Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Selenium HQ vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 4, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

Selenium HQ
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
4th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
104
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
1st
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
106
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Selenium HQ is 4.9%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 18.2%, up from 14.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

HA
Dec 5, 2022
Open-source and easy to set up but can be challenging to learn
Maybe they could improve the record and play plugin for element detection. That would be ideal. If they could build some tools above Selenium for that, I'd find it helpful. People sometimes do not have that much technical knowledge, and having something more plug-and-play would be appealing. We have many plans in our pipeline that still need to be implemented. Maybe we will find that we need some features that need to be integrated with Selenium, for example, for a multi-browser or for implementing many machines. We haven't fully implemented this solution yet. The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn. You need resources and technical knowledge and have to deal with the maintenance of script changes. While it works well with Chrome, if you use it with other browsers, you may have issues.
JH
Jan 19, 2022
Good online support, and has a reusable model
Tricentis Tosca is used to test our in-house products. We have developers for Google and other web applications for our internal use, but that product is developed by outsourced developers, that needs to be tested The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The grids, as well as the selectors, are the most valuable features."
"There is a supportive community around it."
"Selenium HQ has a lot of capabilities and is compatible with many languages."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is the ability to create automatic tests that can replicate human behavior."
"The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is the ability to configure a lot of automated processes."
"The solution is very easy to implement."
"It is compatible with and supports multiple languages, such as Java and Python. It is open source, and it is widely used."
"Some of the most valuable features of this solution are open-source, they have good support, good community support, and it supports multiple languages whether you use C-Sharp or not. These are some of the most important benefits."
"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is the Tosca Commander. Functionality is another thing I find most valuable in the solution."
"This solution is very easy to learn and any non-programmer or manual tester, with little experience in automation, can pick it up quite easily."
"The low code is the best feature."
"The use of automation is most valuable."
"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."
"It's been very helpful to have connectivity with mobile. The tool also identifies some of the actual changes from the recordings on the actual testing suite. That is something that I really like."
"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
 

Cons

"Selenium has room for improvement as it does not support the tests and result-sharing in anything but a manual way."
"One limitation of Selenium is that it is purely focused on web application testing."
"Selenium HQ can improve by creating an enterprise version where it can provide the infrastructure for running the tests. Currently, we need to run the test in our infrastructure because it's a free tool. If Google can start an enterprise subscription and they can provide us with the infrastructure, such as Google Cloud infrastructure where we can configure it, and we can run the test there, it would be highly beneficial."
"It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements."
"Handling frames and windows needs to be improved."
"The solution is open-source, so everyone relies on the community to assist with troubleshooting and information sharing. If there's a complex issue no one has faced, it may take a while to solve the problem."
"We do not have enough resources or enough people to employ and hire. So, I'm hiring whoever I find, and they don't always have enough technical knowledge to operate Selenium."
"Coding skills are required to use Selenium, so it could be made more user-friendly for non-programmers."
"The product is not very stable when used with cloud storage. It is very hard to load the screen, making it difficult to use the tool in cloud storage."
"Needs a UI to visualize the test case development."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
"Product quality has declined as it grows, and its updates aren't without fault. The process of resolving problems has slowed, and as it expands into other areas like NeoLoad and other testing tools, the product becomes more complicated. It used to be a small firm with a clear goal, but as it grows, the quality has been affected."
"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."
"It is quite difficult to integrate the solution with other tools."
"The product needs to improve its pricing. It also needs to improve the infrastructure and DEX agent setup."
"We faced some hardships in implementing the solution because of integration."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The setup cost is open source or free."
"Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing."
"There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0."
"It is an open-source tool."
"The product is open-source and free."
"It's open-source, so it's free."
"It is an open-source product, it is free for anyone to use."
"It is an open-source solution."
"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."
"There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies."
"It is expensive. There is also the training cost, but it does speed up the process. So, you get a return on investment."
"​It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."
"I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."
"The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly."
"I am satisfied with the cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
801,314 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
 

Also Known As

SeleniumHQ
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about Selenium HQ vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: August 2024.
801,314 professionals have used our research since 2012.