OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #37, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText holds a 0.5% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 15.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

294 Views
241 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,866 Views
10,565 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and OpenText Business Process Testing are leading contenders in software testing, each offering unique strengths. Tricentis Tosca is renowned for its support and ease of deployment, whereas OpenText is favored for its feature-rich capabilities, especially in SAP testing.

Features: Tricentis Tosca provides model-based test automation, robust CI/CD pipeline integration, and seamless support for multiple software ecosystems. It allows for codeless automation, enabling easier usage for non-technical users. OpenText excels in SAP application testing, comprehensive test management capabilities, and has a strong focus on enterprise applications, supporting complex business processes.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could enhance its user interface and improve its capabilities in integrating with niche enterprise applications. Expanding advanced analytics and reporting features would be beneficial. Additionally, support for more bespoke environments could increase adaptability. OpenText could benefit from streamlined initial setup processes to reduce IT complexity. An enhanced user interface and better support for small to mid-sized enterprises will make it even more versatile. More intuitive documentation and user guidance would also enhance the deployment experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca is known for its straightforward deployment process, with dedicated customer service enhancing user onboarding and troubleshooting. This makes it appealing for rapid implementation. OpenText, while potentially requiring a more in-depth IT commitment, offers extensive enterprise support that is particularly beneficial for large-scale SAP implementations. Its strong customer service helps navigate deployment challenges for significant returns.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is competitively priced, offering a rapid return on investment due to quick deployment and time-saving automation features. Its cost-effectiveness attracts businesses seeking rapid implementation with minimal initial outlay. OpenText, while potentially incurring higher initial costs, delivers significant ROI over time, especially for enterprises focusing on comprehensive SAP business process testing. Its deep integration potential promises long-term benefits, making the investment worthwhile.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (3rd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 15.7%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis Tosca	15.7%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	0.5%
Other	83.8%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Soumya Jain

Test Automation Specialist at Accenture

Has useful scanning, basic web application automation, and data validation capabilities

The main issue with Tricentis Tosca is its cost, which is very high. Although using Tosca can reduce the number of testers needed compared to open-source tools like Selenium, companies might still need to focus on resources. I would recommend Tricentis reduce the cost of its licenses. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten as I am satisfied with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"Tosca is a low-code no-code automation tool, allowing direct automation and reusability of test cases."

"Tricentis Tosca can be easily integrated with SAP infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is the Tosca Commander. Functionality is another thing I find most valuable in the solution."

"The item that is different from all the other tools is that it's module based."

"We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis."

"We can also create customized functions. For example, if something isn't supported in Tricentis Tosca Commander, we can create our own function to integrate it with Tosca Commander, so we can utilize it and integrate with the macros."

"It offers many features, such as risk-based testing and scenario creation using Kafka."

"With one click, it will scan all the elements on the screen, so that the user can select the required elements for automation tests."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."

"While the initial setup was straightforward, we required assistance with the configuration to ensure that everything was done correctly."

"The main area where there is room for improvement is how they do upgrades. Going through this current upgrade, we were delayed a month because we are using a third-party tool. It's called Tosca Connect by Tasktop. When this latest upgrade broke that relationship between the two, it took Tricentis a month to come back with a workable solution... Their whole upgrade process needs to be better and cleaner, from an end-user standpoint."

"It needs better integration with JIRA."

"Their license management should be improved. One of our customers is a global customer. They want to use one licensed server and then split the licenses based on the different users of the different business units, but currently, there is only one license server that everybody can access. There is no control, and that's why sometimes congestion can happen."

"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."

"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."

"It would be of great help if they can fix the loading or performance issues. Sometimes, when I create the test case folder and test cases, it feels like it has loading or performance issues. When passing the objects, we can't sometimes find the exact element. We need to find out that exact location and just give the path for that, and then it works. In the pipeline, when creating Jenkins, we create the list execution for passing the execution list to the commander. I feel it is a bit late, by a fraction of seconds. I first thought it could be my mistake or a setting issue, but I worked on that, and it's not a mistake or a setting issue."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

"A competitor of Tricentis Tosca: Katalon Studio, is very similar and offers lower pricing, though Tricentis Tosca offers more features and benefits."

"Pricing could be better."

"I give the cost of Tricentis Tosca a six out of seven."

"We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution."

"A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros."

"It is expensive."

"There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 50% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

December 2025

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

December 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.