CloudCheckr Reviews

We are a managed service provider, and we were looking for a product that could give us clarity in understanding the billing and security aspects of our customers' cloud. We have a lot of customers on cloud infrastructure, so we needed a tool that could help us identify the open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective for all the clouds. We needed a single dashboard where we could check what's going on and what's wrong in terms of the security and billing aspects, and CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides us with all of those.

The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security.

You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution.

I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away.

What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere.

What I'd like to see in the next release of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is from a security perspective because I've been working on independent security tools as well, so the future roadmap should include all the different kinds of compliances and vulnerabilities. Think about it from a FinTech company's perspective where there are different kinds of compliances around the data, infrastructure hardening, etc. If CloudCheckr CMx High Security could include all that, and it would have everything in terms of security in just a single solution, that's what I'd like to see in the future.

I never found any issue with CloudCheckr CMx High Security in terms of stability. I didn't even notice any downtime. For me, the solution has been stable, so far.

As my company is a managed service provider, it uses CloudCheckr CMx High Security with a lot of customers. More than sixty customers are using the solution, and I never faced any issues in terms of the solution becoming slow, not working, or hanging. It's a pretty scalable solution.

I never had any issues with CloudCheckr CMx High Security, so I've not been in touch with a technical support engineer.

My company decided to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security rather than a different solution because it's the best in the segment. In terms of flexibility, particularly on AWS, it's a perfect tool, and you don't need to worry about it at all. The functionality you're getting out of CloudCheckr CMx High Security on AWS is on another level, and none of the other tools could provide that. You can check any competitor, but CloudCheckr CMx High Security on AWS provides a lot of value.

The initial setup for CloudCheckr CMx High Security was quite simple. It was straightforward. Deployment took less than two hours. It was pretty fast.

I'm seeing ROI from CloudCheckr CMx High Security. It's worth the money, no doubt about it.

A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc.

I'm currently using CloudCheckr CMx High Security. I'm using the SaaS product and that's the latest version. It's deployed on the public cloud, particularly on AWS.

My company has different teams using the solution, and the number of users of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is around eighty, at the moment.

My advice to someone who wants to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security is that it would depend on the use case. If you are on AWS, you don't need to even think about it. Just go ahead with using the solution because there's no better tool in that segment than CloudCheckr CMx High Security.

For CloudCheckr CMx High Security on AWS, I'm rating it a ten out of ten. My use case for the solution was mostly on AWS plus GCB, but on Google Cloud, it doesn't give much value. On AWS, it's really good.

My company is a customer/partner of CloudCheckr CMx High Security.

We have used different cloud services when using CloudCheckr CMx High Security, such as Amazon AWS, Google Cloud Services, and Azure.

We are using CloudCheckr CMx High Security for cost management and optimization.

The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use.

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want.

I have been using CloudCheckr CMx High Security for approximately five years.

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is highly stable.

Most of our clients are small, medium, and large-sized companies.

We have over 10,000 people using the solution in the company.

We work very closely with the support team from CloudCheckr CMx High Security and they are very good.

I have worked in the cost-management tools from many cloud providers, such as Amazon AWS, Google Cloud Services, and Azure.

CloudCheckr CMx High Security has a lot more detail than the native cloud service cost-management tools. If you want an enterprise-grade solution, CloudCheckr CMx High Security would be a good fit. If you want something simple, out of the box, then you can use the cloud service's native tools.

The initial setup for CloudCheckr CMx High Security in our company was straightforward.

The solution is reasonably priced.

We have a team that does the administration for our company and depending on the size of the client's company there can be a large or small team.

I rate CloudCheckr CMx High Security a ten out of ten.

I primarily use the solution for my day-to-day operations. I use it for cloud management. 

The billing feature is great.

It is easy to set up.

The solution is mostly stable. 

The scalability is great.

It offers excellent technical support.

The performance of the tool really needs to be improved. It's a little bit slow.

In some cases, we only have limited options, which is disappointing. 

I've used the solution for a couple of years. It's likely been more than two at this point. 

While it is pretty stable. The performance is slow. There are no bugs or glitches. It just needs to perform a bit better. 

The solution scales well. If a company would like to expand it, it can do so. 

I've worked with technical support in the past and they were helpful and responsive. I was quite happy with their level of service. 

The implementation process is quite simple and straightforward. It's not difficult at all. 

I cannot recall how long the implementation process was. 

I don't pay for it or deal with licensing and therefore can't speak to whether or not it is expensive. 

We are both a partner and an end-user.

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. 

I'd recommend the solution. It's a good tool and pretty simple to use. It's a good tool to explore and do the cloud management stuff with.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.