We performed a comparison between Cegid and Workday based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"I would say that we have definitely seen a return on investment."
"It's a fully consolidated system. All the transactions and configuration are co-located in one fully in-memory system, so there is no need to go to different data sources (multiple DBs) to pull data; it’s all in one place."
"The solution was very good at reconfiguration and customization of their software. It helped us to meet federal regulations."
"Performance and good usability are the two most valuable features of this solution."
"The solution is extremely stable."
"The platform itself is very robust and I generally like the reporting and analytics capability."
"It's easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature of Workday is the ease of use which is overall user-friendly."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"training and performance could be improved."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"The user interface could be modernized somehow."
"The security console should be made less complex."
"My only suggestion might be to include a brief description of any new fields we introduce, making it easier for people to use them. Perhaps this is something they can consider implementing."
"The implementation could have gone a little smoother."
"The cost of Workday is certainly not inexpensive. It's very pricey."
"The solution can be improved by speeding up the load time when pulling up information."
"The product must include payroll features."
"We would like to see improvement in the mobile app variant of this solution. The time sheet entry and approval, and the geo-tagging features all need to have their functionality updated, in order to be comparable with other products on the market."
Cegid is ranked 24th in Talent Management with 12 reviews while Workday is ranked 2nd in Talent Management with 49 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while Workday is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Workday writes "The solution's interface is clean, organized, and easy to use ". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, UKG and BambooHR, whereas Workday is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and UKG. See our Cegid vs. Workday report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.