We performed a comparison between IceWarp and Zimbra Collaboration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's voice services work well for our company."
"The solution has a very good log-in to the UI when compared to other solutions."
"Its price is the most valuable. It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."
"IceWarp has multiple applications that are easy to use for many people."
"It has great communication capabilities for team chatting and web conferences."
"The product is easy to set up."
"Good email solution and it's open-source."
"A lot of other products like Microsoft Exchange offer email or collaboration features, but they are not as fast as Zimbra."
"The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable."
"The web interface is powerful and easy to use."
"Zimbra Collaboration's sharing features are most valuable."
"Zimbra Collaboration has integrated a lot of their party tools and they have good documentation available."
"One of the most valuable features involves the solution's automatic backup, which I find to be pretty simple and straightforward, and obviates the need for additional software."
"With multiple databases for VOIP, chat and web IMAP, maintenance is cumbersome."
"The exchange compatibility mode is rather limited. Their technical support can also be better. They only provide online support, and there should be some option for escalating."
"Our customers sometimes have problems receiving mail."
"It is difficult to disable user rights on the console so some users accidentally delete their documents or user details."
"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."
"The installation is not straightforward, it can take two days for the full implementation."
"I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many."
"Zimbra should provide a desktop client. Right now, we are using a web browser for accessing our emails. There should also be a desktop client."
"There are some security issues."
"It is good and competent, but you have to pay for video and group chat features."
"I would like to see a Microsoft schedule function added."
"The solution could use more integration with third-party tools."
"Zimbra Collaboration could improve the migration from a basic solution to a more containerized solution. For example, the installation should be able to extend to the containers and manage them with some solution, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes."
IceWarp is ranked 6th in Email Applications with 5 reviews while Zimbra Collaboration is ranked 3rd in Email Applications with 14 reviews. IceWarp is rated 8.6, while Zimbra Collaboration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IceWarp writes "An inexpensive and scalable solution for small- to medium-sized businesses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zimbra Collaboration writes "Automatic backup with good web client features for an easily scalable, stable, installable and manageable solution". IceWarp is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, KerioConnect, Google Workspace, Microsoft Exchange Online and Fortinet FortiMail, whereas Zimbra Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Microsoft Exchange Online, KerioConnect, Google Workspace and Open-Xchange. See our IceWarp vs. Zimbra Collaboration report.
See our list of best Email Applications vendors.
We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
