We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Dynatrace is the preferred option over New Relic based on user reviews. It offers better AI capabilities, real user monitoring, session replay, and synthetic monitoring functionalities. Dynatrace has good visibility and can thoroughly scan services and applications with the ability to analyze traffic. Dynatrace's pricing and licensing are mixed, but it has provided cost savings through automation and decreased mean time to identification and repair.
"It has enabled us to have a deeper insight into our application availability and performance."
"We got firsthand RCA as soon as we finished implementation."
"Overall, it has provided improved stability to our system both within prod and non-prod environments."
"It collects and analyses information with AI, which is useful."
"Since things are getting more complicated, it is nice to have artificial intelligence to correlate issues and events to come up with root cause."
"Dynatrace's power lies in its ability to inspect and chart transactions, and draw the PurePath tree. The parameters of the requests and methods can be selected to access the necessary information for efficient analysis."
"Performance has improved substantially since we started using it."
"Developers love the tool, because it is easy to use. They can immediately see how their code behaves."
"Every time there is a crisis, high traffic, or if we see a problem with a server, we go to New Relic and monitor it to determine the cause."
"New Relic has helped us in terms of the optimizing our print and loading times."
"They have baseline level alerting."
"The solution is good for sending alerts, drawing graphs about system usage, and creating plug-ins."
"The VPN is one of the solution's most valuable features for us."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is the dashboard, New Relic Insights. I configured my own dashboard to monitor certain parameters."
"The best feature of New Relic is its simple look and feel, making it easier to use than other tools."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"The integration with PagerDuty is currently broken on mobile."
"More visibility into Python processes."
"The integration of the tools is getting there. It is still not there yet, because we still have to get a lot of tools to put together."
"PurePath exports was a great feature in AppMon, but it is sometimes missing in Dynatrace."
"Scalability-wise, on the data side, I'm really worried because they are giving only seven days data retention. They should plan something on that, to increase the data."
"One thing we'd like to see is mobile native replay. They don't have a timeline on it yet, but that's one of the key things we're looking at, to get rid of one of our incumbent products that does replay."
"Enterprise application monitoring for synthetic, as is, only captures http/https transactions."
"Right now, for AppMon, the maximum handling load, the transaction per minute, is around 6,500. We had an issue on Black Friday or Cyber Monday, some kind of stability issue for users who could not log in. I want to see an increase in the load, at least to 7,000 or 8,000 transactions per second"
"I would like to be able to invest less time in IT and ad hocs. We should be concentrating on other issues."
"I would like an infrastructure network that provides real-time views, showing the issues."
"New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided."
"New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"How granular I could go down at looking at certain data, especially related to the operations, is limited."
"It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available."
"The connectivity between legacy and newer cloud applications is not great."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 340 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 151 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security, Azure Monitor and Elastic Observability, whereas New Relic is most compared with Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana, Azure Monitor and Prometheus. See our Dynatrace vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best Mobile APM vendors, and best AIOps vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitoring. We maintain critical processing on our mainframe so there was a desire to include this in our transaction trace. Due to a highly mature ELK implementation, we are not trying to incorporate log analytics into solution buy may consider in the future. We had AppD, Dynatrace, New Relic, and CA Wily all in house at the time of our evaluation. We eliminated Datadog due to a lack of real user monitoring and AppD based on experience and licensing. Between Dynatrace and New Relic, Dynatrace won based on the automation, integrated AI, support for "old" techs, and confidence we could eliminate multiple APM and infra monitoring tools.
I would not include products like BigPanda, MoogSoft, in this analysis. They are not monitoring solutions but event correlation solutions. You will need additional monitoring products to capture data and feed them. Having said that if you cannot consolidate tools you will likely need to purchase an event solution to make sense of all the alarms. We did evaluate these products but with Dynatrace AI did not feel the business value was there for the investment.
Here's a quick pro/con list on Dynatrace & New Relic from our analysis.
New Relic Pros: Insights is an awesome product and capability. Lots of capabilities and plugins to extend data collection. The APM dashboard is aesthetically pleasing and intuitive. Good training and documentation are available to support the product.
New Relic Cons: Requires lots of manual configurations to implement and support. Insights product requires an investment of time to achieve value. Licensing is a nightmare as there is virtually no transparency in what you are being charged for. Lack of solution to consolidate alerts across implementation other than significant investment in insights to manually achieve this.
Dynatrace Pros: Very simple to implement and maintain with out of the box automation which supports modern (cloud/Kubernetes) and "old" (mainframe). In-app chat is helpful. High integration of infra and APM data for full-stack observability and engineering. Topology and trace discovery is more reliable than other products or our CMDB. Synthetics are easy to set up for any user. AI-assisted problem analysis on the trace discovery streamlines troubleshooting. AI includes "events" in an analysis like VMotion, deployment events. Have not done yet but looking to leverage monitoring as code for a fully integrated and automated delivery pipeline. See keptn.sh open source project.
Dynatrace Cons: User SQL lacks some functions of NRQL for user analysis. Host, process, and service data is not available to query within the product. Alarm processing lacks some granular controls. The Plug-in library is less robust.
Good luck with your decision!
We are currently going through a paper-based analysis to select an Enterprise APM solution.
Our Contenders are
1. Dynatrace
2. Cisco(AppDynamics)
3. Broadcom DX-APM
Shortlisted based on existing relationships with other products and services they provide.
We discounted New Relic- despite their growing capability - as they are yet to enter the enterprise APM solution scene.
With regards to your response "We eliminated Datadog due to a lack of real user monitoring and AppD based on experience and licensing .." :
Will you be willing to expand on Appd - what was your experience and issues w.r.t licensing. These could help us with our evaluation. Much appreciated. Regards Adrian
Could you please share your requirements ? There are a lot tools can be added to the list. I spent almost 6 months to test and check many tools then I select eG enterprise.
Thanks