BrowserStack vs LambdaTest comparison

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while LambdaTest is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. BrowserStack holds a 10.2% mindshare in FT, compared to LambdaTest’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of LambdaTest users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

5,177 Views
4,815 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

2,877 Views
2,589 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

LambdaTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are competing in the cross-browser testing domain. BrowserStack seems to have the upper hand with its feature richness and ease of deployment, while LambdaTest offers competitive pricing and favorable ROI.

Features:BrowserStack is recognized for its extensive device coverage, real-time testing, and integration capabilities with a wide range of browsers and operating systems. It provides cross-browser compatibility testing with access to numerous devices for manual and automated testing. LambdaTest offers seamless integration with popular development tools, geolocation testing, and supports parallel testing, making it appealing to developers focused on efficient test cycles.

Room for Improvement:BrowserStack could enhance support for more diverse browser versions and improve the user interface for complex configuration scenarios. Additionally, expanding automation documentation might help users maximize functionality. LambdaTest might consider extending the range of supported native devices and simplifying its deployment complexity. Increasing device availability and providing more in-depth usage tutorials could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:BrowserStack offers a streamlined deployment process, allowing for rapid setup and intuitive use. Its customer service is well-regarded. LambdaTest, while having a more complex deployment process, provides robust technical support and extensive onboarding resources. Both solutions deliver excellent customer service, although LambdaTest emphasizes strong support structure and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI:BrowserStack comes with a higher cost due to its sophisticated capabilities and feature set, making it suited for large-scale projects. LambdaTest offers a cost-effective model providing a quick return on investment, ideal for small to medium-sized projects. Its competitive pricing makes it attractive for budget-conscious buyers seeking comprehensive testing abilities.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.2%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.4%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
BrowserStack	10.2%
LambdaTest	5.4%
Other	84.4%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Dinesh Saharan

Presales at Net Solutions

The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users

I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."

"We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices."

"Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable."

"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."

"Maintenance of the solution is easy."

More BrowserStack pros

"The support docs are precise and you can get started with them easily."

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."

"It is a scalable solution."

"Without a doubt, LambdaTest is one of the big reasons behind our faster deployment and better team collaboration."

"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."

More LambdaTest pros

Cons

"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."

"One of the biggest issues with BrowserStack is that if you don't have your network set up by the book, it's hard to get it to work with local desk machines."

"If you are inactive for 30 minutes, the solution will close."

"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."

"We had some execution issues."

"I would like to see clearer visibility."

"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."

"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

More BrowserStack cons

"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

"The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting."

"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."

"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."

More LambdaTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The price is fine."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."

"I used the product for free."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

See all answers

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 22% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 5% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

Selenium HQ vs BrowserStack

Compared 3% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 13% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

Testsigma vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

September 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

September 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

September 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.