BrowserStack vs LambdaTest comparison

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while LambdaTest is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7. BrowserStack holds a 10.8% mindshare in FT, compared to LambdaTest’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of LambdaTest users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

5,592 Views
3,443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

3,174 Views
2,187 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

LambdaTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are competitors in cross-browser testing solutions. LambdaTest may have the upper hand with its pricing and feature set, though BrowserStack is favored for its customer support and ease of deployment.

Features: BrowserStack offers real device testing, seamless integration with development tools, and extensive browser coverage. LambdaTest is known for automation testing, parallel testing, and integration with CI/CD tools.

Room for Improvement: BrowserStack could enhance its automation capabilities and expand its support for legacy browsers. LambdaTest might improve its setup ease, offer more real device options, and reduce the complexity of its configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BrowserStack provides a straightforward deployment process and excellent customer support, aiding in quick resolutions and onboarding. LambdaTest may require more initial setup effort but offers comprehensive support channels once integrated.

Pricing and ROI: BrowserStack has higher initial setup costs, though some find its value justified through its reliability and customer support. LambdaTest's lower pricing offers attractive ROI with a robust feature set, appealing to those seeking comprehensive testing solutions at a competitive price.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.8%, up from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.7%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Dinesh Saharan

Presales at Net Solutions

The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users

I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."

"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."

"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

"I like that it offers full device capability."

"The integration is very good."

More BrowserStack pros

"HyperExecute adds significant speed to execution, enhancing the overall testing process."

"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time testing, which helps you to test your website on more than two thousand combinations of browsers and operating systems."

"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."

"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."

"The primary feature that has significantly improved our test execution times is automation."

"The solution is very easy to understand and has a user-friendly UI."

"It is a scalable solution."

More LambdaTest pros

Cons

"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."

"We had some execution issues."

"There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required."

"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."

"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."

"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."

"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."

More BrowserStack cons

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."

"The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting."

"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."

"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."

"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."

"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."

More LambdaTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"The price is fine."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"This is an affordable product."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Educational Organization

23%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 23% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 3% of the time

Selenium HQ vs BrowserStack

Compared 3% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 15% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Testsigma vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

June 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

June 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

June 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.