Documentation is one of the biggest things that I have a problem with since its documentation is not clear sometimes. Logging right now is something I want to improve. So, every log that you have has to have an issue. So logging needs to be probably set right. I would like to see more logging capabilities in the solution. If they can accept logs, they just can't report. So, I guess reporting on logging is something I want to see in the future.
The initial setup can be made easier. Like Mixpanel, New Relic can also have a step-by-step guide for the setup process. It needs slight improvements to be made in the user experience.
I would like for this solution to improve the automatic configurations of workloads and capabilities. In the next release, I'd like to see a better pricing structure.
One thing I'd like to see in any APM, especially New Relic, is the ability to use distributed transactions. When one microservice calls another, it calls another database and microservice. The entire data visualization layer will not be able to correlate from one microservice from end to end and return on that path. Distributed transactions would be a great addition that would make life simpler. Unfortunately, no APM has that end-to-end capability. When I say "distributed transactions," I'm not only talking about the database level. It needs more and better visualization of communications across various microservices and integration with logs.
New Relic APM is a good tool, and it has a database of failures, but it could use a list of customer-specific failures. For example, if my application went down last year, it should figure out why it went down and what the root cause is through artificial intelligence and machine learning. New Relic APM should be able to give my company advanced analytics through AI. The tool has a self-healing mechanism, advanced analytics, and the ability to send alerts, but in the next release, I'd like more improvement on that front, including better AI and machine learning.
Marketing Executive at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-11-29T10:32:44Z
Nov 29, 2022
There were some settings we had issues with. For example, a certain setting to change the time zone. If we change the time zone, it will take 24 hours to reflect the time zone and make the changes. It'll be great if the settings once we change them, reflect the change at least after one hour. That would be helpful so that we don't need to wait for one complete day to see the changes.
New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better. Dynatrace provides security vulnerabilities for all applications and this is where New Relic lacks. Additionally, there should be more use cases for automation. From the application team's perspective, they should be able to identify the issue before it occurs. This is the main feature that any monitoring tool should have. New Relic was not able to trace back to the original method of the transactions where the issue occurred. This area needs to be improved.
Cloud Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Consultant
2021-12-28T00:05:31Z
Dec 28, 2021
There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue.
New Relic is a versatile tool that can be customized to fit the needs of different organizations. Its primary use cases include performance monitoring, time series analysis, infrastructure monitoring, synthetic monitoring of APIs, and providing insight into UI performance. New Relic APM is a popular application monitoring tool that provides in-depth observability of an application's performance, including database queries, website response times, and page load times.
The...
The solution must provide better support for Azure Web Apps service. The solution does not completely support the architecture of Azure Web Apps.
The solution needs to have staging.
Documentation is one of the biggest things that I have a problem with since its documentation is not clear sometimes. Logging right now is something I want to improve. So, every log that you have has to have an issue. So logging needs to be probably set right. I would like to see more logging capabilities in the solution. If they can accept logs, they just can't report. So, I guess reporting on logging is something I want to see in the future.
The initial setup can be made easier. Like Mixpanel, New Relic can also have a step-by-step guide for the setup process. It needs slight improvements to be made in the user experience.
I would like for this solution to improve the automatic configurations of workloads and capabilities. In the next release, I'd like to see a better pricing structure.
The price could improve.
Some AIOps are missing in New Relic APS, and I would like to see more features in this area.
One thing I'd like to see in any APM, especially New Relic, is the ability to use distributed transactions. When one microservice calls another, it calls another database and microservice. The entire data visualization layer will not be able to correlate from one microservice from end to end and return on that path. Distributed transactions would be a great addition that would make life simpler. Unfortunately, no APM has that end-to-end capability. When I say "distributed transactions," I'm not only talking about the database level. It needs more and better visualization of communications across various microservices and integration with logs.
New Relic APM is a good tool, and it has a database of failures, but it could use a list of customer-specific failures. For example, if my application went down last year, it should figure out why it went down and what the root cause is through artificial intelligence and machine learning. New Relic APM should be able to give my company advanced analytics through AI. The tool has a self-healing mechanism, advanced analytics, and the ability to send alerts, but in the next release, I'd like more improvement on that front, including better AI and machine learning.
There were some settings we had issues with. For example, a certain setting to change the time zone. If we change the time zone, it will take 24 hours to reflect the time zone and make the changes. It'll be great if the settings once we change them, reflect the change at least after one hour. That would be helpful so that we don't need to wait for one complete day to see the changes.
The solution should include more detailed reports for SQL database requests.
New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better. Dynatrace provides security vulnerabilities for all applications and this is where New Relic lacks. Additionally, there should be more use cases for automation. From the application team's perspective, they should be able to identify the issue before it occurs. This is the main feature that any monitoring tool should have. New Relic was not able to trace back to the original method of the transactions where the issue occurred. This area needs to be improved.
The solution only supports the cloud platform and not on-premises. Therefore, they should assess supporting the licensing on-premises as well.
There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue.