VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.



| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth | 1.8% |
| VMware Aria Automation | 5.8% |
| Morpheus | 4.4% |
| Other | 88.0% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud Management | Mar 28, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Mar 28, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) | Mar 28, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs VMware Aria Operations | Mar 28, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs VMware Aria Automation | Mar 28, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM Turbonomic | 4.4 | 4.1% | 98% | 205 interviewsAdd to research |
| VMware Aria Automation | 4.0 | 5.8% | 94% | 172 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 63 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 31 |
| Large Enterprise | 84 |
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth was previously known as Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth.
Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| AI Software Developer Engineer at IBM | 3.5 | I've used VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for financial management, appreciating its cost optimization, accountability, and user-friendly dashboard; while pricey, it's scalable, stable, and offers solid ROI, with no major issues from my perspective after four years. |
| Cloud Advisor Specialist at Converge Technology Solutions Corp | 4.0 | I use VMware Tanzu CloudHealth daily to identify potential cost savings, benefiting from dashboards and custom alert policies. However, improvements are needed in CSV export features and drill-down capabilities. We've seen a positive return on investment. |
| Service Delivery Manager Cloud And Dco at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use CloudHealth for cloud cost chargeback, valuing its cost-saving recommendations and easy setup. However, I need mobile access and role-based access for team-specific spending, and its scalability has limitations. Support is good. |
| Finance consultant at Accenture | 4.0 | I use CloudHealth for cloud cost transparency and operational reports, finding its dashboards very useful. While the solution is stable and features are growing, I wish integration was easier for simpler setup. |
| Director Cloud Program & Platform Strategy at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I value CloudHealth for its strong IaaS cloud cost management and visibility, plus good support. However, I wish it offered deeper VM-level optimization and comprehensive SaaS cost management to avoid needing multiple tools, currently rating it an 8/10. |
| Solution Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | We use CloudHealth for public cloud cost reporting, finding it stable, scalable, and easy to set up with good support and better historical data than AWS. However, the "Perspectives" feature needs more flexibility and automation. I rate it 9/10. |
| Delivery Manager at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.5 | I value this solution for cloud cost and performance optimization. Setup is easy, and it scales well. My main concerns are data accuracy and occasional slowness, plus support could improve. Despite these, I recommend it. |
| Product Manager at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I find this solution great for flexible pricing and central management, offering excellent stability and support. However, it needs more features, better GCP and billing integration, easier migration, and an on-premise option. |