IBM DevOps Test UI vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
22nd
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
10th
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Selenium HQ
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
5th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 0.4%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Selenium HQ is 4.1%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
Unique Categories:
Regression Testing Tools
0.4%
 

Featured Reviews

HZ
Aug 15, 2022
Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support
The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation The solution has provided more accurate results with database verification. Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time. The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework.…
HA
Dec 5, 2022
Open-source and easy to set up but can be challenging to learn
Maybe they could improve the record and play plugin for element detection. That would be ideal. If they could build some tools above Selenium for that, I'd find it helpful. People sometimes do not have that much technical knowledge, and having something more plug-and-play would be appealing. We have many plans in our pipeline that still need to be implemented. Maybe we will find that we need some features that need to be integrated with Selenium, for example, for a multi-browser or for implementing many machines. We haven't fully implemented this solution yet. The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn. You need resources and technical knowledge and have to deal with the maintenance of script changes. While it works well with Chrome, if you use it with other browsers, you may have issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to catch content from website."
"The most valuable aspect of Selenium is that it gives you the flexibility to customize or write your own code, your own features, etc. It's not restricted by licensing."
"Its biggest advantage is that it is very customizable."
"It is more stable in comparison to other solutions because they have quite some experience in the market."
"The main characteristic that is useful is that the tool is completely free."
"The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations."
"The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"The solution is very flexible; there are different ways of using it. It's open-source and has a lot of support on offer."
 

Cons

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"The initial setup was difficult."
"Could have additional readability and abstraction."
"Shadow DOM could be improved and the handling of single page applications. Right now, it's a bit complicated and there are a lot of additional scripts required if you want to handle a single page application in a neat way."
"The solution does not offer up enough information in regards to personality testing."
"We'd like to see some more image management in future releases."
"Selenium Grid set-up is bit complex."
"There is no good tool to find the Xpath. They should provide a good tool to find Xpath for dynamic elements and integrate API (REST/ SOAP) testing support."
"They should leverage the tools for supporting Windows apps."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."
"Selenium is open-source."
"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
"I have been using the open-source version."
"It's open-source, so it's free."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
"Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing."
"Currently, Selenium HQ is free for customers."
"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational Functional Tester?
Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time.
What needs improvement with IBM Rational Functional Tester?
The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to...
What is your primary use case for IBM Rational Functional Tester?
The solution is used for test automation, and test data creation.
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester
SeleniumHQ
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edumate
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Selenium HQ and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.