OpenText Functional Testing and IBM DevOps Test UI are automated testing tools that cater to different user needs in the test automation category. User reviews indicate a preference for OpenText Functional Testing due to its advanced features, while IBM DevOps Test UI is favored for its integration and scripting ease.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports multiple browsers and environments, offers advanced object recognition with features like InsightObject.ClickSpecial, and integrates seamlessly with multiple platforms. IBM DevOps Test UI is known for its robust API integration, fast execution, and support for both .NET and Java.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance browser compatibility, reduce memory usage, and improve mobile testing capabilities. IBM DevOps Test UI needs improvements in UI change analysis, startup load time reduction, and should include more comprehensive documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing is available both on-premises and private cloud, presenting flexibility but with some CI/CD pipeline integration challenges. Customer support is responsive, though slow on complex issues. IBM DevOps Test UI is mainly on-premises with generally adequate support but could benefit from more proactive service to ensure customer satisfaction.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is perceived as expensive but good value for enterprises with its extensive features, offering high ROI from increased productivity. IBM DevOps Test UI provides a more economical licensing model with emphasis on reducing long-term costs, delivering a full return on investment through efficient testing processes.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| IBM DevOps Test UI | 1.0% |
| Other | 90.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
