Catchpoint vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE comparison

Catchpoint and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Catchpoint is ranked #62 with an average rating of 8.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.7. Catchpoint holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,967 Views
826 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Read 51 NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reviews

3,630 Views
2,650 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Catchpoint compete in the network monitoring and performance analysis category. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE seems to have the upper hand in comprehensive network traffic analysis, while Catchpoint excels in synthetic monitoring and user experience evaluation.

Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers packet inspection, NetFlow analysis, and application-specific traffic monitoring. It also provides voice call diagnostics and the ability to correlate different traffic types. Catchpoint is strong in synthetic monitoring with transaction monitors and API/UI monitoring. It excels in drill-down capabilities and visualization features, which give a clear picture of transaction and performance metrics.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE could improve its user interface for easier management and reduce complexity in module integration. There's also a need to decrease dependency on physical agents. Catchpoint's user interface may result in window proliferation and requires more automation for performance analysis. It also needs better API capabilities and efficiency in parameter adjustments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments and offers dedicated on-site engineers for enhanced customer service, which might increase costs. Catchpoint provides flexibility with public cloud deployments, and support is considered solid, possibly relying on self-service for custom configurations.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is associated with high costs and requires full utilization for value. The tool's strength is its versatile feature set and robust support at a premium price. Catchpoint's consumption-based pricing can be expensive and is tied to points, demanding careful consideration of cost versus service level. Users find ROI in reduced troubleshooting time and enhanced visibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

62nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (38th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th)

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE	1.2%
Catchpoint	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

Read full review

EdwardShim

General Manager at MOCOMSYS

Offers detailed network monitoring but requires improvement in deployment complexity and pricing

The price is really high, making it difficult for many financial companies to purchase immediately; it will take time for them to afford any budget for the purchase. The traffic data correlation feature's effectiveness with performance issues for clients remains uncertain as there are questions that need to be addressed through engineers regarding how many customers are actually using it. Regarding pricing and value for money, while the solution has the potential to save time and money for clients in the long term, monitoring solutions for performance management or network monitoring do not cause immediate damage to a company. It could lead to damage over time, but financial and management teams typically cannot see the immediate crisis. This is why many big companies Samsung and Hyundai try to build their own monitoring solutions using open-source tools and their own engineers, though it has not been successful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"The best feature in Catchpoint is the alert or the notification my company gets frequently, in particular, every five minutes. It's the notification you get whenever a respective market has an issue. There's also a dashboard in Catchpoint that shows the markets you support, so all the markets will be highlighted graphically in the dashboard whenever there's downtime that could affect you. If there's no issue for a specific market, it will be in green, so in this way, anybody would be able to understand which market has issues and which market has no issues through Catchpoint. The tool is very useful for monitoring activities."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

More Catchpoint pros

"If a lot of traffic from one site is hitting AWS Cloud or the data center, then we want to know which client is utilizing the most bandwidth. We will work with nGeniusONE to troubleshoot the issue."

"The visual and graphical interfaces in the display that it provides for us to show our senior leadership. We can show them what is actually happening, instead of a spreadsheet."

"Network faults are easily and quickly identified through dashboards and drill down."

"The VoLTE model, call search and Media Monitor were essential when we launched VoLTE. We're relying heavily on them to troubleshoot our VoLTE calls."

"The product is very good. We have very few problems."

"When we have any type of outage, and we dig into it, we are able to tell what the root cause is instead of having to go through Wireshark, etc."

"The best feature is when we have it connected permanently via TAPs. That enables us to constantly collect data and then we can go back in time... To be able to rewind, back in time, and see the problem as it happened, is very helpful."

"The ability to be able to do detailed traffic analysis such as top-talkers, application-specific monitoring, and understanding them through patterns, is helpful. We're also able to gain an understanding of voice calls, voice traffic, whether we have packet loss in a certain part of the network or jitter or high latency that might be impacting the network. All of those are nice functionalities."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pros

Cons

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"The product could include global monitoring and predictive analytics to identify widespread issues and cyber threats."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"A large selection of nodes are available but it is a challenge to test reliably in China and the Middle East."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."

More Catchpoint cons

"We would like better end-to-end data flows. This is something that my users always complain about, as they don't know what the data flows are on the network. We would like to know every point along the line."

"This is a typical thing, but every time they do a major code upgrade, we get hit with some nasty bugs. Some of them literally stop the whole platform from collecting traffic data. They should really do more Q&A on the software stability before release."

"Datadog is more stable than NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, being a SaaS-based solution compared to on-prem solutions like NETSCOUT."

"We see it overload once in a while. It doesn't have built-in protection. Therefore, once it gets too much data, it tends to crash. Then, we have to recover it."

"Another thing that would help out is if they packaged the NetFlow monitor into nGeniusONE. Their NetFlow monitor works with nGeniusONE where you can actually get the netflow of pretty much anything you hook it up to. But it's a separate box that you have to buy. If there was a way that could package that into nGeniusONE, it would be a complete package straight out of the box."

"nGeniusONE could be improved by reducing the number of bare metal servers required to run it. Currently, you need a separate bare metal server for each of the following: Xfinity, ISNG, nGeniusONE, and CFS. It would be more cost-effective and less complex if all of these functionalities could be combined into a single bare metal server."

"Initial setup was complex."

"NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is a complex product since it deals in areas like network packet brokers and packet analysis, making the tool complicated for end users."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"I rate the price of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE a four out of five."

"The platform is expensive."

"If you are able and you are willing to use everything that Netscout provides to you, it's probably a relatively fair price. The problem is that it's such a large and such a complex tool that I'm not sure that many companies would be able to use it entirely, the way it's expected to be used."

"This solution has saved us more than $50,000 a month and freed up 30 percent of our bandwidth."

"The biggest problem we have with this product is the expense."

"Their pricing is very competitive with other solutions... But what I like about NETSCOUT's licensing is that it's shared across all their platforms. They don't create a new licensing scheme for every one of their products. So for nGeniusONE, you buy a certain license level, and it works on all of their products."

"It is very expensive, but it's well worth the money."

"Make sure you get the low down on your licensing and understand the licensing requirements before making a purchase, especially when it comes to an upgrade. Make sure that it suits your needs before you commit to it. For example, we purchased ATA at version 6.2.1. At that time, the licensing covered everything we need. NETSCOUT comes out with 6.2.2, stating that in order to upgrade, you had to purchase CyberStream licensing. Now that requires some additional funding from both a capital investment and a maintenance cost. That's something that should have been said, "Well, if you want these additional features, you will need to purchase these CyberStreams." Otherwise, we should be allowed to continue on the basic operations as it is now through the newer releases without being stuck."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Retailer

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	37

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Regarding its high price, I give NETSCOUT nGeniusONE a seven.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 16% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 8% of the time

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 7% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 5% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

January 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

January 2026

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE product report

Also Known As

No data available

NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software provides you with tools to monitor and display information about your network both historically and in real time. The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software allows you to understand your current network usage and to plan for future needs. It also allows you to proactively troubleshoot problem areas in your network.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cerner Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

December 2025

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.