Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CloudStack vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Apache and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Kovai.co is ranked #44. Apache holds a 2.5% mindshare in CM, compared to Kovai.co’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.
CloudStack
Read 34 CloudStack reviews
  • 2,189 Views
  • 2,036 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...
Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews
  • 2,009 Views
  • 482 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudStack and Turbo360 compete in the cloud management category. Turbo360 seems to have the upper hand due to its superior integrated monitoring and management capabilities.

Features: CloudStack offers open-source infrastructure, flexibility, and scalability, making it ideal for various cloud configurations. Turbo360 provides comprehensive monitoring, application management, and automated workflows, functioning as an all-in-one platform for cloud operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudStack requires technical expertise for deployment but benefits from extensive community support. Turbo360, with pre-configured setups and robust customer service, offers a simplified pathway for operational management.

Pricing and ROI: CloudStack's open-source framework reduces setup costs, potentially yielding a high ROI for those investing time in management. Turbo360's higher upfront expenses are justified by its operational efficiencies and advanced capabilities, offering substantial ROI for businesses focused on integrated cloud optimization.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack
Ranking in Cloud Management
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...
Ranking in Cloud Management
44th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (61st), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), Cloud Cost Management (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 2.5%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CloudStack2.5%
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)1.3%
Other96.2%
Cloud Management
 

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam - PeerSpot reviewer
Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam
Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys
Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls
I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.
Read full review
reviewer1858887 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1858887
Software Development Engineer In Test at Quinbay
Centralized, great for performing corrective actions and has a helpful Business Activity Monitoring module
1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and a few more Azure services. 3) It would be much better if it is a multi-cloud management/monitoring platform. 4) The consolidated error reports sent via the alerting channels can be a bit more intuitive. 5) Their customer support was good but good technical documentation or feature videos can be even more helpful.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Over the years, we have valued CloudStack for its stability."
"The structuring of the components and isolated environments helped us when using parts of the framework at different levels of product development."
"CloudStack helped us showcase our features through process visualization and functional solutions."
"My company could implement a lot of customizations and integration with load balancers and DNS. When we started using CloudStack, we didn't have that integration, so we developed that. We could fix anything missing in the solution."
"Everything in CloudStack works effectively."
"The back-end database design is simple and straight forward. The user interface is designed with external users in mind. Billing is relatively straightforward with this product. Not being restricted to just one hypervisor was nice."
"CloudStack is a very feature-rich product; it gives you a lot of control over your VM networks and has extensive integration with storage plugins where you can use many open source tools to bring storage into your CloudStack environment for backups or even to run VMs."
"You can manage infrastructure with a few people, since product is monolithic. We had three engineers (storage, virtual, Linux admins) only. Also, CS supports different flavours of hypervisors."
More CloudStack pros
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
 

Cons

"The area of improvement could be the regionalization aspect. For example, managing multiple regions or HubStack deployments together was not thought out thoroughly in the versions I used. We faced issues around managing the global infrastructure and had to develop around it."
"For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations."
"We did encounter issues with stability, and the main issue was secondary storage. When it is not available, XenServers and hypervisors are affected. And CS doesn’t do anything to reboot, or fix. Come to think of it, maybe it shouldn’t, considering their approach – CS just orchestrates everything else on the hypervisor and storage level."
"The area of Apache CloudStack that could stand the most improvement is the functionality/features around the virtual routers. They can be somewhat cumbersome to deal with at times and are the least stable piece of the product."
"The Windows hosts do not get their hostnames from cloud-init."
"Environment is sensitive, so, unlike VMware, you can not afford middle-skilled engineers, they will ruin everything."
"CloudStack lacks a billing solution which would complete it as a full 360-degree product."
"It would be a good to have more specific error messages within administration processes (e.g. problem with creating new instance)."
More CloudStack cons
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."
"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."
"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."
"CloudStack is an open-source product."
"​Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer.​​"
"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."
"The solution is open-source and free."
"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Computer Software Company
23%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?
CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CloudStack?
Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CloudStack?
My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack Logo
OpenNebula vs CloudStack
Compared 25% of the time
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack Logo
Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack
Compared 6% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack
Compared 6% of the time
VMware Aria Operations vs CloudStack Logo
VMware Aria Operations vs CloudStack
Compared 4% of the time
Greenqloud qstack vs CloudStack Logo
Greenqloud qstack vs CloudStack
Compared 4% of the time
More CloudStack Competitors
Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Logo
Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
Compared 10% of the time
CAST AI vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Logo
CAST AI vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
Compared 8% of the time
Elastic Observability vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Logo
Elastic Observability vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
Compared 7% of the time
Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Logo
Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
Compared 6% of the time
CloudSphere vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Logo
CloudSphere vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
Compared 3% of the time
More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CloudStack
March 2026
CloudStack reportDownload CloudStack product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2026
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reportDownload Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report
 

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com
Serverless360
 

Overview

Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.
Apache

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

Our Core features:

  1. Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
  2. Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
  3. Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
  4. End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
  5. Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.
    Kovai.co
     

    Sample Customers

    GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000
    MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF
    Buyer's Guide
    CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
    March 2026
    Free Report: CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
    Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our CloudStack vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.