CloudStack vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) comparison

Apache and Flexera are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.7, while Flexera is ranked #34. Apache holds a 5.1% mindshare in CM, compared to Flexera’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Flexera users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 31 CloudStack reviews

1,938 Views
1,445 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Read 4 Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) reviews

486 Views
230 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

CloudStack

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Flexera Cloud Management Platform and CloudStack are competing cloud management solutions. Flexera CMP seems to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while CloudStack offers stronger customization and scalability features.

Features: Flexera CMP provides advanced cost management tools, integration options for multi-cloud environments, and a focus on financial transparency. CloudStack offers scalability benefits, extensive API support, and open-source management options.

Room for Improvement: Flexera CMP could enhance its feature set to match competitors and improve integration with various platforms. Additionally, expanding customization capabilities and reducing costs could be beneficial. CloudStack might focus on simplifying deployment time, offering more user-friendly documentation, and enhancing customer support to reduce the need for extensive self-service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Flexera CMP is noted for its streamlined deployment and responsive support, contributing to operational efficiency. CloudStack's deployment is more complex due to its open-source nature, allowing high customization but possibly resulting in longer setup times. Its reliance on extensive documentation for support may require users to engage in self-service.

Pricing and ROI: Flexera CMP offers a straightforward pricing model with minimal upfront costs, appealing to businesses seeking quick ROI. CloudStack, on the other hand, has a more resource-intensive initial setup, which may challenge organizations with limited budgets, although its robust capabilities can justify the investment for projects needing extensive customization or scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Ranking in Cloud Management

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 5.1%, down from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Wido Den Hollander

Community Ambassador at 42on

A solution that strikes a balance between user-friendliness, scalability, and stability

The market keeps changing, and so does technology. I think that container technology in CloudStack is an area that needs to be improved. Regarding container technology, Kubernetes is something many people want to use and something which, as of now, many are using currently. However, there is still room for improvement in Kubernetes, particularly with networking functionality and network virtualization. When it comes to what needs to be improved in CloudStack, I would say that it should stay the way it is currently. It should continue being a stable product that people can rely on since many may be inclined to follow the latest trends and hype, which is not always good for a solution's stability. It is crucial to prioritize stability, which is a key factor that companies seek. In my view, the platform could benefit from adding more metrics. More metrics would offer more insights and data on the platform's performance, utilization, and usage. Overall, I believe that having more metrics available would be highly desirable.

Read full review

reviewer2035479

Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Good CMPs for cloud provisioning and excellent scalability

There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates. However, the issue can be resolved by correcting the certificates. Getting OEMs like Huawei or Morpheus to change their products is difficult, but we found a middle ground where both Huawei and Morpheus can integrate seamlessly through Terraform. So far, the integration has been successful, but it may create a problem when the platform is under a huge load of 46 million students. We have already requested the World Bank and universities to build their case. If that kind of situation arises, they can approach Huawei and Morpheus or go with Plexadera in the end. Although the RSP or SMAX are built around Morpheus specifications specifically, we still have more certified engineers in Pakistan to win that project. The higher education commission of Pakistan has already taken up the matter with both Morpheus and Huawei. VMware refused to do anything, but Huawei has agreed to change the certificate if there is an issue. We have already identified the issue, so they will correct it if the cloud solution is finally deployed for that number of students.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudStack, by default, gives us a zone-based setup which makes it easier to manage datacenters located in different geographical areas."

"We like the virtualization capabilities."

"Everything in CloudStack works effectively."

"It is very easy to install and manage. It has the all modules in one node, unlike other software (OpenStack). The product allows a customized look and feel, and the ability to add custom workflows."

"The platform is very simple to scale-out."

"The product gives us the ability to orchestrate large virtual environments and is flexible enough to allow us to configure it for what we need. We value the flexibility of the networking feature set as well as the ability to build virtual private clouds."

"I have been impressed by CloudStack's most recent updates around Kubernetes. In particular, they have worked with Kubernetes to support the Cluster API, and you can now easily integrate Kubernetes into CloudStack and get access to a lot of good features."

"I liked the separation of the isolated network versus the shared network."

More CloudStack pros

"The most valuable feature is Optima, which is something that we use quite extensively."

"With this platform, users could migrate to the cloud on the go and use public cloud services like Oracle database while integrating with their own local storage."

Cons

"From time to time there is a bug in calculating limits of resources for customer domain/account. Maybe it’s a problem with 4.9.2."

"A technology upgrade is one item which could be improved upon a lot."

"The product could improve by embracing newer technologies like GPU virtualization."

"The user can't upload SSH keys from the UI. We have to use the API for this, and it is not always convenient."

"The Windows hosts do not get their hostnames from cloud-init."

"We recognize that CloudStack is an easy-to-use cloud management platform and, in my opinion, there has been a large number of improvements in the past few years, particular when it comes to the modern UI and overall ease of management. However, I believe that CloudStack needs to grow their marketing in the commercial side. They don't have a great piece of market share right now."

"This product needs a lot improvement on the development side. Every new version introduces new bugs. It lacks many features needed for NFV like DPDK, SR-IOV support, etc."

"The product does not have an easily implementable payment gateway."

More CloudStack cons

"There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates."

"Technical support is an area that can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"The price is higher than an open-source product, or CloudForms, or IBM Cloud Pak, but it is still not very high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Educational Organization

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Transportation Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudStack?

The initial implementation process was quite good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

CloudStack lacks a billing solution which would complete it as a full 360-degree product. Additionally, more themes and drag-and-drop interfaces could enhance the user experience. Improved document...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 72% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs CloudStack

Compared 9% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 28% of the time

Morpheus vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 22% of the time

Spot vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 20% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 13% of the time

More Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

June 2025

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

May 2025

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report

Download Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

RightScale Cloud Management Platform, MultiCloud Platform

Overview

Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Apache

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) optimizes cloud costs and resources while efficiently managing multi-cloud environments. Its features for monitoring and governance aid in compliance. Valued for integration capabilities and automation tools, Flexera CMP streamlines cloud operations.

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) excels in multi-cloud management, cost optimization, and automation. Users appreciate its detailed analytics and reporting features that effectively track usage and costs. The platform's flexibility in integrating with different cloud environments allows seamless operations across various services, while its governance and policy enforcement are significant strengths. However, some users note the need for better integration with additional cloud providers, a high installation complexity, and that the support documentation lacks depth. Reporting features could be more comprehensive, and scalability issues exist in larger environments. Frequent updates can sometimes disrupt ongoing activities.

What are the Key Features of Flexera CMP?

Multi-Cloud Management: Enables management across different cloud services efficiently.
Cost Optimization: Provides tools to optimize and reduce cloud expenditure.
Automation Tools: Streamlines operations with powerful automation capabilities.
Detailed Analytics and Reporting: Offers insight into usage and costs with robust reporting.
Governance and Policy Enforcement: Maintains cloud usage compliance through strong policy enforcement.
Integration Capabilities: Integrates seamlessly with leading cloud providers for unified operations.

What Benefits Should Users Look For?

Operational Efficiency: Enhances cloud operations through efficient management and automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces spending with advanced cost optimization tools.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates governance and maintains compliance effortlessly.
Insightful Analytics: Provides detailed reports for better decision-making and tracking.
Seamless Integration: Supports multiple cloud environments for a cohesive cloud strategy.

Flexera Cloud Management Platform is utilized across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and technology, to manage multi-cloud setups. Financial institutions leverage its cost optimization features to streamline expenses. Healthcare providers use its governance tools to ensure strict compliance with regulations. Technology companies benefit from its automation capabilities, allowing them to focus on innovation while Flexera CMP handles cloud infrastructure tasks.

Flexera

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Rackspace, Softlayer, Cloudstack, OpenStack, Vmware

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

June 2025

Free Report: CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudStack vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.