CloudStack vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation comparison

Apache and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #40. Apache holds a 2.5% mindshare in CM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

2,189 Views
2,036 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews

686 Views
604 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudStack

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenText Cloud Service Automation and CloudStack compete in the cloud services sector, aiming to enhance cloud management capabilities. OpenText appears to have the advantage in pricing satisfaction and support quality, while CloudStack stands out with its robust feature set.

Features: OpenText Cloud Service Automation offers advanced automation capabilities, orchestration of service delivery, and a comprehensive service catalog. CloudStack provides flexibility and scalability through multi-cloud support, hypervisor agnosticism, and broad compatibility with various hypervisors such as Xen, KVM, vSphere, and Hyper-V.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance user interface customization, increase integration options with third-party tools, and improve documentation comprehensiveness. CloudStack may benefit from more streamlined setup processes, improved personalized support, and enhanced interoperability features for better integration with complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Cloud Service Automation is known for its straightforward deployment process and strong customer service that eases integration into existing infrastructures. CloudStack offers a flexible deployment model requiring more setup; its community-driven support provides a vast knowledge base but less personalized assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Cloud Service Automation incurs higher initial setup costs but promises significant ROI through automation efficiencies and lower long-term operational expenses. CloudStack features a more budget-friendly setup with cost advantages but relies on strategic deployment for achieving optimal returns.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Cloud Service Auto...

Ranking in Cloud Management

40th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 2.5%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Cloud Service Automation is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudStack	2.5%
OpenText Cloud Service Automation	1.2%
Other	96.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

reviewer2311353

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation

The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management. OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support. I have been working with the product for three to five years. I rate the product's stability an eight out of…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the virtualization capabilities."

"CloudStack supports every operating system that supports hypervisors, which makes the product more attractive, compared to vCloud Director or Azure."

"The structuring of the components and isolated environments helped us when using parts of the framework at different levels of product development."

"Being able to completely virtualize a customer’s physical data center and migrate any workload into the cloud, and cover the most complex use cases - while offering high performance and true volume QoS, backed by SSD-based managed storage - is what differentiates it from other IaaS solutions."

"All our development is done on this environment because we deploy around 3,000 instances every day."

"CloudStack provides an easy way to have high availability (HA) of the virtual machines and helps with a better SLA."

"You can build your own cloud and make it customizable with APIs."

"It was easy to deploy, both for PoC and production (with HA)."

More CloudStack pros

"The ability to tie the pieces together, supporting multiple providers across both HPE and non-HPE products, is crucial in a heterogeneous environment composed of many different commercial and in-house developed components."

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user-friendly the solution is."

"Scalability is the most valuable feature to us."

"We really look at infrastructure as a service as the major trend in IT, at least for a service provider like us, for the next 3 to 4 years, so we really want to have a precise, clearly defined, but very dynamic and flexible private cloud where we can easily provision and deploy infrastructure as a service to our end customers."

"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

"These products let us integrate multiple tools together and help to automate the processes by cutting down time and effort through the modules and reusable contents."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."

Cons

"Factors that need improvement are: Visualization in terms of the resources usage. The user interface. Providing best error feedback to the users."

"I encountered some stability issues. When I tried to remove high-capacity virtual machines it took a long time to update, and sometimes the VM status failed to update properly in the cloud database. This occurred multiple times, even though I had sufficient resources."

"VPN P2S is cutting all connections except the CloudStack environment for the user when he is connected. I would like to have VPN like Cisco's AnyConnect."

"The absence of the feature, deploy an instance from a snapshot, is the weak point of the platform."

"The Windows hosts do not get their hostnames from cloud-init."

"Multi-deployments."

"It is not widely used so Google does not help very much when you are troubleshooting, and the CloudStack forum is not very active."

"For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations."

More CloudStack cons

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."

"I haven't found very user friendly things, some are a little tricky."

"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

"Deployment has been extremely painful for the production environment. This was mostly due to the decision to use our internal Microsoft-based Certificate Authority (CA)."

"I’d like to see better monitoring visibility. We have to rely on HPE Technical Services to tell us when those challenges and problems occur."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source and free."

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudStack?

My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 24% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs CloudStack

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 12% of the time

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Morpheus vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

March 2026

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

March 2026

OpenText Cloud Service Automation report

Download OpenText Cloud Service Automation product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation

Overview

Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Apache

OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

China Merchants Bank, Osiatis

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

March 2026

Free Report: CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.