We performed a comparison between IceWarp and Skype for Business based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Zimbra and others in Email Applications."The solution's voice services work well for our company."
"Its price is the most valuable. It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."
"The solution has a very good log-in to the UI when compared to other solutions."
"It has great communication capabilities for team chatting and web conferences."
"IceWarp has multiple applications that are easy to use for many people."
"The solution is stable and scalable."
"I have found Skype for Business to be stable."
"The security seems good."
"The solution is easy to use and includes the ability to text message, video and voice chat, and transfer files."
"It's a good product, we like using it."
"What is most valuable about Skype for Business is that almost everyone knows about it and almost everyone has it. You will be able to reach a large number of people."
"The deployment is very fast."
"I like the seamless integration to local telecommunications."
"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."
"With multiple databases for VOIP, chat and web IMAP, maintenance is cumbersome."
"It is difficult to disable user rights on the console so some users accidentally delete their documents or user details."
"Our customers sometimes have problems receiving mail."
"The exchange compatibility mode is rather limited. Their technical support can also be better. They only provide online support, and there should be some option for escalating."
"Skype for Business could improve by having a document channel or repository. Microsoft Teams has a better repository place for documents that you can share with your team. You can access it anywhere from any device."
"I am not familiar with all of the features or whether they can hold conferences because we use Zoom for that. But, in my opinion, if they can do something similar to what Zoom is doing, it will be a complete solution."
"Lacks a zoom-in feature for whoever is presenting."
"Skype for Business could improve the interface. It could be easier to use. Additionally, it's hard to find the people or add people you want to communicate with."
"Skype for Business is not stable."
"Microsoft Teams, as I see it now, is more useful than Skype for Business."
"The challenge we had with Skype for Business was with the signing in when a user signed out and when signing in back in again, there was a bit of a problem. We switched from Skype for Business to Teams, and Teams never had that sign-in problem once we did the switch."
"There are not many options, in terms of some other third-party integration."
IceWarp is ranked 6th in Email Applications with 5 reviews while Skype for Business is ranked 7th in Virtual Meetings with 18 reviews. IceWarp is rated 8.6, while Skype for Business is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of IceWarp writes "An inexpensive and scalable solution for small- to medium-sized businesses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skype for Business writes "Communication and collaboration tool with multi-device setup, but lacks dynamic file updating". IceWarp is most compared with Zimbra Collaboration, Microsoft Exchange, KerioConnect and Google Workspace, whereas Skype for Business is most compared with Webex, TeamViewer, Zoom, GoToMeeting and Office 365.
We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
