


Citrix Endpoint Management and Sophos Mobile are competitive solutions in the mobile device management arena. Customers often favor Sophos Mobile for its comprehensive features, which are considered worth the investment, while Citrix is preferred for its robust security capabilities.
Features: Citrix Endpoint Management integrates with Citrix Workspace, facilitating seamless access to virtual applications and desktops, prioritizing security with a focus on secure application delivery and flexible application management. Sophos Mobile offers a broad range of features, including advanced threat protection, application management, and data protection. Additionally, it provides centralized management and comprehensive support for various device types.
Room for Improvement: Citrix Endpoint Management could enhance user experience by further simplifying its interface and improving technical support response times. Cost optimization is another area of potential improvement for Citrix. Sophos Mobile can improve in areas such as integration complexity for non-Sophos environments and further enhancing documentation and training resources. Users also suggest simplifying policy management features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix Endpoint Management excels in integrating with existing Citrix environments, providing efficient deployment processes. Customers appreciate the seamless management capabilities offered to organizations using Citrix technologies. Sophos Mobile is noted for its straightforward deployment, detailed guidance, and responsive customer service, often delivering a speedier setup and superior technical assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Citrix Endpoint Management has higher upfront costs, but its ROI aligns well with its security offerings and integration benefits. Sophos Mobile is seen as a more cost-effective option with significant ROI due to its comprehensive protective features. It balances lower setup costs with high security and functionality returns, often viewed as the more economical choice.
Everything we've gained from it makes my job easier day after day, and I see value in it as an engineer.
Microsoft Intune not only saves costs by reducing the number of personnel needed but also offers a comprehensive solution for managing laptops, applications, security, individual access, and enrollment.
Importantly, when someone leaves the company, it helps protect document access on their devices.
After implementing Citrix Endpoint Management, there is a return on investment for my customers because we provide three services: first is the license, where we got margin; second, deployment service, which typically has two types—one where Citrix will do the deployment and the other where a partner should do it, and we deploy this solution for about 80% of the customers in India; third is after deployment support.
When a support ticket is submitted, it directly reaches someone with Intune support expertise.
When I contacted Microsoft, they had the same expertise, if not more, which is phenomenal because I felt heard and my problem was solved.
Sometimes, the support provided is excellent, and the representative is knowledgeable, while other times, the service needs improvement.
Technical support for Citrix Endpoint Management is not satisfactory.
This product requires some mature understanding, so sometimes they can handle small problems, but for major or architecture-related issues, their L3 or our L3 engineer helps them understand the problem.
The support from Citrix has been satisfactory.
In terms of responsiveness, they handle the calls immediately and efficiently.
The technical support for Sophos Mobile requires improvement.
The scalability of Microsoft Intune is ten out of ten.
Ideally, we want to automatically segregate devices based on user properties like primary use, but currently, dynamic groups seem limited to device properties.
It supports organizations with 200 endpoints and those with more than 15,000 endpoints.
My colleagues using iOS have faced issues, such as logging problems requiring frequent password entries.
We recommend it for both small and medium-sized enterprises.
It could scale better to meet diverse client needs.
At an enterprise level with more requirements, there is room for improvement.
We have not experienced downtime, bugs, or glitches.
It appears Microsoft Intune undergoes changes without informing customers.
Microsoft Intune has been very stable.
The solution's stability is below expectations.
The solution is stable, though there are occasional restarts, which are not critical.
Sophos is stable, and the product works well.
I would rate the stability of Sophos Mobile as a seven out of ten.
Features like unlocking devices sometimes fail, and the support offered for other operating systems is insufficient.
There are communication issues, so you might start working with a feature without knowing if it will be deprecated six months from now.
Many third-party companies offer single-pane-of-glass reporting that shows you what your update environment looks like, how your patch is doing, application status, etc., but Intune's reporting is not intuitive.
The main issue is the change from perpetual licenses to subscription-based ones, which has increased our costs significantly.
With AI being present, they may increase some AI-related features in the future.
The units are not updating the operating system as specified in the policy.
It would be beneficial to have the VPN feature incorporated into Sophos Mobile, even if it requires separate payment.
I also believe the portal itself requires improvements because the interface can be difficult to understand sometimes.
Regarding functionality, I think an area Sophos Mobile can actually improve is by infusing more AI-integrated services and solutions into the product.
Introductory professional services, like a fast-track service, were included with our E5 membership, and there have been no additional costs.
The Intune suite and add-ons, such as batch management and remote help, are costly.
It costs approximately forty euros per user per month.
The switch to subscription-based licensing has made it much more expensive.
For this client, the solution has been quite cheap.
The setup cost pricing for Citrix Endpoint Management varies; I can say $3,000 per user license for setup.
The product is affordable, and there is no issue with its purchase for small companies.
In terms of pricing, Sophos Mobile is favorable compared to other mobile device security solutions.
The pricing of Sophos Mobile is high compared to the market, specifically 40% higher.
Intune excels in configuration and compliance management for Windows 10, ensuring devices receive timely updates and adhere to organizational standards.
Dynamic groups allow us to set conditions for automatic membership, eliminating the need for user intervention or manual review and ensuring a seamless workflow.
Windows Autopatch is the most valuable because it removes the burden of patch management.
We have found the ability to manage user accounts on shared devices valuable as it reduces the need for multiple licenses, which saves costs.
The change to a subscription-based model has removed the financial benefit we previously had.
Sophos Mobile has been rated nine out of ten for security and performance.
The features that stand out for maintaining mobile security are compliance and the ability to install applications and configure work profiles.
Sophos Mobile provides fantastic management and control along with web application control capabilities on mobile, features that would usually be on a firewall at the perimeter of the business or the organization.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Intune | 28.2% |
| Sophos Mobile | 2.5% |
| Citrix Endpoint Management | 2.0% |
| Other | 67.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 121 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 47 |
| Large Enterprise | 154 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Microsoft Intune provides centralized management of mobile devices and applications, ensuring security, compliance, and productivity through integration with Microsoft services like Microsoft 365 and Azure Active Directory.
Organizations use Intune for managing mobile devices and applications, enhancing security and compliance across platforms. With features like single sign-on, conditional access, and zero-touch deployment via Autopilot, it facilitates efficient operations. Intune's scalability, easy enrollment, and capabilities such as remote wipe support diverse device management, offering robust data protection and efficient operation. Despite its features, improvement areas include reporting, compatibility with non-Microsoft devices, and better support for macOS and Linux devices.
What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
In industries such as finance, healthcare, and education, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure secure and compliant device management. Companies leverage its capabilities to deploy security policies and manage both corporate-owned and BYOD environments, facilitating a unified approach to data protection and compliance.
XenMobile is a comprehensive solution to manage mobile apps, data and devices, available both on-premises and in the cloud. Users have single-click access to all of their apps from a unified corporate app store and IT can easily configure, secure and support mobile devices. With XenMobile technology, IT can meet their compliance and control needs while giving users the freedom to experience work and life their way.
Sophos Mobile is a Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) and security solution that helps businesses spend less time and effort to manage and secure traditional and mobile endpoints. The only UEM solution that integrates natively with a leading next-gen endpoint security platform, Sophos Mobile supports management of Windows 10, macOS, iOS, and Android devices.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.