OpenText Functional Testing and Worksoft Certify are key players in the software testing tools category, each with distinct advantages. Worksoft Certify holds an edge in codeless automation, especially in SAP environments, favoring teams aiming for efficient test creation and maintenance without extensive scripting.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers broad compatibility across environments and technologies, ideal for GUI, API, and database testing. It stands out for ease of use and integration capabilities. Worksoft Certify provides codeless automation, excelling in SAP testing environments, enabling seamless cross-platform functionality and efficient object capturing for testing without extensive coding requirements.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing faces challenges with memory consumption, longer execution times, and cost issues, needing better cross-browser compatibility and language support. Reporting formats and CI pipeline integrations require enhancements. Worksoft Certify sometimes struggles with dynamic web applications and CI/CD tool integration, with Execution Manager and mobile testing needing improvements. The stability and responsiveness of technical support could be better.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing is commonly on-premises, demanding significant technical support, with average customer service and slower response times. Worksoft Certify offers flexible deployment, including hybrid clouds, with superior customer service, quicker response times, and proactive support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing, despite high costs, offers substantial ROI for large operations with versatile licensing. Worksoft Certify also has a higher price point but justifies it with robust SAP automation features, making ROI favorable by reducing manual testing efforts. Both stress initial high costs offset by long-term automated testing savings.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Previously, it used to take more than a week, and now it is happening in less than two days.
After automation, the same coverage was achieved with one to two testers overseeing automated runs that completed overnight, significantly reducing both education time and manual effort.
It brings measurable benefits, and I have observed time-saving, cost-saving, and resource-saving aspects with Worksoft Certify.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
If the L1 support cannot handle the issues, their L2 support is very good, as technical people come and solve the problems.
Complex issues were escalated to senior technical engineers who were knowledgeable and helped resolve them effectively.
Their technical support is responsive, which is good, and their solutions are timely.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
We are an enterprise company. It covers companies of all sizes.
I would assess the scalability of Worksoft Certify as around eight to nine, as it is designed for larger teams and complex environments, facilitating efficient testing and deployment.
When I need to add additional resources to scale up, it is easy to do so to run more tests.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
Regarding stability, I have not seen any lagging, crashing, or downtime with Worksoft Certify; it is very stable nowadays.
It depends on where this particular tool is installed, including the RAM size or the disk size of that machine.
Throughout my experience, I have not encountered any crashes, performance issues, or stability issues with Worksoft Certify.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
Focusing more on AI and its integration with Worksoft would really help enhance our processes.
There are a few areas where I experience limitations in day-to-day usage. This includes UI responsiveness when working with large projects, the effort required to stabilize object identification in dynamic web and Fiori applications, limited flexibility in reporting customization, and there is more room for improvement in API automation testing.
They need to keep working on the mobile interface, the API part, and they need to improve more on web applications.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
As it is a quality tool, the price is slightly higher, but that is acceptable compared to other tools, especially considering the ROI.
I would rate the pricing for Worksoft Certify as moderate and competitive, and I do not mark it as high.
compared to open source or lighter automation tools, the licensing cost is higher, which means organizations usually adopt it when they have a large-scale SAP landscape and need robust enterprise-level automation capabilities.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
Teams who are planning for automation and are still in manual testing can use Worksoft Certify, and significant time and resources will be reduced.
I believe it will reduce cycle time; we can save 30 to 40%, even 40 to 60% regression cycle time, with innovations we have implemented with Worksoft Certify.
It also covers end-to-end testing across different applications, enabling testing of complete business processes, and integrates with other applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Worksoft Certify | 3.2% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 6.3% |
| Other | 90.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 67 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.
Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.
What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
