CloudStack vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) comparison

Apache and Flexera are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Flexera is ranked #36. Apache holds a 2.8% mindshare in CM, compared to Flexera’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Flexera users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

2,000 Views
1,820 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Read 4 Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) reviews

726 Views
697 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CloudStack

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Flexera Cloud Management Platform and CloudStack are competing cloud management solutions. Flexera CMP seems to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while CloudStack offers stronger customization and scalability features.

Features: Flexera CMP provides advanced cost management tools, integration options for multi-cloud environments, and a focus on financial transparency. CloudStack offers scalability benefits, extensive API support, and open-source management options.

Room for Improvement: Flexera CMP could enhance its feature set to match competitors and improve integration with various platforms. Additionally, expanding customization capabilities and reducing costs could be beneficial. CloudStack might focus on simplifying deployment time, offering more user-friendly documentation, and enhancing customer support to reduce the need for extensive self-service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Flexera CMP is noted for its streamlined deployment and responsive support, contributing to operational efficiency. CloudStack's deployment is more complex due to its open-source nature, allowing high customization but possibly resulting in longer setup times. Its reliance on extensive documentation for support may require users to engage in self-service.

Pricing and ROI: Flexera CMP offers a straightforward pricing model with minimal upfront costs, appealing to businesses seeking quick ROI. CloudStack, on the other hand, has a more resource-intensive initial setup, which may challenge organizations with limited budgets, although its robust capabilities can justify the investment for projects needing extensive customization or scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Ranking in Cloud Management

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 2.8%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudStack	2.8%
Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)	1.9%
Other	95.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

reviewer2035479

Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Good CMPs for cloud provisioning and excellent scalability

There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates. However, the issue can be resolved by correcting the certificates. Getting OEMs like Huawei or Morpheus to change their products is difficult, but we found a middle ground where both Huawei and Morpheus can integrate seamlessly through Terraform. So far, the integration has been successful, but it may create a problem when the platform is under a huge load of 46 million students. We have already requested the World Bank and universities to build their case. If that kind of situation arises, they can approach Huawei and Morpheus or go with Plexadera in the end. Although the RSP or SMAX are built around Morpheus specifications specifically, we still have more certified engineers in Pakistan to win that project. The higher education commission of Pakistan has already taken up the matter with both Morpheus and Huawei. VMware refused to do anything, but Huawei has agreed to change the certificate if there is an issue. We have already identified the issue, so they will correct it if the cloud solution is finally deployed for that number of students.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudStack supports every operating system that supports hypervisors, which makes the product more attractive, compared to vCloud Director or Azure."

"You can build your own cloud and make it customizable with APIs."

"I have been impressed by CloudStack's most recent updates around Kubernetes. In particular, they have worked with Kubernetes to support the Cluster API, and you can now easily integrate Kubernetes into CloudStack and get access to a lot of good features."

"Over the years, we have valued CloudStack for its stability."

"It has become easy to deploy new devices with no or minimal hardware changes. Now, a user can be ready to use a firewall within a few minutes, as compared to the traditional physical model which involved purchase, shipping, hardware configuration, cabling, power, etc."

"The most valuable feature from my point of view is access to environment via console through separate browser window."

"Key features include stability, centralized management design that scales well, and transparent interoperability with different hypervisors and manufacturers.."

"The platform is very simple to scale-out."

More CloudStack pros

"The most valuable feature is Optima, which is something that we use quite extensively."

"With this platform, users could migrate to the cloud on the go and use public cloud services like Oracle database while integrating with their own local storage."

Cons

"It is not widely used so Google does not help very much when you are troubleshooting, and the CloudStack forum is not very active."

"I would like to see support for native VLAN, and fault-tolerance."

"A technology upgrade is one item which could be improved upon a lot."

"For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations."

"We did encounter issues with stability, and the main issue was secondary storage. When it is not available, XenServers and hypervisors are affected. And CS doesn’t do anything to reboot, or fix. Come to think of it, maybe it shouldn’t, considering their approach – CS just orchestrates everything else on the hypervisor and storage level."

"Accounts, domains, and user accounts are set up with public cloud in mind, not private."

"The main reason why we started looking for another solution: backups, replication, HA, and dependency on secondary storage. CS is quite sensitive for infrastructure, and any kind of network disruption between CS and secondary storage leads to VM hanging."

"The product does not have an easily implementable payment gateway."

More CloudStack cons

"There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates."

"Technical support is an area that can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"The price is higher than an open-source product, or CloudForms, or IBM Cloud Pak, but it is still not very high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudStack?

My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 45% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 8% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 13% of the time

Morpheus vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 7% of the time

Scalr vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 5% of the time

More Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

January 2026

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report

Download Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

RightScale Cloud Management Platform, MultiCloud Platform

Overview

Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Apache

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) offers comprehensive capabilities for managing cloud environments, enabling businesses to control costs, optimize resources, and ensure compliance across multiple cloud providers.

Flexera CMP is designed to streamline cloud management by providing a unified platform that supports automation, reporting, and policy enforcement. It empowers IT departments to efficiently manage multi-cloud environments by offering tools for workload optimization, visibility into cloud usage patterns, and governance features. Flexera CMP's integrations and customizable workflows enable seamless deployment and management of applications, reducing the complexity often associated with cloud operations.

What are the key features of Flexera CMP?

Multi-Cloud Management: Provides a centralized interface to manage resources across different cloud providers.
Cost Optimization: Identifies cost-saving opportunities through analysis and reporting tools.
Automation: Streamlines processes with automation capabilities for provisioning and lifecycle management.
Governance: Enforces policies to ensure compliance with industry standards and internal guidelines.
Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reports on cloud utilization and performance.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Cost Reduction: Helps in reducing cloud spending through proactive cost management and optimization.
Resource Efficiency: Enhances resource allocation and utilization across cloud platforms.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to best practices and regulatory requirements.
Increased Productivity: Automates routine tasks, allowing IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides insights into cloud operations for better decision-making.

Flexera CMP is particularly valuable for industries with complex IT environments such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where effective cloud management is critical to maintaining continuous operations. By leveraging Flexera CMP, these industries can optimize their cloud strategies, balance workloads efficiently, and ensure data security and compliance, thereby driving business transformation.

Flexera

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Rackspace, Softlayer, Cloudstack, OpenStack, Vmware

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

December 2025

Free Report: CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.