We performed a comparison between Cegid, PeopleSoft, and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management."Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"It's very fully featured. It has more features and more configurability than SAP."
"A valuable feature is FSCM."
"PeopleSoft is resilient and has the flexibility for us to customize it."
"The new version of this solution is very scalable."
"The integration between Human Capital Management (HCM) and PeopleSoft is an important feature."
"The PeopleSoft interface is very good."
"I'd like PeopleSoft to be like on the cloud and more mobile-friendly. If I try to access it from a cell phone, it's a bit difficult, so it would be great if PeopleSoft could improve these features."
"In general, this solution is user friendly and also performs well. There are two types of forms. One is a standardized form, which you can define things into. The other, you can customize so more repetition can be done in an even manner. That way, it can be designed for what the public or user actually wants. It's not very tough for any person, or layman to understand exactly what the screen requires one to do."
"It has the best data management features."
"SAP HCM has a good performance."
"The master data where most of the reports were run from was the most valuable. We were quite satisfied with this module."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The setup was straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is Organizational Management (OM)."
"Payroll processing is my favorite HCM feature, and I like all the SuccessFactors talent modules also. SAP is making good progress on enhancements to the features in the SF modules."
"All our employee data, like performance and payroll, is managed through SAP HCM."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"training and performance could be improved."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"I would like to see improvement in the UI."
"The Time and Labor module is not that flexible."
"There could be more adaptability of the system."
"The API integration could be better."
"Often support just asks people to install a lot of upgrades. Sometimes they don't really give you clear details as to why you need to upgrade. They just say, "You need to upgrade this because there's a newer image, etc". They never really give you the reason underlying why you are having errors."
"On the other hand, the more recent push for standardization precludes customized approaches to certain industry requirements."
"This solution could be improved by lowering the cost of support."
"PeopleSoft should be more flexible with the configuration. There should be less coding and more configuration."
"It was difficult to deploy. There were challenges regarding configurations and implementation. So, we had a lot of issues."
"There are already success factors for the cloud solution which cannot be integrated into S/4 HANA."
"We find some challenges in the integration between SAP HCM and SAP SuccessFactors."
"Its reporting feature could have customization options."
"The organizational structure visualization could be improved in future releases. The solution has a very poor interface."
"SAP HCM's long and tedious transactions can be improved."
"SAP HCM could improve by having more resources and making it more user-friendly. It is complex."
"The solution is rather expensive."