CloudStack vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

Apache and Broadcom are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Broadcom is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. Apache holds a 2.1% mindshare in CM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

3,636 Views
3,491 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 14 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

4,626 Views
2,729 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CloudStack

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudStack and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are competing products in cloud infrastructure and management. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has an edge with its advanced analytics and cloud optimization capabilities appealing to large enterprises.

Features: CloudStack offers robust cloud orchestration, scalability, and broad API support. It integrates with multiple hypervisors, supporting a flexible cloud solution. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides real-time analytics, cost optimization, and detailed multi-cloud management reporting.

Room for Improvement: CloudStack could enhance its analytics and reporting features and improve documentation for better user support. It may also benefit from expanding integration with third-party applications. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth could simplify its deployment process and further refine its user interface for ease of use, along with offering more flexible pricing options to cater to diverse businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudStack is straightforward to deploy with a simple architecture, supported by an active community. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, while complex, is backed by detailed documentation and responsive customer service, assisting those with complicated multi-cloud setups.

Pricing and ROI: CloudStack is cost-effective and provides quick ROI due to its open-source nature with lower initial costs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth involves higher upfront expenses but offers long-term savings through sophisticated cost management and cloud optimization, presenting better ROI for those seeking advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Cost Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 2.1%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 2.0%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudStack	2.1%
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth	2.0%
Other	95.9%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

Sasikiran Sakalabattina

V Mware And Vector Administration at Tech Mahindra Limited

Centralized dashboards have optimized multi-cloud costs and improved financial governance

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a powerful cloud management platform, but there are areas for improvement. I would prefer to see more AI-driven insights that not only recommend optimization but also suggest automated remediation actions. Real-time cost synchronization could be faster, as billing data sometimes has delays. More customized dashboards and report templates would help teams tailor their needs better. Kubernetes cost visibility could be more granular for centralized workloads. Integration with ITSM and automation tools such as ServiceNow and Ansible could be enhanced. Simplifying initial onboarding and policy configuration would also improve the experience for new users. These enhancements would make the platform even more efficient for enterprise cloud operations. This tool is a mature and relevant cloud management platform with several areas that could be enhanced. I would prefer to see more advanced AI capabilities providing predictive insights and automated remediation for common optimization tasks. Better, faster synchronization of cloud billing and utilization data would enable near real-time cost monitoring. I want more customizable dashboards and executive reports tailored for different stakeholders such as FinOps, infrastructure, and management teams. Improving Kubernetes container cost visibility at the pod level is also necessary. I would prefer to see stronger AI-driven automation, faster real-time cost updates, more customizable dashboards, deeper Kubernetes cost visibility, enhanced DevOps integrations, and a simpler onboarding process as areas needing improvement. These enhancements would further increase operational efficiency and make the platform more valuable for enterprise cloud management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial implementation process was quite good."

"When compared to OpenStack, CloudStack is also an open-source platform that is continuously improving its features and capabilities with each new version release. Having worked with CloudStack 4.7, 4.14, and most recently, 4.17, I have noticed significant enhancements in the platform's features and customer experience, such as the introduction of a new user interface in the latest release. Notably, the latest versions have made major improvements to VM live migrations, making them more efficient and effective."

"The back-end database design is simple and straight forward. The user interface is designed with external users in mind. Billing is relatively straightforward with this product. Not being restricted to just one hypervisor was nice."

"CloudStack provides an environment that is very simple to use, with built-in APIs and a web interface that supports almost all features of AWS and Azure."

"CloudStack has greatly helped integrate our existing infrastructure because we manage a massive cloud platform with thousands of VMs and around 1,200 to 1,500 hypervisors."

"I can recommend CloudStack because there are a lot of large companies using it in production for critical mission systems, and everything else."

"The API with CloudStack made integration into various external facing web applications simple enough."

"Key features include stability, centralized management design that scales well, and transparent interoperability with different hypervisors and manufacturers.."

More CloudStack pros

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has helped me achieve twenty to thirty percent cloud cost optimization and save thirty to forty percent of the time."

"The solution is useful for cloud transparency and visibility in reports and dashboards that I have generated, especially the pre-populated dashboards."

"Customers do utilize a security and compliance framework with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth because larger institutions won't move forward without it, and they choose VMware to ensure a tested and foolproof secure environment that complies with regulatory standards such as VMware Cloud Foundation with its trust policies, making it quite good."

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations."

"VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has positively impacted my organization by optimizing cloud costs and helping platform teams make data-driven decisions while ensuring compliance."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"After Citrix divested CloudPlatform to Accelerite, commercial support was absolutely atrocious."

"The web UI can be improved. It is too complex, and not trivial for the average user."

"For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations."

"With all that simplicity come limitations that need to be understood and planned for: Accounts, domains, and user accounts are set up with public cloud in mind, not private."

"Lack of support for third-party software vendors such as Veeam and Zerto creates limitations on comprehensive offerings which would include backup and disaster recovery."

"I think CloudStack needs to promote itself better, since I believe it a better solution than OpenStack."

"It is not widely used so Google does not help very much when you are troubleshooting, and the CloudStack forum is not very active."

"The area of Apache CloudStack that could stand the most improvement is the functionality/features around the virtual routers. They can be somewhat cumbersome to deal with at times and are the least stable piece of the product."

More CloudStack cons

"Apptio Cloudability has better granular visibility of data that is missing in CloudHealth."

"CloudHealth doesn't have that capability; they can't reach down to that level right now."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

"Some companies may not be capable of affording this product."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudStack?

My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudHealth?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is that the setup is minimal and simple. I have not been directly responsible for pricing setup in CloudHealth, bu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

The weak points of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are that while the product is quite capable, cost can be an issue at times. The learning curve is steep because people like to take their own time to und...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudHealth?

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is used primarily to provide users with a seamless working environment without losing connectivity by offering a solution that virtualizes their computing environment. It i...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 8% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

Persistent Intelligent Cloud (PiCloud) vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

Apptio Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 7% of the time

CloudCheckr vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 5% of the time

Yuki Snowflake Optimization Platform vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 4% of the time

CloudBolt vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 3% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

August 2026

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

July 2026

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

CloudStack offers an easy-to-manage platform compatible with multiple hypervisors, enabling seamless networking and efficient workload scaling. Its advanced APIs and open-source nature facilitate automation and customization, making it ideal for extensive cloud environments.

CloudStack is recognized for ease of setup, robust networking, and hypervisor compatibility. Supporting a range of workloads, it scales efficiently, offering flexible features like VM migration, private networking, and multi-zone support. Its user-friendly open-source design aids troubleshooting and customization, making it ideal for managing broad cloud deployments. Despite needing upgrades in interface and integration with third-party vendors and container technology, CloudStack remains a strong choice for businesses seeking effective virtualization solutions. Improvements in documentation, regional management, and emerging tech support would enhance usability and performance.

What are CloudStack's notable features?

Hypervisor compatibility: Supports diverse virtualization technologies for flexible deployment.
Robust networking: Ensures reliable and scalable network infrastructure management across zones.
Advanced APIs: Facilitates automation and integration to streamline cloud operations.
VM migration: Enhances operational flexibility with seamless virtual machine relocations.
Private networking: Provides secure and isolated network environments for critical tasks.
Multi-zone support: Offers scalable solutions for distributed cloud management.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Open-source model: Allows extensive customization without licensing costs, enhancing ROI.
Ease of management: Simplifies operations, reducing time and resources spent on maintenance.
Scalability: Enables growth and adaptability, fostering agility in expanding businesses.
Flexibility: Supports various workloads and environments, meeting diverse operational needs.

CloudStack is implemented across industries, used in managing virtual environments, offering IaaS in public, private, and hybrid cloud models. Companies use it for internal virtualization and customer service, integrating with hypervisors across data centers to orchestrate virtual machines and support development and testing globally.

Apache

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides an intuitive dashboard, pricing flexibility, and accountability features, helping users allocate cloud costs, enhance security, and optimize expenses for improved cloud management.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth stands out for its comprehensive cloud cost allocation by team, ensuring expense optimization and increased security. Its compliance management, scalability, and competitive pricing offer significant advantages. The platform facilitates monitoring across multi-cloud environments and delivers cost-saving recommendations. Transparent reporting and robust support enhance agility and aid in effective issue resolution.

What are the key features of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Intuitive Dashboard: Simplifies cloud management with user-friendly interfaces.
Pricing Flexibility: Offers adaptable pricing models to suit diverse needs.
Accountability Features: Supports team-based cost allocation and tracking.
Compliance Management: Ensures security standards are consistently met.
Scalability: Supports elastic growth and resource management across environments.
Performance Optimization: Provides tools to optimize cloud performance and reduce waste.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth?

Cost Savings: Identifies opportunities to optimize cloud spending.
Improved Security: Enhances cloud security protocols and monitoring.
Transparent Reporting: Delivers clear and detailed usage and cost reports.
Efficient Issue Resolution: Streamlines processes for swift problem-solving.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is extensively implemented for cloud expenditure management in multi-cloud landscapes, aiding sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail in leveraging dashboards for enhanced transparency and financial control. Users rely on the platform for monitoring health conditions, reporting costs, optimizing spending, and driving accountability through detailed analytics and insights.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

August 2026

Free Report: CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudStack vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.