruba Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ Logo
Aruba Wireless vs ExtremeCloud IQ
Compared 7% of the time
More ExtremeCloud IQ Competitors
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 17% of the time
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 13% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 11% of the time
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 11% of the time
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 10% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ExtremeCloud IQ
April 2025
ExtremeCloud IQ reportDownload ExtremeCloud IQ product report
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
April 2025
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reportDownload Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report
 

Also Known As

Aerohive Networks, Aerohive HiveManager, HiveManager, ExtremeCloud , ExtremeSecurity
No data available
 

Overview

ExtremeCloud is a resilient and scalable cloud-based network management solution offered by Extreme Networks as a subscription service.

The network is your platform of engagement for clients and staff. We have designed ExtremeCloud to provide superior user experience by empowering you and the applications that drive your business. The combination of Extreme Networks’ smart wired and wireless edges and the elasticity, resilience and scalability provided via state-of-the-art datacenters distributed strategically for worldwide availability allows you to respond to the changing needs of your business, at the speed of cloud, through a simple, multi-site aware user interface.

Extreme

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Henry Ford Health System, Baltimore Ravens, Brandili, Federal University of Alagoas, CEDAE, Caxias do Sul, UNISC Concurrency, CenturyLink Field, Louisiana College, Cricket Tasmania Stadium, Moscow Internet Exchange
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Buyer's Guide
ExtremeCloud IQ vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
April 2025
Free Report: ExtremeCloud IQ vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Find out what your peers are saying about ExtremeCloud IQ vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ExtremeCloud IQ vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.