OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #39, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 19.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

165 Views
135 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 111 Tricentis Tosca reviews

23,656 Views
13,011 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Tricentis Tosca and OpenText Business Process Testing are competing products in the automated testing domain. Tricentis Tosca seems to have the upper hand in ease of deployment, while OpenText offers a more powerful solution for intricate business processes.

Features: Tricentis Tosca focuses on model-based testing, allowing smooth integration with various technologies including web, mobile, and more. It facilitates adaptive test execution and offers scriptless automation, making it ideal for non-technical users. OpenText Business Process Testing emphasizes automation within business workflows and a centralized testing framework, providing exceptional reusability of content and integration with other business software.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could enhance its user experience by refining advanced features for technical users and improving documentation for complex scenarios. Enhanced scalability and support for more niche technologies would also be beneficial. OpenText might benefit from reducing initial setup complexity, expanding third-party integration capabilities, and improving its user interface for more intuitive navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers agile deployment owing to its flexible architecture, straightforward setup, and robust customer support, making it easily adaptable in diverse environments. Conversely, OpenText often entails a more complex setup due to its comprehensive feature set, but it compensates with detailed documentation and extensive integration support.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca provides competitive pricing with structured plans leading to rapid ROI through efficient testing strategies. Its model-based approach minimizes maintenance costs, offering immediate cost-effectiveness. On the other hand, OpenText incurs higher initial setup costs, with its focus on extensive capabilities and process integration promising a favorable long-term ROI for businesses needing comprehensive process automation.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

39th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

111

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 19.2%, up from 17.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features

The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."

"What I find valuable is that Tricentis is always refining the test methodology. They listen to feedback from the analysts about what the testing tool should do, and then Tricentis always implements it. So all the necessary testing functions are already implemented in their tools."

"It's a simple tool, particularly in terms of system testing. You can also convert and automate using Tricentis Tosca with ease."

"For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing."

"Tricentis Tosca is well integrated with other products like Jira."

"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."

"The scalability is a valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca."

"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"One thing to improve in Tricentis Tosca is that it's not compatible with Excel based forms. Another area for improvement is that the tool is not compatible with OpenText applications. The support and licensing cost for it also need improvement. The tool also needs cloud support, as it's currently on-premises only."

"The Vision AI implementation works very slowly, affecting the speed of our work."

"Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us."

"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."

"Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It should improve the testing of legacy systems and interfaces."

"In Tosca, I see that there are no user guides."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."

"They need to improve on the reports after the execution of automation tests, since all the current organizations are looking for detailed graphical reports."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

"The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc."

"It is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly."

"A competitor of Tricentis Tosca: Katalon Studio, is very similar and offers lower pricing, though Tricentis Tosca offers more features and benefits."

"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."

"I give the cost of Tricentis Tosca a six out of seven."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

July 2025

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

June 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.