CloudStack vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,289 views|1,600 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Kovai.co Logo
26 views|10 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudStack and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"When compared to OpenStack, CloudStack is also an open-source platform that is continuously improving its features and capabilities with each new version release. Having worked with CloudStack 4.7, 4.14, and most recently, 4.17, I have noticed significant enhancements in the platform's features and customer experience, such as the introduction of a new user interface in the latest release. Notably, the latest versions have made major improvements to VM live migrations, making them more efficient and effective.""The initial implementation process was quite good.""CloudStack helped us showcase our features through process visualization and functional solutions.""Multiple types of hypervisor support, multi-zone support, and VPC are great valuable features.""The back-end database design is simple and straight forward. The user interface is designed with external users in mind. Billing is relatively straightforward with this product. Not being restricted to just one hypervisor was nice.""CloudStack’s private gateway networking feature is what enables us to offer utmost security and confidentially to our customers and partners, by enabling them to connect to their virtual data centers via dedicated, encrypted, private fiber lines that never touch the public internet space. Ease of setup and management are certainly important additional benefits for us on the engineering team.""CloudStack is simple to stand up and get off the ground in a hurry. Its centralized design allows for easier troubleshooting when compared to OpenStack. Out of the box, it’s very well suited for white labeling and IaaS.""I have been impressed by CloudStack's most recent updates around Kubernetes. In particular, they have worked with Kubernetes to support the Cluster API, and you can now easily integrate Kubernetes into CloudStack and get access to a lot of good features."

More CloudStack Pros →

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us.""It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Pros →

Cons
"It would be a good to have more specific error messages within administration processes (e.g. problem with creating new instance).""Environment is sensitive, so, unlike VMware, you can not afford middle-skilled engineers, they will ruin everything.""The absence of the feature, deploy an instance from a snapshot, is the weak point of the platform. It is a feature that everyone needs nowadays.""It is not widely used so Google does not help very much when you are troubleshooting, and the CloudStack forum is not very active.""The numerous, multi-layered drill-down menus make it difficult to find one simple knob to turn.""I encountered some stability issues. When I tried to remove high-capacity virtual machines it took a long time to update, and sometimes the VM status failed to update properly in the cloud database. This occurred multiple times, even though I had sufficient resources.""The number of contributors to this solution is relatively small compared to other solutions. However, if more frequent users of CloudStack contribute to the open-source community, it will significantly enhance the overall community experience and make it more useful for everyone involved.""Accounts, domains, and user accounts are set up with public cloud in mind, not private."

More CloudStack Cons →

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications.""The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."
  • "​Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer.​​"
  • "As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."
  • "There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."
  • "CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."
  • "The solution is open-source and free."
  • "It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."
  • "CloudStack is an open-source product."
  • More CloudStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The initial implementation process was quite good.
    Top Answer:CloudStack is an open-source product. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. It provides good value.
    Top Answer:The product had some limitations. So, I decided to write my own stack from scratch. The product does not have an easily implementable payment gateway. It must provide a payment gateway hook in future… more »
    Top Answer:It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.
    Top Answer:1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and… more »
    Top Answer:We used the product mainly to manage our more than five different Azure services that were in our production environment. Serverless360 also stands out with its ability to track the flow of messages… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    2,289
    Comparisons
    1,600
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    735
    Rating
    8.3
    29th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    26
    Comparisons
    10
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Vmops, Cloud.com
    Serverless360
    Learn More
    Kovai.co
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

    Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

    Our Core features:

    1. Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
    2. Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
    3. Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
    4. End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
    5. Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.
      Sample Customers
      GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000
      MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company23%
      Educational Organization9%
      University9%
      Comms Service Provider7%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company39%
      Manufacturing Company16%
      Financial Services Firm11%
      Insurance Company5%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business38%
      Midsize Enterprise19%
      Large Enterprise42%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business33%
      Midsize Enterprise16%
      Large Enterprise51%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business36%
      Midsize Enterprise9%
      Large Enterprise56%
      Buyer's Guide
      CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
      May 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
      769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      CloudStack is ranked 12th in Cloud Management with 29 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 29th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews. CloudStack is rated 8.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CloudStack writes "A solution that strikes a balance between user-friendliness, scalability, and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". CloudStack is most compared with OpenNebula, vCloud Director, Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) and Cloudify, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

      See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

      We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.