Cisco UCS Director vs CloudStack comparison

Cisco and Apache are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.7, while Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Apache’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Apache users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

614 Views
583 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

2,023 Views
1,841 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

CloudStack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudStack and Cisco UCS Director are competing in IT infrastructure management. Cisco UCS Director generally has the upper hand with a wider feature set appealing to large-scale, intricate environments, while CloudStack captures attention with cost advantages and adept customer support.

Features: CloudStack provides powerful APIs, extensive support for various hypervisors, and compatibility with multiple availability zones. It offers orchestration of large virtual environments, making it a flexible cloud deployment option. Cisco UCS Director stands out by unifying infrastructure management across compute, storage, and networking, with integration capabilities enhancing its comprehensive IT management solution.

Room for Improvement: CloudStack could enhance its integration with newer technologies to maintain competitiveness. Strengthening its interface for non-technical users would also be beneficial. Improving its documentation and community resources would help new users. Cisco UCS Director could lower its initial complexity for setup. Expanding compatibility beyond primarily Cisco environments would widen appeal. Improving user interface intuitiveness could attract a larger user base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudStack is known for its easy deployment, particularly in environments with open-source tools. Its customer service is responsive and knowledgeable, which enhances overall user experience. Cisco UCS Director requires a more detailed setup due to its complexity but is supported by Cisco’s robust service network that ensures comprehensive problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: CloudStack offers lower initial costs, appealing to organizations under budget constraints, and presents quick ROI by utilizing open-source foundations. Cisco UCS Director, while having a higher upfront cost, offers substantial ROI through better operational efficiencies and infrastructure management, aligning well with larger enterprises seeking comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudStack Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudStack

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudStack is 4.3%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudStack	4.3%
Cisco UCS Director	1.3%
Other	94.4%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair

Solution Architect and Senior Consultant at Keysight Technologies

Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement

Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.

Read full review

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"The reason we went with Cisco is that it comes at a very negligible cost as part of the BOQ. Compared to the competition's products, which are incredibly expensive, UCS Director is low-cost."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"Cisco's knowledge base is extensive."

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"The product gives us the ability to orchestrate large virtual environments and is flexible enough to allow us to configure it for what we need. We value the flexibility of the networking feature set as well as the ability to build virtual private clouds."

"It gives us the ability to manage and segregate a guest network with openvSwitch and VLAN IDs."

"The most valuable feature from my point of view is access to environment via console through separate browser window."

"It has become easy to deploy new devices with no or minimal hardware changes. Now, a user can be ready to use a firewall within a few minutes, as compared to the traditional physical model which involved purchase, shipping, hardware configuration, cabling, power, etc."

"My company could implement a lot of customizations and integration with load balancers and DNS. When we started using CloudStack, we didn't have that integration, so we developed that. We could fix anything missing in the solution."

"It was easy to deploy, both for PoC and production (with HA)."

"I liked the separation of the isolated network versus the shared network."

"You can use a single API to get things done, rather than multiple APIs on multiple modules."

More CloudStack pros

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

"It is not easy to add or expand the product."

"The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate."

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"VPN P2S is cutting all connections except the CloudStack environment for the user when he is connected. I would like to have VPN like Cisco's AnyConnect."

"There are some minor things that can be improved even more such as, perhaps, a bit more polishing on the GUI side to catch up with the API possibilities (which are really extensive) but otherwise nothing critical."

"CloudStack lacks a billing solution which would complete it as a full 360-degree product."

"The area of Apache CloudStack that could stand the most improvement is the functionality/features around the virtual routers. They can be somewhat cumbersome to deal with at times and are the least stable piece of the product."

"CS has very descriptive logging, and every time I faced issues and asked for help, I didn’t get any reply from the community. Reason? Its quite obvious. CS runs on specific environments, unique to each case. So, unless it is a functional issue of CS, nobody can help you. All issues were resolved by myself going through logs. This is another reason why you need smart enough people to manage it. Engineers must have knowledge of hypervisors and understand how CS interacts with them."

"The number of contributors to this solution is relatively small compared to other solutions. However, if more frequent users of CloudStack contribute to the open-source community, it will significantly enhance the overall community experience and make it more useful for everyone involved."

"My teammates have complained about the upgrade. The source code had massive files that had to be merged with our own development to upgrade to the latest version of CloudStack. It was quite painful for them. CloudStack could add some cost management tools to give me some control over the costs associated with the number of users of my services."

"The product does not have an easily implementable payment gateway."

More CloudStack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Educational Organization

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudStack?

The initial implementation process was quite good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 36% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 27% of the time

Morpheus vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 12% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 12% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 75% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 7% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

September 2025

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

September 2025

Download CloudStack product report

Also Known As

No data available

Vmops, Cloud.com

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Apache

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudStack

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudStack

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudStack and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Director vs. CloudStack report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.