The product is free of charge and comes integrated into Windows.
The solution is free.
The product is free of charge and comes integrated into Windows.
The solution is free.
The licensing cost is a bit prohibitive.
Licensing is easy.
The licensing cost is a bit prohibitive.
Licensing is easy.
It comes with a Microsoft subscription which the customer has, so they don't have to invest somewhere else.
The licensing requirements are not very clear from the outset.
It comes with a Microsoft subscription which the customer has, so they don't have to invest somewhere else.
The licensing requirements are not very clear from the outset.
Actually the solution is very expensive. I don't know the particulars since the purchasing team dealt with it.
The pricing for this solution is on the higher end.
Actually the solution is very expensive. I don't know the particulars since the purchasing team dealt with it.
The pricing for this solution is on the higher end.
Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing.
The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.
Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing.
The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.
You should take out a dedicated license agreement of your MDM fleet and invest heavily in innovating in this space.
I have no opinion about the pricing of the product.
You should take out a dedicated license agreement of your MDM fleet and invest heavily in innovating in this space.
I have no opinion about the pricing of the product.
The cost is high, but it still works well.
We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat.
The cost is high, but it still works well.
We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat.
The pricing is much more manageable versus other products.
The price of Tenable Nessus is much more competitive versus other solutions on the market.
The pricing is much more manageable versus other products.
The price of Tenable Nessus is much more competitive versus other solutions on the market.
Usually every implementation is different and the quote is in function of number of assets.
When you want to cover yourself for scalability, you will be charged for the number you place on the scan itself.
Usually every implementation is different and the quote is in function of number of assets.
When you want to cover yourself for scalability, you will be charged for the number you place on the scan itself.
The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive.
Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features.
The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive, but it's not the most competitive.
Some people find the tier licensing system complicated, but it offers a lot of value for money if we use the features.
We have an educational licensing agreement. It's a customer agreement for multiple years.
This product is not expensive.
We have an educational licensing agreement. It's a customer agreement for multiple years.
This product is not expensive.
Licensing and pricing are extremely straightforward.
Cost is important. I switched because Aruba's costs were well below Cisco's.
Licensing and pricing are extremely straightforward.
Cost is important. I switched because Aruba's costs were well below Cisco's.
It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it.
I am not involved in the pricing or licensing, so I can't speak to that.
It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it.
I am not involved in the pricing or licensing, so I can't speak to that.
I think it pays for itself to let Jamf host the server.
The setup cost is in the training, which is the most important step of your journey.
I think it pays for itself to let Jamf host the server.
The setup cost is in the training, which is the most important step of your journey.
The price of the solution is less than the competitors.
I do not have experience with the pricing of the solution.
The price of the solution is less than the competitors.
I do not have experience with the pricing of the solution.
The solutions price is fair for what they offer.
The price of the solution is high compared to others and we have lost some customers because of it.
The solutions price is fair for what they offer.
The price of the solution is high compared to others and we have lost some customers because of it.
When purchasing, buying with other IBM tools provided us with a very good discount in pricing.
I can estimate the reduced cost of servers maintenance to approximatively $500,000.
When purchasing, buying with other IBM tools provided us with a very good discount in pricing.
I can estimate the reduced cost of servers maintenance to approximatively $500,000.
The licensing is very easy to understand and pricing is right for what you get.
Per desktop cost is somewhere around $50 or $100.
The licensing is very easy to understand and pricing is right for what you get.
Per desktop cost is somewhere around $50 or $100.
We probably spend about $50,000 a year on licensing.
Licensing fees are on a yearly basis.
We probably spend about $50,000 a year on licensing.
Licensing fees are on a yearly basis.
Devices with multiple IP's count multiple times against your license count.
The ROI is priceless.
Devices with multiple IP's count multiple times against your license count.
The ROI is priceless.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product.
The product has the best price-to-performance ratio.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product.
The product has the best price-to-performance ratio.
The solution that we were using costs less, but it didn't offer as much as Soti. It's comparable if you look at it over the five-year term.
SOTI's pricing seems to be competitive.
The solution that we were using costs less, but it didn't offer as much as Soti. It's comparable if you look at it over the five-year term.
SOTI's pricing seems to be competitive.
It requires zero investment in infrastructure since it is 100% cloud.
Fees are monthly and it's approximately $8 per user.
It requires zero investment in infrastructure since it is 100% cloud.
Fees are monthly and it's approximately $8 per user.
The cost of the product is high, but worth it because of the utility and great product support.
The price of Pulse Connect Secure is expensive.
The cost of the product is high, but worth it because of the utility and great product support.
The price of Pulse Connect Secure is expensive.
The price is high for the market.
It's extremely competitive and very good for a product in this sphere.
The price is high for the market.
It's extremely competitive and very good for a product in this sphere.
It may be more expensive, but you get what you pay for.
The pricing and licensing are good. It's worth it.
It may be more expensive, but you get what you pay for.
The pricing and licensing are good. It's worth it.
My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive.
The price of MobileIron UEM is very good.
My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive.
The price of MobileIron UEM is very good.
Defender for Business is included by default with an Office 365 premium subscription.
Defender for Business is included by default with an Office 365 premium subscription.
The setup for Terraform is quite easy and currently, we are using their community version along with Jenkins.
They have given it to us at a monthly cost, but it is on a yearly basis.
The setup for Terraform is quite easy and currently, we are using their community version along with Jenkins.
They have given it to us at a monthly cost, but it is on a yearly basis.
We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use.
The product is a great value.
We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use.
The product is a great value.
The licensing is paid on a yearly basis.
Sophos Mobile is inexpensive.
The licensing is paid on a yearly basis.
Sophos Mobile is inexpensive.
We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market.
There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed.
We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market.
There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed.
Depending on which plan you purchase, there are a plethora of applications available to you.
Compared to buying a license, it is much cheaper and a good buy.
Depending on which plan you purchase, there are a plethora of applications available to you.
Compared to buying a license, it is much cheaper and a good buy.
I would rate pricing at eight out of ten. It is a bit higher because of the security features that Microsoft provides.
The solution is cost-effective.
I would rate pricing at eight out of ten. It is a bit higher because of the security features that Microsoft provides.
The solution is cost-effective.
With the new licensing model, there seems to be a significant increase in cost, which makes it difficult to push forward and talk with the business.
Sometimes, it is very hard to get an overview because there are so many different suites to find out what is the right thing for new customers.
With the new licensing model, there seems to be a significant increase in cost, which makes it difficult to push forward and talk with the business.
Sometimes, it is very hard to get an overview because there are so many different suites to find out what is the right thing for new customers.
The solution is low cost.
To use BMC Client Management they charge annually per node.
The solution is low cost.
To use BMC Client Management they charge annually per node.
I am satisfied with the price of this solution.
Their pricing structure is very good against the competition. Pricing is definitely not a challenge here.
I am satisfied with the price of this solution.
Their pricing structure is very good against the competition. Pricing is definitely not a challenge here.
The price of the solution is competitive.
The price of the solution is competitive.
It's relatively inexpensive.
The solution's price is reasonable.
It's relatively inexpensive.
The solution's price is reasonable.
It is expensive. Its price could be cheaper.
Although the solution is a bit costly in my opinion, for customers who really need this solution, Ivanti Avalanche is worth it.
It is expensive. Its price could be cheaper.
Although the solution is a bit costly in my opinion, for customers who really need this solution, Ivanti Avalanche is worth it.
Matrix42 is more affordable than Ivanti.
Matrix42 is more affordable than Ivanti.
