We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
  • Home
  • Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudStack

Cisco UCS Director vs CloudStack comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Turbonomic Logo
Turbonomic
Read 17 Turbonomic reviews.
7,761 views|4,225 comparisons
Cisco UCS Director Logo
Cisco UCS Director
Read 3 Cisco UCS Director reviews.
2,027 views|1,596 comparisons
CloudStack Logo
CloudStack
3,131 views|2,069 comparisons
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Good support, has improved our efficiency, and has a helpful planning tool
Turbonomic has been helping us use our resources more efficiently, the challenge we currently face internally is getting people to allow the... Read more →
Use Cisco UCS Director? Share your opinion.
Use CloudStack? Share your opinion.
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, an IBM company, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: January 2022.
Download now
565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does."
  • "It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year."
  • "I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive."
  • "We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective."
  • "When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for."
  • "I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault."
  • "It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive."
  • "The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no surprise charges nor hidden fees."

    • More Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer: 
    Licensing costs are middle of the road; you need to take into account what the solution delivers to the customer. If… more »
    Read all 12 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Turbonomic?
    Top Answer: 
    It's tough to say how they could improve. They've done a lot better with their Kubernetes integration. If you'd asked me… more »
    Read all 16 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?
    Top Answer: 
    We have a hybrid cloud setup that includes some on-prem resources, and then we have AWS as our primary cloud provider… more »
    Read all 16 answers   →
    What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?
    Top Answer: 
    The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?
    Top Answer: 
    There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Cisco UCS Director?
    Top Answer: 
    The main use for this solution is for orchestration.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    VMTurbo Operations Manager
    Vmops, Cloud.com
    Learn More
    Turbonomic, an IBM company
    Cisco
    Apache
    Overview

    Turbonomic, an IBM Company, provides Application Resource Management (ARM) software used by customers to assure application performance and governance by dynamically resourcing applications across hybrid and multicloud environments. Turbonomic Network Performance Management (NPM) provides modern monitoring and analytics solutions to help assure continuous network performance at scale across multivendor networks for enterprises, carriers and managed services providers.

    For further information, please visit www.turbonomic.com

    www.turbonomic.com/resources/case-studies

    Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

    Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.
    Offer
    Learn more about Turbonomic
    Learn More
    Learn more about Cisco UCS Director
    Learn More
    Learn more about CloudStack
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, ANZ, Credit Suisse, State Street, Morningstar, VOYA, TPICAP, LPL Financial, Cisco, BMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Agilysys, MetLife, Hiscox, Humana, Tokio Marine, Allscripts, SHARP, Providence St. Joseph Health, NBC Universal, pwc, KPMG, Wayfair, Carhartt, Tiffany & Co., UCLA, NASA, NIH
    Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge
    GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Government6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider48%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government6%
    Wholesaler/Distributor4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider34%
    Computer Software Company26%
    Media Company5%
    Educational Organization4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise51%
    Large Enterprise35%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, an IBM company, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: January 2022.
    Download now
    565,689 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS Director is ranked 14th in Cloud Management with 3 reviews while CloudStack is ranked 22nd in Cloud Management. Cisco UCS Director is rated 7.6, while CloudStack is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS Director writes "Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement ". On the other hand, Cisco UCS Director is most compared with Cisco Intersight, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) and Cisco CloudCenter, whereas CloudStack is most compared with OpenNebula, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), Cisco CloudCenter, Red Hat CloudForms and Accelerite CloudPlatform.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.