Dec 01, 2021
UFT One is the one you need.
OpenText Functional Testing and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers are prominent in the functional testing software category. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers appears to have a slight upper hand due to its integration capabilities with development tools and flexibility, which are particularly advantageous for developer-focused teams.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports a broad spectrum of technologies and allows seamless integration with various environments. It offers comprehensive object recognition features, advanced automation capabilities, and scripting environments such as VBScript, API, and GUI test execution. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers builds on these features by providing enhanced code customization in languages like Java and C#, which is particularly beneficial for teams that require high integration and scripting flexibility.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing users often face challenges with stability, memory usage, and the complexity of creating reusable frameworks. High deployment costs and the need for frequent updates are also concerns. Greater browser compatibility and reduced system resource consumption are needed. Users of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers suggest enhancing integration with open-source solutions and expanding support for diverse programming languages. Better integration with DevOps tools and improved cloud functionality are also desirable.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer on-premises and cloud deployment options, although users prefer on-premises setups for security reasons. Customer service for OpenText Functional Testing receives mixed feedback, with some noting prompt support and others facing delays in complex issues. Similarly, the support quality for OpenText Functional Testing for Developers varies depending on the vendor and region.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is seen as costly, with complex licensing models compared to open-source alternatives. However, the expense is often justified by the long-term productivity and efficiency gains, leading to a positive ROI. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers also provides significant cost-benefit returns, particularly where developer productivity and integration with other development tools are essential. Both products require significant upfront investment, with returns realized over extended use periods.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| Other | 88.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
