Top 10 CloudStack Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

31 reviews
93% willing to recommend

Top CloudStack Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to CloudStack based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, and Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. CloudStack surpasses its competitors by offering a robust, scalable platform with comprehensive management tools, efficient resource allocation, and exceptional support for various hypervisors, ensuring seamless deployment and integration in diverse cloud environments.

Apache Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Apache, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

VMware Aria Automation

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Automation

4.0 out of 5

CloudStack is appealing for its cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, attracting tech buyers preferring open-source solutions. In comparison, VMware Aria Automation's advanced automation and multi-cloud capabilities cater to those prioritizing robust features despite a more complex and expensive implementation.

Download CloudStack vs. VMware Aria Automation Report

Pricing

CloudStack offers a cost-effective setup, whereas VMware Aria Automation can be more expensive initially. Notably, CloudStack's simpler implementation contrasts with VMware's more complex deployment, leading to varying user experiences.

View comparison

Pricing

VMware Aria Operations

4.1 out of 5

VMware Aria Operations

4.1 out of 5

VMware Aria Operations offers integrated monitoring and analytics for VMware-centric environments, appealing to tech buyers seeking comprehensive insights. In comparison, CloudStack's simplicity and multi-hypervisor support attract those prioritizing budget efficiency and ease in multi-cloud scenarios.

Download CloudStack vs. VMware Aria Operations Report

Pricing

VMware Aria Operations has a higher setup cost compared to CloudStack, which offers a more budget-friendly option. This cost distinction highlights VMware's premium pricing tier versus CloudStack's affordability.

View comparison

Pricing

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)

4.4 out of 5

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)

4.4 out of 5

CloudStack is favored for its cost-effectiveness and customization, with hypervisor agnostic capability. In comparison, Nutanix Cloud Manager offers a more comprehensive solution with advanced data protection, seamless scalability, and integrated multi-cloud management, appealing to buyers seeking streamlined operations despite its higher cost.

Download CloudStack vs. Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) Report

Pricing

CloudStack setup is cost-effective for small deployments, while Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) involves higher initial expenses for robust enterprise features.

View comparison

Pricing

CloudStack setup is cost-effective for small deployments, while Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) involves higher initial expenses for robust enterprise features.

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure

4.0 out of 5

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure

4.0 out of 5

CloudStack appeals to tech buyers with its cost-effective orchestration and scalability. In comparison, Sangfor HCI attracts those seeking integrated computing, storage, and networking, providing robust performance optimization and disaster recovery, making it a compelling choice for more intricate IT infrastructure needs.

Download CloudStack vs. Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure Report

Pricing

CloudStack's setup cost is noted for affordability and flexibility, while Sangfor HCI requires a higher initial investment, offering robust integration and scalability features.

View comparison

Pricing

CloudStack's setup cost is noted for affordability and flexibility, while Sangfor HCI requires a higher initial investment, offering robust integration and scalability features.

OpenNebula

4.1 out of 5

OpenNebula

4.1 out of 5

CloudStack offers extensive orchestration features and high security for large environments, making it suitable for enterprises despite its higher cost. In comparison, OpenNebula delivers cost-effective flexibility and diverse virtualization integration, ideal for budget-conscious organizations in need of customizable cloud solutions.

Download CloudStack vs. OpenNebula Report

Pricing

CloudStack typically involves lower setup costs, while OpenNebula may incur higher initial investments due to additional configuration requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

CloudStack typically involves lower setup costs, while OpenNebula may incur higher initial investments due to additional configuration requirements.

VMware Cloud Director

4.0 out of 5

VMware Cloud Director

4.0 out of 5

VMware Cloud Director provides robust multi-tenant capabilities, ideal for large enterprises with hybrid needs, but may be costly. In comparison, CloudStack excels in hypervisor flexibility, offering cost-effective scalability in open-source environments and catering to IT-driven organizations.

Download CloudStack vs. VMware Cloud Director Report

Pricing

VMware Cloud Director has a higher setup cost, while CloudStack offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Users considering cost as a primary factor may find CloudStack's pricing structure more appealing compared to VMware Cloud Director's.

View comparison

Pricing

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

4.3 out of 5

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

4.3 out of 5

CloudStack attracts tech buyers with its open-source framework and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Tanzu CloudHealth offers comprehensive features suited for advanced needs. CloudStack's simplicity and lower cost appeal to resource-conscious teams, whereas Tanzu CloudHealth's robust management justifies higher initial expenses for greater long-term ROI.

Download CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report

Pricing

CloudStack offers a more affordable setup cost compared to VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, which tends to be higher due to its advanced feature set and integration capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

CloudStack offers a more affordable setup cost compared to VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, which tends to be higher due to its advanced feature set and integration capabilities.

CloudCheckr

3.8 out of 5

CloudCheckr

3.8 out of 5

CloudStack prioritizes cost-effective infrastructure with open-source flexibility, ideal for diverse setups. In comparison, CloudCheckr's advanced analytics support optimized expense management and security. A tech buyer choosing CloudStack gains affordability, while CloudCheckr appeals for detailed cloud financial oversight.

Download CloudCheckr vs. CloudStack Report

Pricing

CloudStack's setup costs are minimal, making it an attractive choice for startups, while CloudCheckr has higher initial investments but provides extensive cost management features ideal for enterprises.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudify

4.0 out of 5

Cloudify

4.0 out of 5

CloudStack appeals with competitive pricing and straightforward administration, ideal for infrastructure-focused users. In comparison, Cloudify attracts those valuing advanced features and flexibility, despite higher costs, due to its superior orchestration and complex deployment capabilities, benefiting organizations with diverse and sophisticated application needs.

Download CloudStack vs. Cloudify Report

Pricing

CloudStack offers competitive setup costs with minimal upfront fees, while Cloudify requires a higher initial investment, providing extensive customization options for complex infrastructure needs.

View comparison

Pricing

CloudStack offers competitive setup costs with minimal upfront fees, while Cloudify requires a higher initial investment, providing extensive customization options for complex infrastructure needs.

Related categories

Cloud Management

Configuration Management

Network Automation