Dec 01, 2021
UFT One is the one you need.
OpenText Functional Testing and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers are key players in the software testing tools category, both focusing on different aspects of automation. OpenText Functional Testing seems to have the upper hand with its extensive object recognition abilities and versatile automation capabilities, whereas OpenText Functional Testing for Developers emphasizes ease of integration with development environments.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports a wide range of browsers and technologies, offers extensive object recognition including HTML5, and compatible testing frameworks like BPT. It offers image recognition and runtime loading for Flex applications. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers integrates well with Visual Studio, allows test creation using Java and C#, and supports continuous integration to align closely with development cycles.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing users highlight a need for better browser compatibility, particularly with Chrome and Safari, less VBScript dependence, and enhanced performance. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers could improve with broader technology support, easier integration with open-source platforms, and reduced execution times, along with enhancing its CI/CD integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products provide deployment flexibility with options for on-premises and cloud solutions. OpenText Functional Testing is noted for broader private cloud deployment scenarios. Customer service experiences vary, with some issues in response times reported, but high-tier support offers valuable assistance. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers seems to have fewer customer service interactions.
Pricing and ROI: Both products are considered expensive, yet offer significant ROI by reducing manual testing and increasing coverage. OpenText Functional Testing provides cost savings over time with various licensing models despite initial high costs. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers aligns with modern development practices, adding ROI through its continuous integration processes, though pricing concerns persist with a desire for more flexible licensing.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
