Catchpoint vs Dynatrace comparison

Catchpoint and Dynatrace are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Catchpoint is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.0, while Dynatrace is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6. Catchpoint holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Dynatrace’s 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Dynatrace users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 14 Catchpoint reviews

1,557 Views
950 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dynatrace

Read 348 Dynatrace reviews

32,460 Views
24,345 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Dynatrace

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Dynatrace and Catchpoint are both robust monitoring solutions competing in the monitoring software category. Catchpoint offers superior features and deployment models, but Dynatrace excels in pricing and ROI.

What features are offered by Dynatrace in comparison to Catchpoint?

Dynatrace features AI-driven problem detection, comprehensive monitoring capabilities, and cost-effective solutions. Catchpoint features extensive network monitoring, real-user monitoring, and detailed network insights.

What areas of improvement can be found in Dynatrace in comparison to Catchpoint?

Dynatrace needs better integration capabilities, smoother third-party integrations, and enhanced analytics. Catchpoint needs refined analytics, improved reporting features, and a more streamlined integration approach.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Dynatrace in comparison to Catchpoint?

Dynatrace offers simple deployment and comprehensive customer service. Catchpoint’s deployment has mixed feedback but strong customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Dynatrace in comparison to Catchpoint?

Dynatrace presents better value for money with higher ROI. Catchpoint is more expensive but provides features that justify its price.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. Dynatrace Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Dynatrace

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

37th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (58th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (10th)

Dynatrace

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

348

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (10th), Mobile APM (2nd), Container Monitoring (1st), AIOps (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dynatrace is 10.2%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

AnmolRai

Technical Consultant Project Lead at Capgemini

Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights

As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.

Read full review

Anand_Kumar

Enterprise Architect at DXC Technology

Provides a comprehensive view by integrating with other monitoring systems

There may be an issue since there are many tools like Splunk involved in network monitoring. From an IP perspective, Dynatrace is performing well. If they want to develop in network monitoring, they can, as it's part of their product line. It's not rocketry, so they can accomplish it. If I, as an SI, look at it from an enterprise perspective, considering the cost from the client, I prefer not to go with multiple systems, as they don't provide a complete 360-degree view. They need to improve on claims about being an enterprise system. The definition of enterprise is loosely used, however, from a holistic security perspective, including infrastructure, network, ports, software, applications, transactions, and databases, there are areas lacking, especially in network monitoring tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The thing I like most is the tech support in this company, because they have 24/7 chat support. We can chat immediately and ask them about an issue and they keep responding. They create tickets on our behalf and respond."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."

"Catchpoint provides a great amount of information."

"The best feature in Catchpoint is the alert or the notification my company gets frequently, in particular, every five minutes. It's the notification you get whenever a respective market has an issue. There's also a dashboard in Catchpoint that shows the markets you support, so all the markets will be highlighted graphically in the dashboard whenever there's downtime that could affect you. If there's no issue for a specific market, it will be in green, so in this way, anybody would be able to understand which market has issues and which market has no issues through Catchpoint. The tool is very useful for monitoring activities."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

More Catchpoint pros

"Dynatrace shows the customer path, common errors on desktop and mobile, and allows us to achieve faster page loads."

"The deployment configuration and everything is simple. It is not that complicated."

"We have identified and solved "mystery" issues that we have experienced for a long time, including sporadic latency issues on storage volumes and SQL databases not scaling properly when under certain loads."

"It is a 100 percent stable solution...Dynatrace is a highly scalable product since it is a SaaS-based application."

"Dynatrace provides visibility into the application and its performance from the user to back-end services."

"Agentless Transaction Analysis allows my team to granularly decompose complex operations and flows for business applications."

"Dynatrace alerts are based off of deviations from baseline metrics, which it is constantly collecting."

"Its AI can tell us when something is wrong, including the impacts and the root cause."

More Dynatrace pros

Cons

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."

"There's still too much manual involvement in getting customized test configurations out there. It's good, but it still takes a lot of effort. In other words, it's when you need to configure it to collect a specific variable and that kind of thing."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"The product could include global monitoring and predictive analytics to identify widespread issues and cyber threats."

More Catchpoint cons

"I would like to see the ability to pull more user-friendly reports."

"The user interface is complicated, but recent web versions are getting better all the time."

"I would like to see internal synthetic tests in the next release, which is already on the roadmap."

"Two things that can be improved are the licensing and the Business dashboard."

"Need better mapping to true business service rather than purely technical monitoring."

"I would say that this solution's reports are lacking a little bit, and because of this, you have to rely on API to fetch and pull data. I think they could have done a bit of a better job by providing a more user-friendly search from a reporting perspective."

"I find it is very difficult to train someone in using this application. As amazing as it can be, the learning curve is extensive."

"We have had problems with our middle layer application implementation."

More Dynatrace cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The setup costs for Dynatrace are low, however licensing costs are high."

"Pricing is based on the number of servers monitored, so for big applications, it is a bit expensive."

"Dynatrace is still kind of an expensive solution compared to others. But I recognize that they are ahead of the competition when we do a feature by feature comparison."

"Pricing is still too expensive."

"We have not fully been able to get the full value out of the product. It is expensive compared to other things that we have had in the past. Paying that much and not being able to get the full return on the product is a downgrade. "

"Our annual costs were about the same for both AppDynamics and Dynatrace."

"The licensing model is confusing in solutioning clients for the number of hosts needed to deploy."

"The pricing is a little high, but still cheaper than competitors because Dynatrace at least has pay-as-you-go. Others do not. However, the pricing is confusing. I wish it was more simplified when trying to price out moving to a yearly contract."

More Dynatrace pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Educational Organization

18%

Retailer

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Educational Organization

19%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...

See all answers

What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?

While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 15% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 13% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 12% of the time

SolarWinds Pingdom vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Datadog vs Dynatrace

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Dynatrace

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

More Dynatrace Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

July 2025

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace

April 2025

Download Dynatrace product report

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

Dynatrace is an AI-powered software intelligence monitoring platform that accelerates digital transformation and simplifies cloud complexities. Dynatrace is an entirely automated full-stack solution that provides data and answers about the performance of your applications and deep insight into every transaction throughout every application, including the end-user experience. By modernizing and automating enterprise cloud operations, users can deliver an optimal digital experience with higher quality software to customers faster.

Dynatrace offers an all-in-one automated artificial intelligence solution that brings together application performance, cloud and infrastructure, and digital experience monitoring. Dynatrace accelerates performance-driven results through operations, development, and business teams with a shared metrics platform. In addition, users are provided a full-stack monitoring experience with three patented technologies:

Smartscape - visualization mechanism that maps the totality of everything working in your environment and detects any casual dependencies between your applications, processes, websites, services, hosts, cloud infrastructure, and networks.
OneAgent - a technology that analyzes, gathers ,and unifies all business performance metrics throughout every layer of your technology stack.
PurePath Technology - code-level context and timings are captured from the mainframe to the cloud for all end-to-end transactions.

What does Dynatrace offer?

Dynatrace redefines how organizations monitor their digital ecosystems. The solution offers:

Cloud Automation: With AI engine Davis®, users can see the exact reason for problems and facilitate quick auto-remediation and intelligent cloud orchestration.
Application Security: With automated application vulnerability management, users can deliver applications faster and more securely.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Convenient broad visibility across your environments is provided with streamlined, automated infrastructure monitoring.
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM): Optimize your applications, provide better support, and improve user experience with a combination of Real User Monitoring (RUM), Session Replay, and synthetic monitoring throughout your environment.
Applications and Microservices: For complex cloud environments, Dynatrace can automatically provide visibility and root-cause answers. It can also monitor microservices.
Digital Business Analytics: Get AI-powered, real-time answers to analytical business queries with KPIs and metrics that are already flowing through applications.

Reviews from Real Users

Dynatrace is the only solution that provides answers to organizations based on deep insight into each user, transaction, and organization's environment.

Barry P., a managing performance engineer at Medica Health Plans, writes, "With Dynatrace, we have synthetic checks and real-user monitoring of all of our websites, places where members and providers can interact with us over the web. We monitor the response times of those with Dynatrace, and it's all integrated into one place."

A consultant at a tech service company notes, "A feature that's one of the highlights of Dynatrace is the AI. The second most valuable feature is OneAgent. Between infrastructures, applications, operating systems, you can deploy with just a single agent and can practically install and forget about it."

Dynatrace

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Audi, Best Buy, LinkedIn, CISCO, Intuit, KRONOS, Scottrade, Wells Fargo, ULTA Beauty, Lenovo, Swarovsk, Nike, Whirlpool, American Express

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. Dynatrace

July 2025

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. Dynatrace

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. Dynatrace and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. Dynatrace report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.