OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #38, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText holds a 0.3% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 18.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

203 Views
171 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 112 Tricentis Tosca reviews

21,494 Views
11,822 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and OpenText Business Processing Testing compete in software testing automation. Tricentis Tosca seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while OpenText may be superior for its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers model-based test automation, integration with various applications, and high reusability of test assets. OpenText Business Processing Testing provides enterprise-level capabilities, extensive analytics, and strong support for SAP ecosystems.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could enhance its complex scenario handling, scalability for larger environments, and further simplify its interface. OpenText Business Processing Testing might improve its initial deployment complexity, reduce costs for smaller enterprises, and enhance support for non-SAP applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca features straightforward deployment with excellent customer service, allowing for quick implementation. OpenText Business Processing Testing provides comprehensive deployment options but requires a longer setup period, suitable for extensive customization in large operations.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is known for competitive entry costs and quick ROI through minimized manual efforts. OpenText Business Processing Testing, with potentially higher initial costs, claims substantial ROI over time, especially in complex enterprise systems.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

38th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (3rd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 18.5%, up from 18.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis Tosca	18.5%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.3%
Other	81.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features

The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."

"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."

"With one click, it will scan all the elements on the screen, so that the user can select the required elements for automation tests."

"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."

"The platform's most valuable feature is model-based testing, which is effective for test case design and optimization."

"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."

"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."

"Makes optimal use of Model-based Test practice in getting Object-references from the application."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"It is quite difficult to integrate the solution with other tools."

"I would say the reporting part of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I would like to see better integration with other testing tools."

"They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies."

"I think the downside would be licensing costs which are very high."

"The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic."

"Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us."

"There should be ease of data manipulation within automation test cases."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back."

"If you are purchasing less than five licenses, then the pricing is high. On a scale from one to ten, with one being low and ten being high pricing, I would rate this solution at eight."

"I am satisfied with the cost."

"It is expensive. There is also the training cost, but it does speed up the process. So, you get a return on investment."

"A competitor of Tricentis Tosca: Katalon Studio, is very similar and offers lower pricing, though Tricentis Tosca offers more features and benefits."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive tool and the licensing is not simple."

"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

August 2025

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

August 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

August 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.